Collective Free Music Improvisation as a Sociocommunicative Endeavor: A Literature Review

Abstract

This article is a review of literature that conceptualizes the practice of collective free music improvisation as a sociocommunicative endeavor, with its appended value and implications to musicians and music learners. Researchers have revealed that this conceptualization breaks down cultural and stylistic music boundaries to establish understanding and empathy among diverse and unique performers—through live music interactions and communication on an egalitarian and evolving platform that is negotiated by all participants. To enable collective free music improvisation pedagogically, researchers have highlighted the importance and ways of approaching it as a form of social interactionism, developing a personal music language to converse fluently and meaningfully, and establishing shared understanding among fellow improvisers as the foundation for music interaction. Together, these pedagogical implications may be synergized to inform ways in which classroom free improvisational practices may nurture expressive and confident improvisers rooted in the reality of the moment, as well as in the music conversations with one’s self and others.

Keywords

free music improvisation music education music improvisation music pedagogy social constructivism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atton

(2012). Genre and the cultural politics of territory: The live experience of free improvisation. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15, 427–441. doi:10.1177/1367549412442671

Azzara

(1999). An aural approach to improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 86(3), 21–25. doi:10.2307/3399555

Azzara

Grunow

R. F.

(2006). Developing musicianship through improvisation, Book 1. Chicago, IL: GIA.

Azzara

Grunow

Gordon

(1997). Creativity in improvisation. Chicago, IL: GIA.

Bailey

(1992). Improvisation: Its nature and practice in music. London, England: The British Library.

Bastien

B. T.

Todd

J. H.

(1992). Cooperation as communicative accomplishment: A symbolic interaction analysis of an improvised jazz concert. Communication Studies, 43, 92–104. doi:10.1080/10510979209368363

Berge

P. L.

Luckmann

(1967). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Anchor.

Berliner

P. F.

(1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Blackwell

Young

(2004). Self-organised music. Organised Sound, 9, 137–150. doi:10.1017/S1355771804000000

10.

Borgo

(2001/2002). Synergy and surrealestate: The orderly disorder of free improvisation. Pacific Review of Ethnomusicology, 10, 1–24. Retrieved from https://ethnomusicologyreview.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/prevol10.pdf

11.

Borgo

(2002). Negotiating freedom: Values and practices in contemporary improvised music. Black Music Research Journal, 22, 165–188. doi:10.2307/1519955

12.

Burnard

(2002). Investigating children’s meaning-making and the emergence of musical interaction in group improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 19, 157–172. doi:10.1017/S0265051702000244

13.

Burrows

(2004). Musical archetypes and collective consciousness: Cognitive distribution and free improvisation. Critical Studies in Improvisation, 1(1). doi:10.21083/csieci.v1i1.11

14.

Canonne

Aucouturier

J. -J.

(2015). Play together, think alike: Shared mental models in expert music improvisers. Psychology of Music, 44, 544–558. doi:10.1177/0305735615577406

15.

Canonne

Garnier

N. B.

(2015). Individual decisions and perceived form in collective free improvisation. Journal of New Musical Research, 44, 145–167. doi:10.1080/09298215.2015.1061564

16.

Dobbins

(1980). Improvisation: An essential element of musical proficiency. Music Educators Journal, 66(5), 36–41. doi:10.2307/3395774

17.

Engeström

Miettinen

Punamäki

R. -L.

(1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Green

(2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. London, England: Ashgate.

19.

Green

(2008). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. London, England: Ashgate.

20.

Gustavsen

(1999). The dialectical eroticism of improvisation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Norway.

21.

Healey

P. G. T.

Leach

Bryan-Kinns

(2005, January). Inter-play: Understanding group music improvisation as a form of everyday interaction. Paper presented at the conference Less Is More—Simple Computing in an Age of Complexity, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, England.

22.

Kanellopoulos

P. A.

(1999). Children’s conception and practice of musical improvisation. Psychology of Music, 27, 175–191. doi:10.1177/0305735699272008

23.

Kanellopoulos

P. A.

(2007a). Children’s early reflection on improvised music-making as the wellspring of musico-philosophical thinking. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 15, 119–141. doi:10.2979/PME.2007.15.2.119

24.

Kanellopoulos

P. A.

(2007b). Musical improvisation as action: An Arendtian perspective. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 6, 97–127. Retrieved from http://act.maydaygroup.org/articles/Kanellopoulos6_3.pdf

25.

Kanellopoulos

P. A.

(2011). Freedom and responsibility: The aesthetics of free musical improvisation and its educational implications: A view from Bakhtin. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 19, 113–135. doi:10.2979/philmusieducrevi.19.2.113

26.

Koutsoupidou

Hargreaves

D. J.

(2009). An experimental study of the effects of improvisation on children’s creative thinking in music. Psychology of Music, 37, 251–278. doi:10.1177/0305735608097246

27.

Lange

B. R.

(2011). Teaching the ethics of free improvisation. Critical Studies in Improvisation, 7(2). doi:10.21083/csieci.v7i2.964

28.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Lewis

(2013). Dialogue as a way of knowing: Understanding solo improvisation and its implications for an education for freedom. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 23, 255–261. doi:10.1037/pmu0000013

30.

Liperote

K. A.

(2006). Audiation for beginning instrumentalists: Listen, speak, read, write. Music Educators Journal, 93(1), 46–52. doi:10.1177/002743210609300123

31.

Meade

G. H.

(1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

32.

Mertz

Parmentier

R. J.

(Eds.). (1985). Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

33.

Monk

(2013). Symbolic interactionism in music education: Eight strategies for collaborative improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 99(3), 76–81. doi:10.1177/0027432112467823

34.

Monson

(1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

35.

H. H.

(2014). Free improvisation as living expression. In Lum

C. H.

(Ed.), Contextualized practices in arts education: An international dialogue on Singapore (pp. 77–99). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-55-9

36.

Niknafs

(2013). Free improvisation: What it is, and why we should apply it in our general music classrooms. General Music Today, 27(1), 29–34. doi:10.1177/1048371313482921

37.

Nunn

(1998). Wisdom of the impulse: On the nature of musical free improvisation. Retrieved from http://intuitivemusic.dk/iima/tn_wisdom_part1.pdf

38.

Pras

Schober

M. F.

Spiro

(2017). What about their performance do free jazz improvisers agree upon? A case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 966. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00966

39.

Pressing

(1988). Improvisation: Methods and models. In Sloboda

J. A.

(Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation and composition (pp. 129–178). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

40.

Pressing

(1998). Psychological constraints on improvisational expertise and communication. In Nettl

Russell

(Eds.), In the course of performance: Studies in the world of musical improvisation (pp. 47–67). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

41.

Sansom

M. J.

(2005, April). Understanding musical meaning: Interpretative phenomenological analysis and improvisation. Paper presented at “Cross Cultural Approaches,” 2005 British Forum for Ethnomusicology annual conference, London, England.

42.

Sansom

M. J.

(2007). Improvisation and identity: A qualitative study. Critical Studies in Improvisation, 3(1). doi:10.21083/csieci.v3i1.48

43.

Sarath

(1996). A new look at improvisation. Journal of Music Theory, 40, 1–38. doi:10.2307/843921

44.

Sawyer

R. K.

(2003). Group creativity: Music, theatre, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

45.

Sawyer

R. K.

(2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34, 148–165. doi:10.1177/0305735606061850

46.

Sawyer

R. K.

(2008). Learning music from collaboration. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 50–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.004

47.

Schober

M. F.

Spiro

(2014). Jazz improvisers’ shared understanding: A case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 808. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00808

48.

Strauss

Corbin

J. M.

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

49.

Sutton

J. P.

(2001). “The invisible handshake”: An investigation of free musical improvisation as a form of conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. AAIU485643)

50.

Thomson

(2008). The pedagogical imperative of musical improvisation. Critical Studies in Improvisation, 3(2). doi:10.21083/csieci.v3i2.353

51.

van der Schyff

. (2013). The free improvisation game: Performing John Zorn’s Cobra. Journal of Research in Music Performance, Spring. doi:10.21061/jrmp.v0i0.726

52.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

53.

Wright

Kanellopoulos

(2010). Informal music learning, improvisation and teacher education. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 71–87. doi:10.1017/S0265051709990210