Benefits and Challenges of Large-Ensemble Instrumental Music Adjudicated Events: Insights From Experienced Music Teachers

Abstract

Adjudicated events, including music festivals, contests, and competitions, are performance opportunities for American instrumental music programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the benefits and challenges of participating in large-group instrumental adjudicated events in three Kansas high school programs. Data analysis followed cross-case procedures for coding data, as well as strategies for trustworthiness. Select findings revealed that participants (a) valued the process of preparing for adjudicated events, (b) valued and sought out additional instructional staff as a means of enriching the process of preparation for adjudicated events, (c) identified multiple logistical challenges associated with preparing for and attending adjudicated events, and (d) identified music considerations associated with attending large-group adjudicated events. These are likely pivotal factors in attending adjudicated events and thus can help us further understand how and why adjudicated events hold an important place in the history of American music education.

Keywords

adjudicated events competition instrumental music large ensemble

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramo

J. M.

(2017). The phantasmagoria of competition in school ensembles. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 25, 150–170. doi:10.2979/philmusiceducrevi.25.2.04

Austin

J. R.

(1988). The effect of music contest format on self-concept, motivation, achievement, and attitude of elementary band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 95–107. doi:10.2307/3345243

Belfour

C. S.

(1935). The values of music contests. Music Educators Journal, 21(5), 22–23. doi:10.2307/3384879

Belfour

C. S.

(1937). Non-athletic high-school contests: 40,000 orchestras 600,000 debaters. Clearing House, 12(2), 81–85. doi:10.2307/30176417

Bergee

M. J.

(1989). Reform for the band program. Music Educators Journal, 75(9), 18–22. doi:10.2307/3400325

Bergee

M. J.

(2006). Validation of a model of extramusical influences on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 244–256. doi:10.2307/4151345

Bergee

M. J.

McWhirter

J. L.

(2005). Selected influences on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings: Replication and extension. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 177–190. doi:10.2307/3345517

Bergee

M. J.

Platt

M. C.

(2003). Influence of selected variables on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 342–353. doi:10.2307/3345660

Bergee

M. J.

Westfall

C. R.

(2005). Stability of a model explaining selected extramusical influences on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 358–374. doi:10.1177/002242940505300407

10.

Bowen

G. O.

Miller

C. H.

Hall

M. C.

Wilson

G. V.

Breach

Smith

H. F.

(1929). Gaining community support for the school music program. Music Supervisors’ Journal, 15(3). doi:10.2307/3382942

11.

Brakel

T. D.

(2006). Inter-judge reliability of the Indiana State School Music Association High School instrumental festival. Journal of Band Research, 42(1), 59–69.

12.

Bruno

Thompson

Austin

J. R.

Geffre

Dyson

Russell

(1989). Point of view: Are music contests valuable for young children? Music Educators Journal, 75(6), 44–47. doi:10.2307/3398129

13.

Brunsed

Sochinski

Hinkle

(1983). The attitude of college band students toward high school marching band competition. Journal of Band Research, 19(1), 11–17.

14.

Chenoweth

(1947). What shall we do about competition? Music Educators Journal, 33(3), 20–24. doi:10.2307/3388451

15.

Floyd

(1986). Music contests: A means or an end? The Instrumentalist, 41(5), 70–71.

16.

Garman

B. R.

Boyle

J. D.

DeCarbo

N. J.

(1991). Orchestra festival evaluations: Interjudge agreement and relationships between performance categories and final ratings. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 2, 19–24.

17.

Geringer

J. M.

Allen

M. L.

MacLeod

R. B.

Scott

(2009). Using a prescreening rubric for all-state violin selection: Influences of performance and teacher experience. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28(1), 41–46. doi:10.1177/8755123309344109

18.

Hamann

D. L.

Mills

Bell

Daugherty

Koozer

(1990). Classroom environment as related to contest ratings among high school performing ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 215–224. doi:10.2307/3345185

19.

Hash

P. M.

(2012). An analysis of the ratings and interrater reliability of high school band contests. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 81–100. doi:10.1177/0022429411434932

20.

Hewitt

M. P.

(2007). Influence of primary performance instrument and education level on music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 18–30. doi:10.1177/002242920705500103

21.

Howard

K. K.

(1994). A survey of Iowa high school band students’ self-perceptions and attitudes toward types of music contests (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9433638)

22.

Hurley

(1996). Musical chairs: The psychological and social impact of competition. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 20(2), 74–87.

23.

Jolly

D. R.

(2008). Music educator perceptions of declining enrollments in Texas band programs (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3323725)

24.

Latimer

M. E.

Bergee

M. J.

Cohen

M. L.

(2010). Reliability and perceived pedagogical utility of a weighted music performance assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 168–183. doi:10/1177/0022429410369836

25.

Meyers

B. D.

(2011). Attitudes of high school band directors in the United States toward solo and ensemble activities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3453504)

26.

Meyers

B. D.

(2012). Attitudes of Arizona high school band directors toward solo and ensemble activities. Journal of Band Research, 48(1), 30–44.

27.

O’Leary

E. J.

(2016). A phenomenological investigation of competition in high school bands (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10243860)

28.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Pope

D. A.

Barnes

G. V.

(2015). Influence of education, performance level, and presentation medium on evaluations of string orchestra performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 189, 7–22.

30.

Rawlings

J. R.

(2015). Traversing the terrain of music competitions: Curricular mapping with adjudicated events in mind. In Conway

C. M.

(Ed.), Musicianship-focused curriculum and assessment (pp. 425–456). Chicago, IL: GIA.

31.

Rohrer

T. P.

(2002). The debate on competition in music in the twentieth century. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 21(1), 38–47. doi:10.1177/87551233020210010501

32.

Seidman

(2012). Interviewing as qualitative research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

33.

Stake

R. E.

(2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

34.

Stegman

S. F.

(2009). Michigan state adjudicated choral festivals: Revising the adjudication process. Music Educators Journal, 95(4), 62–65. doi:10.2307/30219240

35.

Sullivan

T. M.

(2003). Factors influencing participation of Arizona high school marching bands in regional and state festivals (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3080892)

36.

Wilson

G. V.

(1926). Making the most of contests. Music Supervisors’ Journal, 13(2), 11–65. doi:10.2307/3382639

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

16.02 MB