The purpose of this literature review is to examine research on peer mentoring among K–12 students to assist practitioners with how to incorporate these instructional techniques into their own music programs. Primary themes across the music education literature of peer mentoring include the role of music teachers, the role of students as they learn from each other, and the role of socialization. This article concludes with implications for music educators and recommendations for future studies to inform practice and to guide further research into peer mentoring among K–12 students.
AlexanderL.DorowL. G. (1983). Peer tutoring effects on the music performance of tutors and tutees in beginning band classes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 33–47. doi:10.2307/3345108
2.
AustinJ. (1990). Competition: Is music education the loser?Music Educators Journal, 76(6), 21–25.
3.
DarrowA. A.GibbsP.WedelS. (2005). Use of classwide peer tutoring in the general music classroom. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 24(1), 15–26. doi:10.1177/87551233050240010103
4.
FarmerD. M. (2015). Urban music education: A critical discourse analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3700184)
5.
FayK. A. (2013). In search of effective jazz education: An analysis and comparison of pedagogical methods employed by directors of successful high school jazz ensembles (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1538595)
6.
FodorD. B. (1998). Critical moments of change: A study of the social and musical interactions of precollegiate jazz combos (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9913792)
7.
GoodrichA. (2007). Peer mentoring in a high school jazz ensemble. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 94–114. doi:10.1177/002242940705500202
8.
GreenL. (2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
9.
GreenL. (2008). Music, informal learning, and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
10.
HebertD. (2005). Music competition, cooperation, and community: An ethnography of a Japanese school band (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3163382)
11.
JohnsonE. A. (2011). The effect of peer-based instruction on rhythm reading achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 38, 43–60.
12.
JohnsonE. A. (2013). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted structures on music achievement and learner engagement in the secondary large ensemble (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3561981)
13.
JohnsonE. A. (2015). Peer-teaching in the secondary music ensemble. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3, 35–42. doi:10.11114/jets.v3i5.906
14.
KoenigC. A. (2011). A study of student leadership in the college, high school, middle school, and elementary school music ensembles within Southern California (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1492987)
15.
LarsonR. (2015). Creativity in the jazz ensemble: Let’s get away from the written jazz solo. Music Educators Journal, 102(1), 33–36. doi:10.1177/00274321155583642
16.
LeblerD. (2008). Popular music pedagogy: Peer learning in practice. Music Education Research, 10, 193–213. doi:10.1080/14613800802079056
17.
MullenC. A. (2005). Mentorship primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18.
ScruggsB. B. (2008). Learning outcomes in two divergent middle school string orchestra classroom environments: A comparison of a learner-centered and a teacher-centered approach (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3371516)
19.
ScruggsB. B. (2009). Constructivist practices to increase student engagement in the orchestra classroom. Music Educators Journal, 95(4), 53–59. doi:10.1177/0027432109335468
20.
SheldonD. A. (2001). Peer and cross-age tutoring in music. Music Educators Journal, 87(6), 33–38. doi:10.2307/3399690
21.
ShieldsC. (2001). Music education and mentoring as intervention for at-risk adolescents: Their self-perceptions, opinions, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 273–286. doi:10.2307/3345712
22.
StrandK. (2005). Nurturing young composers: Exploring the relationship between instruction and transfer in 9–12 year-old students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 165, 17–36. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40319268
23.
TaylorJ. (2016). Peer mentoring within the middle and high school music department of the international school of Kuala Lumpur: A case study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10135020)
24.
Van WeeldenK.Heath-ReynoldsJ.LehmanS. (2016). The effect of a peer mentorship program on perceptions of success in choral ensembles: Pairing students with and without disabilities. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 1–7. doi:10.1177/8755123316675480
25.
WebbR. S. (2015). An exploration of three peer tutoring cases in the school orchestra program. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 203, 63–80. doi:10.5406/203.0063
26.
WoodyR. H. (2007). Popular music in school: Remixing the issues. Music Educators Journal, 93(4), 32–37.
