This multiple case study examined six adolescent band students engaged in self-directed practice. The students’ practice sessions were videotaped. Students provided verbal reports during their practice and again retrospectively while reviewing their video immediately after practice. Students were asked to discuss their choice of practice strategies, their self-assessment process, and their motivation. This study suggests that student use (and nonuse) of aural imagery seemed to affect practice in multiple ways relating to motivation, goal setting, strategy use, and self-assessment. The quality of aural image a student had of the music to be played seemed to be related to the student’s level of music literacy.
BarryN.HallamS. (2002). Practicing. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 151–166). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BrodskyW.KesslerY.RubinsteinB.GinsborgJ.HenikA. (2008). The mental representation of music notation: Notational audiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 427–445.
3.
ChaffinR.ImrehG. (2001). A comparison of practice and self-report as sources of information about the goals of expert practice. Psychology of Music, 29, 39–69.
4.
CreswellJ. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321.
6.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
7.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
8.
GordonE. (2003). Learning sequences in music: Skill, content and patterns. Chicago, IL: GIA.
9.
GordonE.FonderM. (1999). All about audiation and music aptitudes: Edwin E. Gordon discusses using audiation and music aptitudes as teaching tools to allow students to reach their full music potential. Music Educators Journal, 86(2), 41–44.
10.
HallamS. (1997). The development of memorization strategies in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 14, 87–97.
11.
HallamS. (2001). The development of metacognition in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 27–39.
12.
HaywardC.GromkoJ. (2009). Relationships among music sight-reading and technical proficiency, spatial visualization, and aural discrimination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 26–36.
13.
HewittM. P. (2001). The effects of self-evaluation, self-listening, and modeling on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322.
14.
KimS. (2008). A collective case study of self-regulated learning in instrumental practice of college music majors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI 3327057)
15.
LehmannA.SlobodaJ.WoodyR. (2007). Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
Leon-GuerreroA. J. (2004). An examination of the self-regulation strategies used by adolescent instrumental musicians while practicing (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI 3132561)
17.
McPhersonG. E. (1995). Five aspects of musical performance and their correlates. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 115–121.
18.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33, 5–35.
19.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2000). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169–186.
20.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 327–347). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359–375.
22.
MorrisonS.DemorestS.StambaughL. (2008). Enculturation effects in music cognition: The role of age and music complexity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 118–129.
23.
NielsenS. W. (1999). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 275–291.
24.
PittsS.DavidsonJ.McPhersonG. (2000). Developing effective practice strategies: Case studies of three young instrumentalists. Music Education Research, 2, 45–56.
25.
PottengerH. (1969). An analysis of rhythm reading skill (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI 1969-02825)
26.
SlobodaJ. (1978). The psychology of music reading. Psychology of Music, 6(2), 3–20.
27.
StakeR. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
TrusheimW. H. (2010). Audiation and mental imagery: Implications for artistic performance. Visions of Research in Music Education, 16(2). (Reprinted with permission from The Quarterly, 2, 138–147; 1991). Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/v16n1/volume2/visions/spring16
