This study investigated choral singers’ comfort level using computer technology for vocal sight-reading assessment. High school choral singers (N = 138) attending a summer music camp completed a computer-based sight-reading assessment and accompanying pre- and posttest surveys on their musical backgrounds and perceptions about technology. A large majority reported both frequent sight-reading instruction (74%) and individual assessment (70%) in their prior instruction. Whereas 94% of these students previously had been assessed live, only five students had been assessed through recording and one by computer. Preassessment opinions (69% favorable/neutral) shifted substantially (69% negative) after experiencing computer-based assessment. Inability to set the tempo was cited as the predominant reason for disliking the technology. Results indicate great potential for using technology in vocal sight-reading instruction and assessment. However, it is important that students’ introduction to it be intentional and thorough. Adequate practice and comfort must be established for students to trust and appreciate this new instructional tool.
AlexanderM. (2012). Fearless improvisation: A pilot study to analyze string students’ confidence, anxiety, and attitude toward learning improvisation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 25–33. doi:10.1177/8755123312457884
2.
BowlesR. (1971). The Belwin–Mills Singing Achievement Test. New York, NY: Belwin-Mills.
3.
BoyleD.LucasK. (1990). The effect of context on sightsinging. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 106, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318858
4.
BundersonC.InouyeD.OlsenJ. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 367–407). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
5.
DemorestS. (1998). Improving sight-singing performance in the choral ensemble: The effect of individual testing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 182–192. doi:10.2307/3345622
6.
DemorestS.MayW. (1995). Sight-singing instruction in the choral ensemble: Factors related to individual performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 156–167. doi:10.2307/3345676
7.
FarnumS. (1969). Farnum String Scale: A performance scale for all string instruments. Winona, MN: Hal Leonard.
8.
HamannD. L.SobajeM. (1983). Anxiety and the college musician: A study of performance conditions and subject variables. Psychology of Music, 11, 37–50. doi:10.1177/0305735683111005
9.
HenryM. (2001, Fall). The development of a vocal sight-reading inventory. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150, 21–35. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319097
10.
HenryM. (2009, February). The development of a rhythm skills hierarchy for vocal sight-reading assessment. Research poster presented at the Texas Music Educators Association annual convention, San Antonio, TX.
11.
HenryM.DemorestS. (1994). Individual sight reading achievement in successful choral ensembles: A preliminary study. Update: Applications in Music Education, 13(1), 4–8.
12.
KillianJ. (1991). The relationship between sightsinging accuracy and error detection in junior high singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 216–224. doi:10.2307/3344721
13.
KillianJ.HenryM. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 51–65. doi:10.1177/002242940505300105
14.
KokotsakiD.DavidsonJ. W. (2003). Investigating musical performance anxiety among music college singing students: A quantitative analysis. Music Education Research, 5, 45–59. doi:10.1080/1461380032000042899
15.
KolbR. (1984). A real-time microcomputer-assisted system for translating aural, monophonic tones into music notation as an aid in sight-singing. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 93, 49–52.
16.
LarsonR. (1977). Relationships between melodic error detection, melodic dictation, and melodic sightsinging. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 264–271. doi:10.2307/3345267
LucasK. (1994). Contextual condition and sightsinging achievement of middle school choral students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 23–34. doi:10.2307/3345700
OsborneM. S.KennyD. T. (2008). The role of sensitizing experiences in music performance anxiety in adolescent musicians. Psychology of Music, 36, 447–462. doi:10.1177/0305735607086051
21.
PetersG. (1974). Feasibility of computer-assisted instruction for instrumental music education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL. Retrieved from http://vufind.carli.illinois.edu/vf-uiu/Record/uiu_6139978
22.
PlatteJ. (1981). The effects of a microcomputer-assisted instructional program on the ability of college choral ensemble members to sing melodic configurations at sight. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 04A.
23.
ScottT. (1996). The construction of a holistic, criterion-reference sightsinging test for high school sopranos based on the voluntary national standards for music education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
24.
SmithK. (2010). Perspectives on improvising in beginning string pedagogy: A description of teacher anxiety, confidence, and attitude (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kent State University, OH.
25.
WatkinsJ.FarnumS. (1962). The Watkins–Farnum Performance Scale. Winona, MN: Hal Leonard Music.
26.
Wehr-FlowersE. (2006). Differences between male and female students’ confidence, anxiety, and attitude toward learning jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 337–349. doi:10.1177/002242940605400406
