The purpose of this study was to develop a profile of an effective urban music educator in an effort to provide strategies for university teacher training programs to prepare students to teach in urban schools. The study examined urban music teachers’ (N = 158) educational background, effective and ineffective characteristics, perceived challenges, and traits needed to sustain a long-term career. Results indicated that participants who attended urban schools themselves had longer tenures in urban schools than those who had not. The greatest challenges facing urban educators included discipline, uninvolved/unsupportive parents, cultural diversity, students’ limited musical training/exposure, and unstable home environments. An effective urban music educator was described as being empathetic, patient, flexible, enthusiastic, and committed to students’ learning. Career urban music teachers were portrayed as being flexible, compassionate/caring, determined/persistent, committed to working hard, loving and respectful of students, patient, and knowledgeable. Results are discussed in terms of implications for teacher preparation.
AbrilC. R. (2006). Teaching music in urban landscapes: Three perspectives. In Frierson-CampbellC. (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom: A guide to survival, success, and reform (Vol. 1, pp. 75–98). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
2.
BellD. M. (1985). A positive approach to inner-city teaching. Music Educators Journal, 72(4), 26–29. doi:10.2307/3400519
3.
BlansonA. L. (2005). A case study of teacher retention at one urban school district (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3218339)
CallowayJ. (2009). In search of music equity in an urban middle school (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3362521)
6.
ChesterM. D.BeaudinB. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 233–257. doi:10.3102/00028312033001233
7.
Costa-GiomiE.ChappellE. (2007). Characteristics of band programs in a large urban school district: Diversity or inequality?Journal of Band Research, 42(2), 1–18.
8.
ErosJ. (2009). A case study of three urban music teachers in the second stage of their teaching careers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3354146)
9.
FieseR. K.DeCarboN. J. (1995). Urban music education. Music Educators Journal, 81(6), 27–31. doi:10.2307/3398779
10.
FitzpatrickK. (2008). A mixed methods portrait of urban instrumental music teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3303647)
11.
Frierson-CampbellC. (Ed.). (2006). Teaching music in the urban classroom: Vol. 2. A guide to leadership, teacher education, and reform. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
12.
GordonD. G. (1997). An investigation and analysis of environmental stress factors experienced by K-12 music teachers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Iowa). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 9816935)
13.
GrouixJ. G. (2001). Changing preservice teacher perceptions of minority schools. Urban Education, 36, 60–92. doi:10.1177/0042085901361005
14.
HabermanM. (1995). Star teachers of children in poverty. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.
15.
HabermanM.RickardsW. H. (1990). Urban teachers who quit: Why they leave and what they do. Urban Education, 25, 297–303. doi:10.1177/0042085990025003005
16.
HenkeR.ChenX.GeisS.KnepperP. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary teaching as of 1997 (NCES No. 2000-152). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
17.
HinckleyJ. (1995). Urban music education: Providing for students. Music Educators Journal, 82(1), 32–35. doi:10.2307/3398883
18.
HoweyK. R. (1989). RATE: Programs of teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 23–26. doi:10.1177/002248718904000605
19.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534. doi:10.3102/00028312038003499
20.
IngersollR.SmithT. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30–33.
21.
Kindall-SmithM. (2004). Teachers teaching teachers: Revitalization in an urban setting. Music Educators Journal, 91(2), 41–46. doi:10.2307/3400048
22.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62. doi:10.3102/01623737024001037
23.
LindemanC. A. (2004). Idea bank: Ten strategies for higher education and the K-12 music teacher shortage. Music Educators Journal, 90(3), 66–67. doi:10.2307/3399964
24.
MixonK. (2005). Building your instrumental music program in an urban school. Music Educators Journal, 91(3), 15–23. doi:10.2307/3400071
25.
MoirE. (2003). Launching the next generation of teachers through quality induction. Santa Cruz: New Teacher Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.
26.
Moon-MerchantV. V. (2005). A longitudinal trend study of a university-based teacher induction program: Observable behaviors of urban teachers and their perceptions of program components five years after participation (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3231563)
27.
NgJ. C. (2003). Teacher shortages in urban schools: The role of traditional and alternative certification routes in filling the voids. Education and Urban Society, 35, 380–398. doi:10.1177/0013124503255453
28.
OlsenB.AndersonL. (2007). Courses of action: A qualitative investigation into urban teacher retention and career development. Urban Education, 42, 5–29. doi:10.1177/0042085906293923
29.
QuartzK. H. (2003). “Too angry to leave”: Supporting new teachers’ commitment to transform urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 99–111. doi:10.1177/0022487102250284
30.
RenfroL. (2003). The urban teacher struggle. Teaching Music, 11(2), 36–40.
31.
RobinsonN. R. (2004). Who is “at risk” in the music classroom?Music Educators Journal, 90(4), 38–43. doi:10.2307/3399997
32.
RossD. D.SmithW. (1992). Understanding preservice teachers’ perspectives on diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 94–103. doi:10.1177/0022487192043002003
33.
SchmidtP. (2007). Discourse and enactment in teacher preparation: Music teaching, ideology and urban education (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3268203)
34.
ShannM. H. (1998). Professional commitment and satisfaction among teachers in urban middle schools. Journal of Educational Research, 92(2), 67–73. doi:10.1080/00220679809597578
35.
SmithJ. (2006). The challenges of urban teaching: Young urban music educators at work. In Frierson-CampbellC. (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom: A guide to survival, success, and reform (Vol. 1, pp. 57–74). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
WeinerL. (2000). Research in the 90s: Implications for urban teacher preparation. Review of Educational Research, 70, 369–406. doi:10.3102/00346543070003369
38.
WilsonS. M.FlodenR. E.Ferrini-MundyJ. (2001, February). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendation. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
