In 1997, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990 was amended to require that assistive technology be considered when preparing an individual education program (IEP). This study explored involvement of Midwestern music educators in the IEP development process as well as their knowledge and attitudes regarding use of assistive technology in teaching students with disabilities. Music educators reported that they continue to have a low level of self-reported involvement in educational planning for students with disabilities. Although music educators recognize the utility of assistive technology, their knowledge base remains limited. Music educators identified the need for better preparation to teach students with disabilities as well as improved interdisciplinary collaboration.
Atterbury, B.W. ( 1986a). Success in the mainstream of general music. Music Educators Journal, 72(7), 34-36.
2.
Atterbury, B.W. ( 1986b). A survey of present mainstreaming practices in the southern United States. Journal of Music Therapy, 23, 202-207.
3.
Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. ( 2002). Teacher’s attitudes towards integrations/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 129-147.
4.
Blackhurst, A.E. ( 1997). Perspectives on technology in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(5), 41-48.
5.
Bryant, B.R., & Seay, P.C. ( 1998). The Technology-Related Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities Act: Relevance to individuals with learning disabilities and their advocates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 4-15.
6.
Bryant, D.P., & Bryant, B.R. ( 2003). Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.R., & Raskind, M.H. ( 1998). Using assistive technology to enhance the skills of students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic , 34, 53-58.
8.
Cavalier, A.R., Ferretti, R.P., & Okolo, C.M. ( 1994). Technology and individual differences. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(3), 175-181.
9.
Colwell, C.M., & Thompson, L.K. (2000). "Inclusion" of information on mainstreaming in undergraduate music education curricula. Journal of Music Therapy, 37, 205-221.
10.
Darrow, A.A. ( 1999). Music educators’ perceptions regarding the inclusion of students with severe disabilities in music classrooms. Journal of Music Therapy, 36, 254-273.
11.
Fink, A. ( 2002). The survey kit (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Frisque, J., Niebur, L., & Humphreys, J. ( 1994). Music mainstreaming practices in Arizona. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 94-104.
13.
Gfeller, K., Darrow, A.A., & Hedden, S.K. ( 1988). Perceived effectiveness of mainstreaming in Iowa and Kansas schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 90-101.
14.
Gilbert, J.P., & Asmus, E.P. ( 1981). Mainstreaming music educators’ participation and professional needs. Journal of Research in Music Education , 29, 31-37.
15.
Gregory, D. ( 2002). Assistive technology for computer-based music instruction . Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1(2), 15-23.
16.
Heller, L. ( 1995). Undergraduate music teacher preparation for mainstreaming: A survey of music education teacher training institutions in the Great Lakes region of the United States. (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University , 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International , 56, 858A.
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. ( 1997).
18.
Lewis, R.B. ( 1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications . Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
19.
Puckett, K. ( 2004). Project ACCESS: Field testing an assistive technology toolkit for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 5-17.
20.
Raskind, M.H., & Higgins, E.L. ( 1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 31, 27-40.
21.
Smith, S.J., & Jones, E.D. ( 1999). The obligation to provide assistive technology: Enhancing general curriculum access. Journal of Law and Education, 28, 247-265.
22.
Soodak, L.C., Podell, D.M., & Lehman, L.R. ( 1998). Teacher, student, and school attributes as predictors of teachers’ responses to inclusion. Journal of Special Education, 31, 480-497.
23.
Thompson, J.R., Siegel, J., & Kouzoukas, S. ( 2000). Assistive technology on the eve of the 21st century: Teacher perceptions. Special Education Technology Practice , 2(3), 12-21.
24.
Wall, R. ( 2002). Teachers’ exposure to people with visual impairments and the effect on attitudes toward inclusion. RE:view, 34, 111-119.
25.
Watts, E.H., Thompson, J.R., & Wojcik, B.W. ( 2003, April). Tub O’Tools: Technology that teachers of students with disabilities need. Juried presentation at the 2003 Council for Exceptional Children annual convention, Seattle, WA.
26.
White, L.D. ( 1981-1982). Study of the attitudes of selected public school music educators toward the integration of handicapped students in music classes . Contributions to Music Education, 9, 36-47.
