Digoxin Immune Fab Administration following an Unexplained Increase in Serum Digoxin Concentration

Abstract

Objective:

To report a case of digoxin immune Fab (DIF) administration following an unexplained increase in serum digoxin concentration in an asymptomatic patient with chronic renal failure.

Case Summary:

A 70-year-old man presented to the hospital with congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic renal failure, and suspected digoxin toxicity. By day 3, he developed a more stable cardiac rhythm with nodal beats. His last known digoxin dose was 12 hours prior to admission. No explanation for an elevated serum digoxin concentration 48 hours after admission could be found. Despite absence of other signs of digoxin toxicity, DIF 80 mg iv was administered, and was immediately followed by 40 mg.

Discussion:

This case illustrates that elevated digoxin concentrations may be observed in patients with renal failure. These may not be true high concentrations because of the following potential factors: (1) the presence of digoxin-like factors, (2) increased biotransformation of digoxin, and (3) accumulation of metabolites that interfere with the assay. Digoxin metabolites are known to cross-react with the antibodies in commonly used digoxin immunoassays, and may be inappropriately interpreted to signal digoxin toxicity. Both the accuracy and reliability of digoxin immunoassay techniques have been questioned or challenged over the years. It is difficult to determine whether a reported toxic serum digoxin concentration represents the true concentration or cross-reactivity between digoxin metabolites and antibodies used in most digoxin immunoassays.

Data Sources:

Data collection sources included retrospective review of patient medical records, personal contact with one of the physicians involved in rendering patient care for interpretation of the electrocardiogram changes, clinical symptoms and rationale for DIF administration, and contact with the immunoassay technologist, who indicated that the fluorescence polarization immunoassay technique was used for analysis of digoxin concentrations. The medical literature then was reviewed.

Conclusions:

DIF should be reserved for use in symptomatic patients. Elevated digoxin concentrations must be evaluated for various factors that can cause falsely elevated values. Clinical signs and symptoms are critical in making the decision to use Fab. Antidotal measures should be based on correlation of patient symptoms with serum digoxin concentrations.