Background: Patients with mental health disorders experience difficulty in selecting treatments. With a paternalistic approach, patients are not offered an opportunity to provide input. Shared decision making (SDM) occurs when providers and patients collaborate on informed treatment decisions. Research on psychiatric providers’ perceptions toward SDM is limited. Objective: This pilot study aimed to determine psychiatric providers’ willingness to engage in SDM and factors that influence willingness. Methods: This cross-sectional, self-report study measured willingness, attitude, experiences, and barriers related to SDM as well as demographic/practice characteristics. A survey was e-mailed to psychiatric providers at 3 psychiatric institutions. Results: Out of 80 providers e-mailed, 29 (36.3%) responded. Providers had a favorable attitude toward SDM (3.26 ± 0.24, range = 1-4) and a high willingness to use SDM (3.43 ± 0.50, range = 1-4). The most common SDM methods were discussions (96.6%) and written material (89.7%). Common perceived barriers included limited patient capacity (86.2%) and limited time with patient (62.1%). Current SDM users (3.46 ± 0.51) had a higher willingness to engage in SDM than noncurrent users (3.00 ± 0.00), t = 4.63, df = 25.0, P < .001. Attitude and willingness were positively related (r = .62, P < .001). Attitude did not vary based on demographic/practice characteristics. Conclusions: Willingness to use SDM was positively related to a favorable attitude toward SDM. Larger, geographically diverse, randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to evaluate the willingness of psychiatric providers to conduct SDM.
Center for Mental Health Services. Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care: Practice, Research, and Future Directions (HHS Publication No. SMA-09-4371). Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2010.
2.
De las CuevasCRivero-SantanaAPerestelo-PerezLPerez-RamosJSerrano-AguilarP. Attitudes toward concordance in psychiatry: a comparative, cross-sectional study of psychiatric patients and mental health professionals. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:53. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-53.
3.
HorneR; National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation (Great Britain). Concordance, Adherence and Compliance in Medicine Taking. (Report for the National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D [NCCSDO]). London, Engoand: NCCSDO; 2005.
4.
De las CuevasC. Towards a clarification of terminology in medicine-taking behaviour: compliance, adherence and concordance are related although different terms with different uses. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2011;6:74-77. doi:10.2174/157488411796151110
5.
De las CuevasCRivero-SantanaAPerestelo-PerezL. Mental health professionals’ attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: a validation study of the Leeds Attitude to Concordance Scale II. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21:123-129. doi:10.1002/pds.2240.
6.
DeeganPEDrakeRE. Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:1636-1639. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1636.
7.
PatelSRBakkenSRulandC. Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21:606-612. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830eb6b4.
8.
CharlesCGafniAWhelanT. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or, it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681-692. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3.
AppelbaumPSRedlichA. Impact of decisional capacity on the use of leverage to encourage treatment adherence. Community Ment Health J. 2006;42:121-130. doi:10.1007/s10597-005-9015-6.
11.
CleverSLFordDERubensteinLV. Primary care patients’ involvement in decision making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care. 2006;44:398-403. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000208117.15531.da.
12.
PerkinsMBJensenPSJaccardJ. Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians’ behavior: what do we know?Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:342-348. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.3.342.
13.
AjzenI. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum. 1991;50:179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
14.
GoosensenAZijlstraPKoopmanschapM. Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:50-56. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.017.
15.
SealeCChaplinRLelliottPQuirkA. Sharing decisions in consultations involving antipsychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists’ experiences. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2861-2873. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.002.
16.
LohASimonDHennigKHennigBElwynG. The assessment of depressive patients’ involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:314-318. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.006.
17.
FordSSchofieldTHopeT. Barriers to the evidence-based patient choice (EBPC) consultation. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47:179-185. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00198-7.
18.
KnappPRaynorDKThistlethwaiteJEJonesMB. A questionnaire to measure health practitioners’ attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: LATCon II. Health Expect. 2009;12:175-186. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00545.x.
19.
GravelKLégaréFGrahamID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:16. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-16.
