Abstract
Objective:
To review published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of escitalopram.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Health Star, and Ovid Journals databases were searched using escitalopram, cost, cost-effectiveness, and economics as search terms. All articles and abstracts published from January 2003 to April 2006 were reviewed and cross-referenced for possible exclusions or duplications. Searches were not limited to English-language publications.
Study Selection and Data Extraction:
One prospective economic study and 10 studies using decision analytical models assessing the cost-effectiveness of escitalopram compared with citalopram and/or venlafaxine were identified and reviewed.
Data Synthesis:
Pharmacoeconomic studies using country-specific currency economic analysis from Europe and Canada have been conducted assessing the cost-effectiveness of escitalopram in major depression. Several studies have shown escitalopram to be more cost-effective compared with citalopram, with cost savings identified in societal and healthcare system perspectives. However, the cost-effectiveness of escitalopram was less significant when compared with venlafaxine.
Conclusions:
Economic studies suggest that escitalopram is cost-effective compared with citalopram in treatment of major depression, but has marginal advantage compared with venlafaxine.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
