Investigation of Consumer Choice of Community,Mail Order,or Internet Pharmacies

Abstract

Background:

The 3 major options for purchase of medications by consumers are community pharmacy, mail order pharmacy, and Internet pharmacy. Certain consumer characteristics and motivating factors may be related to the type of pharmacy a person chooses to patronize.

Objective:

To describe and compare consumers who use Internet pharmacy versus those who choose community or mail order pharmacy and identify and compare the motivating factors for the use or lack of use of Internet versus community or mail order pharmacies.

Methods:

Two hundred seventy-eight residents of a major Midwest city were surveyed by mail questionnaire. A total of 91 responses were received, yielding a response rate of 32.7%. Descriptive statistics and Kendall's W coefficient of concordance were performed to analyze the respondents' answers.

Results:

Internet pharmacy patrons, compared with community pharmacy and mail order pharmacy patrons, were more likely to be male, younger, white, married, wealthier, and more educated. Respondents using Internet pharmacy listed quality and convenience as highly ranked factors in choosing a pharmacy, while respondents using community pharmacy listed quality and reliability and those using mail order pharmacy ranked reliability and convenience most highly.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that characteristics and motivating factors may differ for customers who choose Internet pharmacy instead of community or mail order pharmacy. As this study was exploratory in nature, additional studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Solomon

. Consumer behavior. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.

Erdem

Chandra

. E-commerce in healthcare and pharmaceutical marketing opportunities and concerns. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs 2003; 20: 399–407.

A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. February 2002.

Greenspan

Web swallows chunk of prescription sales. http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3111481 (accessed 2004 Feb 26).

Cohen

. The menace or blessing of internet pharmacy? Some public policy considerations. J Pharm Market Manage 2004; 16: 5–11.

Griller

Internet pharmacy: Undoing Canada's goals for life science innovation?

J Pharm Market Manage 2004; 16: 63–9.

Crawford

. Internet pharmacy: Issues of access, quality, costs and regulation. J Med Sys 2003; 27: 57–65.

Oliver

. Internet pharmacies: Regulation of a growing industry. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2000; 28: 98–101.

West

. Online pharmacies: Implications for the future. Drug Topics 2000;(May):83–90.

10.

Lazarus

Morse

. Despite security concerns, optimism abounds on the net. Managed Healthcare 2000;(Sept):30–2.

11.

Ovaskainen

. Internet pharmacies: Advantages and risks. WHO Drug Information 2001; 15: 149–51.

12.

Bloom

Iannacone

. Internet availability of prescription pharmaceuticals to the public. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 830–3.

13.

Dupuits

FMHM

. The effects of the internet on pharmaceutical consumers and providers. Disease Management & Health Outcome 2002; 10: 679–91.

14.

Hawkins

Best

Coney

. Consumer behavior: building marketing strategy. 8th ed. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2001.

15.

Blackwell

Miniard

Engel

. Consumer behavior. 9th ed. New York: South Western/Thomson Learning, 2001.

16.

Granbois

An integrated view of the store choice/patronage process. In: Monroe

, ed. Advances in consumer research. Vol. 8. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 1981: 693–5.

17.

Jacoby

Mazursky

Impact of linking brand and retailer images on perceptions of quality. In: Jacoby

Olson

, eds. Perceived quality: how consumers view stores and merchandise. Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Co., 1985: 155–9.

18.

Olshavsky

. Perceived quality in consumer decision making: An integrated theoretical perspective. In: Jacoby

Olson

, eds. Perceived quality: how consumers view stores and merchandise. Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Co., 1985: 3–29.

19.

Johnson

Coons

Hays

Sabers

Jones

Langley

. A comparison of satisfaction with mail versus traditional pharmacy services. J Manage Care Pharm 1997; 3: 327–37.

20.

Zbar

. Pharmacies surge online. Advertising Age 2000; 17: 58.

21.

Wagner

Alonso

Mehlorn

. Comparison of internet and community pharmacies. Ann Pharmacother 2001; 35: 116–9. DOI 10.1345/aph.10090

22.

Koller

. Expanding online pharmacies encounter growing pains. Drug Store News 2000; 22: 48.

23.

Winter

Balza

Caro

, Medicare prescription drug coverage: Consumer information and preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006; 103: 7929–34.

24.

Duke

Raube

Lipton

. Patient-assistance programs: Assessment of and use by safety-net clinics. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62: 726–31.

25.

Nua Internet Surveys. Pharmacies flop online. www.nua.ie/surveys/index (accessed 2000 Oct 24).

26.

Carroll

Fincham

. Elderly consumers' views of community and mail-order pharmacies. J Pharm Market Manage 1992; 6: 3–20.

27.

Sudman

Blair

Marketing research: a problem-solving approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill Co., 1998: 398.

28.

SPSS Inc. SPSS-X User's Guide, 3rd Edition. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc; 1988.

29.

Churchill

. Marketing research. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Dryden Press, 1987.

30.

Nunnally

. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

31.

American community survey. 2002. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, September 2003.

32.

Falling through the net: toward digital inclusion. A report on Americans' access to technology tools. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. Economic and Statistics Administration. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, October 2000.

33.

Loges

Jung

. Exploring the digital divide: Internet connectedness and age. Commun Res 2001; 28: 536–62.

34.

National Association of Boards of Pharmacy VIPPS Verification Web site. www.nabp.net/index.html?target=/vipps/intro.asp (accessed 2006 Jun 29).