Abstract
The development of pubertal characteristics may be influenced by exogenous factors, including endocrine disruptors. Phytoestrogens, plant-derived compounds with estrogenic activity, have been studied for their potential impact on pubertal timing. This scoping review assessed the available evidence on the association between dietary phytoestrogen consumption and early pubertal development. A systematic search of 5 databases identified 16 studies: 1 clinical trial, 3 experimental animal studies, and 12 observational studies. Study designs and methodological quality were heterogeneous. Prospective cohort studies, offering higher-quality evidence, reported an inverse association between phytoestrogen intake and early pubertal development, while cross-sectional studies of lower quality found a direct association. Although findings are inconsistent, the best-quality evidence suggests that phytoestrogen consumption may delay pubertal onset. Further research with robust designs and standardized measures is required to clarify this relationship.
Introduction
The development of pubertal characteristics, such as breast budding, pubarche, and menarche in girls, and testicular enlargement and pubarche in boys, is a complex biological process influenced by both genetic and environmental factors.1,2 While the typical age range for pubertal onset varies, there has been increasing concern over the earlier emergence of these characteristics in recent decades. 2 This trend, often referred to as early pubertal development, may not always meet the clinical definition of precocious puberty—characterized by onset before the age of 8 in girls and 9 in boys—but it raises important health considerations. 3
Early pubertal timing has been associated with long-term health implications, including an elevated risk of polycystic ovary syndrome, breast cancer, insulin resistance, reduced adult height relative to genetic potential, and menstrual disturbances in adulthood.4,5 Several environmental factors, particularly exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals found in insecticides, plastics, personal care products, cosmetics, and certain foods, have been proposed as potential contributors to this shift.6,7
Plant-based foods with high estrogen content, known as phytoestrogens, 8 have attracted attention for their potential health benefits, especially in peri- and postmenopausal women, due to their capacity to alleviate hot flashes, help maintain bone mass, and possibly reduce the risk of breast and prostate cancer. 9 However, the effects of phytoestrogen exposure during early life remain controversial, particularly regarding their potential influence on the timing of pubertal development.9,10
Phytoestrogens are present in various plant-based foods, including soy and its derivatives (soy milk, tofu, flour, among others), flaxseeds, alfalfa, and fennel. Through their selective activity on estrogen receptors, particularly ER-β, phytoestrogens may influence pathways involved in sexual maturation. While their biological effects do not necessarily involve changes in circulating hormone levels—given that prepubertal levels of estradiol, LH, and FSH are naturally low—they may exert modulatory effects on estrogen-sensitive tissues. 11 Nevertheless, the relationship between phytoestrogen intake and the timing of pubertal development remains a topic of scientific debate. Therefore, this study aims to synthesize and evaluate the available evidence on this association through a systematic scoping review.
Methods
Study Design
This scoping review aimed to summarize the evidence on the relationship between phytoestrogen-containing food consumption and the development of pubertal characteristics. The review followed the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute’s manual for scoping reviews 12 and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. 13 The protocol was registered on the Figshare platform before its implementation. 14
Information Sources and Search Strategy
The search was conducted in 5 bibliographic databases: Web of Science (Core Collection), SCOPUS, Embase via Ovid, PubMed/MEDLINE, and EBSCO Host. The search was performed on April 15, 2024, using terms related to “phytoestrogens,” “isoflavones,” “soy,” “precocious puberty,” “early puberty,” “puberty timing,” and “early menarche.” The search strategy was adapted for each database, and the specific strategies are provided in the Supplemental Material. Additionally, a manual search of references from narrative reviews and clinical guidelines was conducted to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant documents.
Document Selection
The document selection process was conducted using Rayyan 15 based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers (GT-S and LU-C) evaluated the studies. In cases of disagreement regarding study inclusion or exclusion, a third reviewer (VR-L) made the final decision.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Studies were included if they reported original results from observational studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies), experimental studies (human or animal trials), or case reports. Additionally, studies were required to provide clear descriptions of phytoestrogen exposure (type of food and quantity) and development of pubertal characteristics (breast development, menarche, pubarche, testicular size, Tanner staging, or serologically confirmed early puberty or signs suggestive of early pubertal development).
Secondary studies, such as clinical practice guidelines or narrative reviews, were excluded. Studies involving pregnant women or those in which phytoestrogen exposure occurred exclusively during gestation were also excluded. Furthermore, studies published before the year 2000 and those without full-text availability were not considered (Figure 1).

Flowchart of article selection for the scoping review according to PRISMA guidelines.
Data Extraction
Two independent authors (VR-L and DP-L) extracted the relevant data to ensure information quality. The extracted data included the study title, authors, publication year, study type (observational, experimental, or case report), specific study design (randomized clinical trial, non-randomized clinical trial, animal experiment or preclinical study, cross-sectional study, cohort study, case-control study, or case report), country where the study was conducted, data collection period, study population, sample characteristics and size, study objective, methodology, phytoestrogen administration or exposure (type of food, quantity, and duration), and primary outcomes (absolute frequencies, relative frequencies, means, medians, and association measures).
Quality Assessment of Evidence
Three independent authors (AÑ-C, GT-S, and VR-L) assessed the quality of evidence in human studies. The Risk of Bias II (RoB II) tool was used to evaluate randomized clinical trials. 16 For observational studies, a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied, assigning quality ratings as follows: low quality (1-3 stars), moderate quality (4-6 stars), and high quality (7-9 stars). 17 A detailed evaluation of each study is available in the Supplemental Material.
Study Synthesis
The collected information was summarized in tables that included bibliographic details, methodological aspects, and study results.
Ethical Considerations
This study was conducted using publicly available published data. No personal or confidential patient information was disclosed. Therefore, ethical committee approval was not required.
Results
A total of 16 studies were included, comprising 12 observational and 4 experimental studies, all published between 2001 and 2022. Specifically, the review identified 2 experimental studies in humans, 2 experimental studies in animals, 4 cross-sectional studies, and 5 cohort studies. Additionally, 7 of the included studies were conducted in the United States (Table 1).
General Characteristics of the Selected Studies Addressing the Relationship Between Phytoestrogen Consumption and Early Puberty Development.
Abbreviations: USA, United States of America; UK, United Kingdom.
Among the experimental studies, a randomized controlled trial was conducted in Colombia with 51 children aged 7 to 9 years attending community dining facilities. The intervention group received a soy-based supplement (3.49 mg of isoflavones per day) for 12 months, while the control group received a whole milk-based formula. The results showed no significant differences in sexual maturation between the intervention and control groups. However, the study was classified as having moderate evidence quality based on the RoB II tool.
In addition to this study, a pre- and post-intervention study in children reported no significant results, while 2 preclinical animal studies observed anatomical and physiological differences suggestive of early pubertal development. Details are summarized in Table 2.
Objectives, Methodology, and Results of the Included Experimental Studies on the Relationship Between Phytoestrogen Consumption and Early Puberty Development.
The quality of evidence was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, yielding a moderate quality rating.
Among the 12 observational studies, 5 were cohort studies (4 prospective and 1 retrospective), 4 were cross-sectional studies, 2 were case-control studies, and 1 was a case series (including 4 cases). Four studies reported an association between phytoestrogen consumption and earlier sexual development (1 case-control study, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 1 case series). Five studies found no association between phytoestrogen intake and pubertal development (1 retrospective cohort study, 1 prospective cohort study, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 1 case-control study). Meanwhile, 3 prospective cohort studies suggested a relationship between phytoestrogen consumption and delayed sexual development.
Only 2 studies, both prospective cohort studies, were rated as having high-quality evidence (Table 3). The methodological quality assessment of the observational studies (excluding the case series, n = 11) classified 4 studies as low quality, 5 as moderate quality, and 2 as high quality. The detailed quality assessment for each domain is provided in the Supplemental Material.
Objectives, Methodology, Results, and Evidence Quality of the Included Observational Studies on the Relationship Between Phytoestrogen Consumption and Early Puberty Development.
Details on the evaluation and justification of the evidence quality scores are provided in the complementary material.
Although the study mentions a mixed cross-sectional design, the results follow a cross-sectional approach.
Discussion
This study analyzed various investigations related to the objective of synthesizing current evidence on phytoestrogen consumption and its potential association with early development puberty. Overall, the included studies exhibited significant heterogeneity in design, contradictory findings, and varying levels of evidence.
Studies suggesting a relationship between phytoestrogen intake and early development puberty generally had low to moderate evidence quality. First, animal model experiments conducted by Takashima-Sasaki et al 20 and Bateman and Patisaul 21 reported an association between phytoestrogen exposure and early pubertal development in rats and primates. These findings align with those of other studies22-24 that have used various animal models to assess the effects of parenteral administration of flavonoids, isoflavones, or genistein. However, due to the inherent limitations of animal models, extrapolating these results to humans remains challenging,25,26 particularly because the administered doses in these experiments are often significantly higher than those typically consumed in a regular diet. In this regard, a key strength of the studies by Takashima-Sasaki et al and Bateman and Patisaul is their use of enteral diets in animal models, which could serve as a foundation for designing future human studies with a more robust hypothesis.
Regarding human studies, 2 experimental studies did not identify a relationship between phytoestrogen consumption and precocious puberty. One was a pre- and post-intervention study, 27 while the other was a randomized clinical trial. 28 However, both studies had methodological limitations, including small sample sizes. Randomized clinical trials represent the optimal design for establishing causal relationships between exposure and outcomes; however, their validity depends on methodological rigor and study design quality. 29 Conducting additional randomized trials would help mitigate confounding bias present in observational studies. However, the ethical implications of assessing potential “risk factors” in experimental human studies must be carefully considered. 30
The pre- and post-intervention study also had a short follow-up period, which limits the ability to extrapolate long-term results. Additionally, this study design has inherent methodological constraints. 31
Observational studies have shown heterogeneous and, in some cases, contradictory results. Among the studies suggesting an association between phytoestrogen consumption and precocious puberty or early development puberty,32-35 methodological quality ranged from low to moderate based on the corresponding assessment tools. In contrast, prospective cohort studies have reported an inverse relationship between phytoestrogen intake and pubertal onset.36-38 It is important to highlight that both Mervish et al 37 and Xiong et al 38 provided high-quality evidence due to their large sample sizes and longitudinal follow-up. Xiong et al observed delayed puberty in both sexes with higher soy intake, while Mervish et al found that greater flavonol consumption was associated with a later onset of breast development in girls. Together, these findings suggest that specific phytoestrogens may have a protective or modulatory effect on pubertal timing. The discrepancy between observational studies may be explained by the SERM activity of phytoestrogens, with effects influenced by ER-α/ER-β affinity, dose, bioavailability, 39 and gut microbiota–dependent metabolism, including equol production. 40 However, the highest-quality evidence indicates that phytoestrogen consumption is inversely associated with early pubertal development.
The timing of exposure also plays a crucial role: while phytoestrogens may modulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis during early childhood, they can alter hormone levels in later stages closer to puberty. 41 Furthermore, the dose-response relationship does not appear to be linear; low and prolonged exposures may have protective effects, whereas high and short-term exposures could accelerate pubertal development. External factors, such as exposure to other endocrine disruptors and nutritional status, may further modify these effects, contributing to the variability observed across studies.42,43
On the other hand, the consumption of foods rich in isoflavones, such as soy, has demonstrated protective effects against chronic diseases and menopausal symptoms, along with potential benefits in breast cancer prevention.44-46 However, the effects of phytoestrogen consumption during childhood remain uncertain.47,48 Some studies suggest that an intake below 40 mg/day or 3-4 mg/kg/day in children may not have direct repercussions, whereas higher intakes could lead to variable effects depending on physiological and individual contexts.
Compounds such as daidzein, genistein, and circulating isoflavones have been well-studied due to their specific affinities for estrogen receptors, particularly ER-β, potentially influencing sexual development. 49 The role of other endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, and organochlorine pesticides, must also be considered as potential confounders that may interact synergistically or antagonistically with phytoestrogens. Importantly, phytoestrogen metabolism—especially the conversion of daidzein to the potent metabolite equol by certain gut microbiota—can significantly affect estrogenic activity. 50 Measuring serum concentrations, such as plasma genistein levels above 10-15 μg/L, may help clarify dose-response relationships and improve the interpretation of phytoestrogen effects on pubertal development. 51
Strengths and Limitations
This study has several strengths, including its methodological rigor and comprehensive search strategy, which utilizes high-coverage, scientifically relevant databases. Additionally, the quality of the included studies was assessed using standardized tools based on their methodological design. The research question was clearly defined, allowing for a systematic collection of information without restricting the measurement approach for the independent variable, thereby ensuring broader data coverage.
However, certain limitations must be considered. The inclusion of studies with heterogeneous designs prevented the establishment of a precise relationship between phytoestrogen consumption and pubertal development. Moreover, the methods used to measure phytoestrogen intake varied, including assessments based on habitual dietary patterns, populations with significantly high consumption, and direct intervention studies, which complicated the standardization of the independent variable. Notably, the use of food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) has inherent limitations, as they rely on self-reported data and retrospective recall, making them susceptible to information bias and potentially compromising the accuracy of dietary exposure assessment.
Furthermore, the outcome measurement was not uniform across the analyzed studies, ranging from Tanner staging to various anthropometric parameters. This variability, along with inadequate adjustments for potential confounders, limited the validity of the results. Finally, as this review was narrative rather than a meta-analysis, the synthesis relied on describing findings from individual studies rather than generating an overall measure of association, which was due to the high heterogeneity of the data.
Therefore, future studies with more robust designs are needed to better identify the association between phytoestrogen consumption and precocious puberty, particularly by considering the quantity and type of food consumed before the onset of pubertal characteristics. Long-term follow-up studies could provide more robust answers, particularly in children with cow’s milk protein allergies. However, such studies would involve a highly specific population, thereby limiting the generalizability of their findings to the broader population. Additionally, other dietary components, such as the intake of animal-based foods, may raise important questions for future research, particularly given the conflicting evidence regarding the effects of animal proteins—such as cow’s milk 52 and red meat53,54—on pubertal development.
Conclusion
The reviewed studies present contradictory findings regarding the relationship between phytoestrogen consumption and early puberty development. While some studies suggest a positive association, others find no evidence of such a relationship or even report a slight delay in the onset of sexual characteristics. This variability in findings may stem from differences in study design, phytoestrogen intake measurement, and pubertal development assessment.
Given the heterogeneity of the available evidence, further high-quality studies are essential. These should include precise quantification of phytoestrogen intake and standardized measurement of early puberty development. Additionally, better control of confounding factors that may influence this association is necessary to obtain more consistent conclusions regarding the impact of phytoestrogens on pubertal development.
Supplemental Material
sj-pdf-1-gph-10.1177_30502225251361989 – Supplemental material for Phytoestrogenic Food Intake and the Early Development of Pubertal Characteristics: A Scoping Review and Evidence Assessment
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-gph-10.1177_30502225251361989 for Phytoestrogenic Food Intake and the Early Development of Pubertal Characteristics: A Scoping Review and Evidence Assessment by Diana Palma-Lozano, Gustavo Tapia-Sequeiros, Leonardo J. Uribe-Cavero, Alvaro M. Ñaña-Cordova and Victor Roman-Lazarte in Sage Open Pediatrics
Footnotes
Ethical Considerations
This study was conducted using publicly available published data. No personal or confidential patient information was disclosed. Therefore, ethical committee approval was not required.
Author Contributions
Diana Palma-Lozano: contributed to conception and design; contributed to acquisition and analysis; drafted manuscript; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. Gustavo Tapia-Sequeiros: contributed to design; contributed to analysis and interpretation; drafted manuscript; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. Leonardo J. Uribe-Cavero: contributed to design; contributed to analysis; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. Alvaro M. Ñaña-Cordova: contributed to analysis; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. Victor Roman-Lazarte: contributed to conception and design; contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafted manuscript; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the authors.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data Availability Statement
The pre-selected articles are included as supplementary material.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
