Social enterprises are gaining increased attention from both scholars and practitioners due to their unique ability to pursue profit alongside their social missions. However, maintaining a balance between these two objectives requires innovation for sustainability. This entails employing various forms of innovation, such as open innovation, eco-innovation, green innovation, and social innovation (SI), to address potential conflicts between financial and social priorities. This study aims to investigate the innovation practices for sustainability adopted by social enterprises and understand how these innovation capabilities operate within organizations. The data were collected from 97 for-profit social enterprises in Coimbatore city using a purposive sampling method. Utilizing the partial least squares approach for data analysis, the research findings underscore the crucial role of SI in achieving business sustainability. Additionally, the study confirms the significant impact of eco-innovation on business sustainability. These results emphasize the significance of innovation capabilities in enabling social entrepreneurs to sustain their businesses and enhance their competitive edge, thereby benefiting policymakers, business support organizations, and aspiring social entrepreneurs. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering empirical insights into sustainability innovation within the context of social enterprises, an area that has received limited attention in previous studies.
AboelmagedM. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of eco-innovation, environmental orientation and supplier collaboration on hotel performance: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.235
2.
AcsZ. J., AudretschD. B., & LehmannE. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9
3.
AdamsR., & AlarifiA. (2021). Innovation practices for survival of social enterprises in the UK: A hybrid approach. Sustainability, 13(9), 4861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094861
4.
AdamsR., JeanrenaudS., BessantJ., DenyerD., & OveryP. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
5.
AmaleshwariU. A., & JeevithaR. (2023). Entrepreneurial orientation and circular business practices: A conceptual framework. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 14(2), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.47914/jmpp.2023.v14i2.003
6.
AsadM., AnwarM., KashifM., & KhanA. (2024). Green innovation strategies and sustainable entrepreneurship: Challenges for start-ups in emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118165
7.
BansalP., & DesJardineM. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265
8.
BansalP., & RothK. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
9.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
10.
BastidaR., MarimonF., & CarrerasA. (2022). How empathy and social motivation influence social innovation. Journal of Business Research, 139, 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.024
11.
BattilanaJ., & LeeM. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
12.
BattilanaJ., SengulM., PacheA. C., & ModelJ. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0903
13.
BigliardiB., & FilippelliS. (2022). Open innovation and sustainability in manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.019
14.
BigliardiB., PetroniA., & FilippelliS. (2021). Open innovation in social enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120507
15.
ChenY. S., LaiS. B., & WenC. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
16.
ChengC. C. J. (2020). Sustainability orientation, green supplier involvement, and green innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121734
17.
ChesbroughH. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
18.
ChesbroughH., & BogersM. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In ChesbroughH., VanhaverbekeW., & WestJ. (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press.
19.
DawsonP., & DanielL. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033125
20.
DohertyB., HaughH., & LyonF. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
21.
DoradoS., & FernándezA. (2019). Social enterprises as learning environments for enterprising children. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 955–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3443-x
22.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Capstone Publishing.
23.
EtikanI., MusaS. A., & AlkassimR. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
24.
FernandoY., JabbourC. J. C., & WahW. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter?Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.001
25.
FerrarisA., & GriecoC. (2015). The role of social innovation in changing the field of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2015.1032263
26.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
27.
FusslerC., & JamesP. (1996). Driving eco-innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. Pitman Publishing.
28.
GalindoM. Á., MéndezM. T., & AlfaroJ. L. (2016). Entrepreneurship, income distribution and economic growth. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-014-0346-4
29.
GriloS., & MoreiraA. C. (2022). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: Discovering the role of value co-creation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1823870
30.
GuoH., TangJ., SuZ., & KatzJ. A. (2020). Opportunity recognition and SME performance: The mediating effect of business model innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(3), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659674
31.
HairJ. F.Jr., HultG. T. M., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
32.
HanayshaJ. R., HilmanH., & Abdul-GhaniN. H. (2022). Innovation capabilities and sustainable firm performance: A study among SMEs in Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(12), 7393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127393
33.
HarsantoB., & PermanaY. D. (2019). Innovation for sustainability performance in Indonesian SMEs: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2018-0042
34.
HockertsK. (2015). How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities. California Management Review, 57(3), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.83
35.
HorbachJ., RammerC., & RenningsK. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact: The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
36.
HussainN., RigoniU., & OrijR. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
37.
JavedM., AbdullahI., ZaffarM. A., & ul HaqM. Z. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management Development, 38(6), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2018-0263
38.
JoH., KimH., & ParkK. (2015). Eco-innovation for sustainability: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 7(12), 16882–16903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215843
39.
KuoT. C., & SmithS. (2018). A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for environmental sustainability: What is missing?Environmental Engineering Science, 35(10), 1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.0028
40.
LittlewoodD., & KhanZ. (2018). Insights from hybrid organizing and social enterprise to improve the inclusivity of sustainable development. Sustainability, 10(8), 2633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082633
41.
MarschinskiR., & BehrleS. (2009). The climate policy of the EU: A case of leadership by example?Climate Policy, 9(6), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0631
42.
MartinezM. A., Rodríguez-PomedaJ., & VicarioB. (2015). Social responsibility and its effects on the competitive success of social enterprises. Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC, 19(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reimke.2015.03.001
MunozP., CacciottiG., & CohenB. (2020). The double-edged sword of purpose-driven behavior in social entrepreneurship: Exploring the risks and rewards. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(5), 105969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105969
45.
OECD. (2009). Eco-innovation in industry: Enabling green growth. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264077225-en
46.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
47.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
48.
RavazzoliE., MarangonF., PriviteraD., & MarinoD. (2021). Social innovation for sustainable development: How social practices foster sustainability. Sustainability, 13(9), 4914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094914
49.
RenningsK. (2000). Redefining innovation: Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
50.
SanusiA., OpeyemiM., & AdeniranT. (2017). Social innovation and sustainability in Nigerian social enterprises. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 19(1), 63–75.
51.
ShahzadF., LuqmanR. A., KhanA. R., & ShabbirM. (2020). Impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320–328.
52.
SomwetheeP., AujirapongpanS., & Ru-ZhueJ. (2023). The influence of entrepreneurial capability and innovation capability on sustainable organization performance: Evidence of community enterprise in Thailand. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100082. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc9020082
53.
SulaimanA. A., IbrahimM. D., & HafeezM. H. (2023). Innovation capabilities in social enterprises: A systematic review. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2023.2184789
54.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
TraceyP., & StottN. (2017). Social innovation: A window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating. Innovation, 19(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924
57.
TrigueroA., Moreno-MondéjarL., & DaviaM. A. (2018). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
58.
UllahR., RahmanM. U., & RazaH. (2021). The impact of green innovation on environmental and organizational performance: A moderated mediation model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1960–1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2734
59.
WangS., WangH., WangJ., & LiJ. (2019). Can social capital improve the innovation performance of environmental startups?Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.037
60.
WestJ., & BogersM. (2017). Open innovation: Current status and research opportunities. Innovation, 19(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995
61.
YaoS., WangY., & ZhengR. (2019). The role of green innovation in environmental performance. Sustainability, 11(6), 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061517
62.
YousafZ., AltafM., & IkramM. (2024). Linking green innovation to sustainable business performance: The mediating role of green dynamic capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 429, 139157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139157
63.
ZulkiffliN. A., NoorN. A. M., & RahmanR. A. (2022). The impact of eco-innovation on SMEs’ sustainable performance: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010445
