This study investigates the digital transformation of news production in the UAE, focusing on how newspapers utilize digital tools for multimedia storytelling, content optimization, and platformization. Using Chadwick’s Hybrid Media System framework, it explores the interplay between traditional and digital media logics in the UAE’s evolving news ecosystem. Through a mixed-method approach—content analysis of 525 online articles and 4,517 social media posts, along with interviews of 15 journalists—the study finds that UAE newspapers have adopted some digital tools but remain largely tied to print-based practices. Multimedia formats and innovative storytelling are limited, hindered by institutional barriers like inadequate training and traditional norms prioritizing content dissemination over engagement. The UAE media landscape exhibits a “diluted” hybridity, where digital and print practices coexist without deep integration. While progress is evident, greater commitment to digital innovation is needed for a full transformation in UAE journalism.
AyishM. (2021). United Arab Emirates: Media for sustainable development. In RichterC.KozmanC. (Eds.), Arab media systems (pp. 110–125). Open Book Publishers.
2.
AyyadK.Ben MoussaM.ZaidB. (2023). Journalists’ perception of the adoption of new communication technologies in the UAE’s media organizations. Journalism Practice, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2300277
BellE. J.OwenT.BrownP. D.HaukaC.RashidianN. (2017). The platform press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. Academic Commons, Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8R216ZZ
BeratisD.WrightS. (2022). Election night broadcasts and the hybrid media system: A case study of Australia. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220971570
7.
BergerR. (2013). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
8.
BirknerT.KeuteA.DavydovaA. (2023). The digital turn from a newsroom perspective – How German journalists from different generations reflect on the digitalization of journalism. Journalism, 25(5), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231198699
9.
BlomJ. N.HansenK. R. (2015). Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 87–100.
10.
BroersmaM. J.GrahamT. S. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007–2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481
11.
CarlsonM. (2015). The many boundaries of journalism. In CarlsonM.LewisS. C. (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
CosteraM. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism: From quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies, 21, 2326–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681
14.
DelmastroM.SplendoreS. (2021). Google, Facebook and what else? Measuring the hybridity of Italian journalists by their use of sources. European Journal of Communication, 36(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120940912
DowlingD. O. (2022). Interactive documentary and the reinvention of digital journalism, 2015–2020. Convergence, 28(3), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211059426
17.
EldridgeS.HessK.TandocE. (2021). Digital journalism and the changing newsroom. Routledge.
18.
EvansS. K.PearceK. E.VitakJ.TreemJ. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(1), 35–52.
HallinD. C.MelladoC.ManciniP. (2021). The concept of hybridity in journalism studies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211039704
HermidaA. (2015). Nothing but the truth: Redrafting the journalistic boundary of verification. In CarlsonM.LewisS. C. (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism professionalism, practices and participation (pp. 37–50). Routledge.
JiangS.RafeeqA. (2019). Connecting the classroom with the newsroom in the digital age: An investigation of journalism education in the UAE, UK and USA. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X19863610
27.
JoffeH.YardleyL. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In MarksD. F.YardleyL. (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). Sage.
28.
KhalilJ. F.ZayaniM. (2024). The double bind of digital transformation in the Arab world: Navigating control and agency. In Digital Middle East: State and society in the information age. Oxford University Press.
29.
KoloC. (2019). The strategic challenges of newspaper publishing in an international perspective. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532919866814
30.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2014). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (3rd ed.). Three Rivers Press.
31.
KozmanC.MelladoC. (2024). Mapping journalistic role performance across five Arab countries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241306401
32.
KrsticA. (2024). Digital transformation of journalism and media in Serbia: What has gone wrong?Journalism, 25(5), 1014–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231151798
LeungT. C.StrumpfK. S. (2024). Disentangling demand and supply of media bias: The case of newspaper homepages. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4968469
LindnerA. M.LarsonR. P. (2017). The expansion and contraction of the journalistic field and American online citizen journalism, 2000–2012. Poetics, 64, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2017.08.001
MastJ.CoesemansR.TemmermanM. (2016). Hybridity and the news: Blending genres and interaction patterns in new forms of journalism. Journalism, 18(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657520
40.
McLeodJ. (2011). Qualitative research in journalism: Taking it to the next level. Routledge.
41.
MelladoC.HumanesM. L.SchermanA.OvandoA. (2021). Do digital platforms really make a difference in content? Mapping journalistic role performance in Chilean print and online news. Journalism, 22(2), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918792386
42.
NielsenR. K.GanterS. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20, 1600–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318
43.
OnwuegbuzieA.CollinsK. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638
44.
Palau-SampioD.Sánchez-GarcíaP. (2020). Digital resources in the current journalistic narrative: Uses and limitations of hypertext, multimedia and interactivity. Communication & Society, 33(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.1-16
45.
PetersC.BroersmaM. (2017). Rethinking journalism again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. Routledge.
46.
PleweC.FürsichE. (2018). Are newsgames better journalism?Journalism Studies, 19(16), 2470–2487.
RobinsonS.MetzlerM. (2021). The digital journalism handbook. Wiley.
49.
RughW. (2004). Arab mass media: Newspapers, radio, and television in Arab politics. Praeger Publishers.
50.
SchapalsA. (2018). Innovations in digital journalism. Springer.
51.
StalphF.Borges-ReyE. (2018). Data Journalism Sustainability: An outlook on the future of data-driven reporting. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 1078–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1503060
TahatK.MansooriA.TahatD.HabesM. (2024). Examining opinion journalism in the United Arab Emirates national press: A comparative analysis. Newspaper Research Journal, 45(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329241255159
TandocE. C.Jr.YaoL. J.WuS. (2020). Man vs. machine? The impact of algorithm authorship on news credibility. Digital Journalism, 8(4), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1762102
56.
ToivanenP.NelimarkkaM.ValaskiviK. (2022). Remediation in the hybrid media environment: Understanding countermedia in context. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2127–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821992701
57.
UsherN. (2022). Journalism and the digital world: Disruptions and continuities. Columbia University Press.
van DijckJ.AlinejadD. (2020). Social media and trust in scientific expertise: Debating the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120981057
60.
VizosoA.Vázquez-HerreroJ. (2019). Fact-checking platforms in Spanish. Features, organization and method. Communication & Society, 32(1), 127–142.
61.
VoltmerK.SelvikK.HøigiltJ. (2021). Hybrid media and hybrid politics: Contesting informational uncertainty in Lebanon and Tunisia. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(4), 842–860.
62.
WangH.YinL. (2024). Legitimizing the think-tank turn: The transformation of Chinese media in the digital era. Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241264255
63.
WestlundO.LewisS. C. (2014). The agents of media innovation activities: Actors, actants, and audiences.”Journal of Media Innovations, 1(2), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.5617/jmi.v1i2.856
64.
ZaidB.IbahrineM.FedtkeJ. (2022). The impact of the platformization of Arab news websites on quality journalism. Global Media and Communication, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665221098022
65.
ZelizerB. (2017). What journalism could be. Polity Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
