Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study contributes the first experiment (n = 1,342) comparing audience reception of solidarity reporting to monitorial reporting. Solidarity reporting prioritizes insights of people impacted, while monitorial reporting focuses on officials. We find that covering abortion access protests using a solidarity approach improved news story credibility perceptions for Democrats, while Republicans rated the solidarity and monitorial stories as equally credible. Solidarity reporting may help newsrooms cover contentious issues inclusively, without diminishing audience perceptions of credibility.

Keywords

press and society reporting techniques audience analysis credibility writing readership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alfaro

Wang

A. B.

Bella

(2022, June 24). Pence calls for national abortion ban, as Trump, McConnell, GOP celebrate SCOTUS ending Roe V. Wade. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/24/abortion-supreme-court-trump-pence-republicans-roe/

Appleman

Sundar

S. S.

(2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057.

Barr

(2022, June 24). Violence by extremists could occur “for weeks” in wake of Supreme Court decision: DHS. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/violence-extremists-occur-weeks-wake-supreme-court-decision/story?id=85664462

Benavidez

(2023, December). How social-media rollbacks endanger democracy ahead of the 2024 elections. Free Press. https://www.freepress.net/big-tech-backslide-report

Bennett

W. L.

Gressett

L. A.

Haltom

(1985). Repairing the news: A case study of the news paradigm. Journal of Communication, 35(2), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02233.x

Bennett

W. L.

Lawrence

R. G.

Livingston

(2006). None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x

Bennett

W. L.

Serrin

(2005). The watchdog role. In Overholser

Hall Jamieson

(Eds.), The press (pp. 169–188). Oxford University Press.

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368.

Brenan

(2023, October 19). Media confidence in U.S. matches 2016 record low. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/512861/media-confidence-matches-2016-record-low.aspx

10.

Bridging Divides Initiative. (2022, July). Issue brief: Understanding emerging trends in protests and political violence around abortion and reproductive rights in the United States [White paper]. Princeton University. https://bridgingdivides.princeton.edu/updates/2022/issue-brief-understanding-emerging-trends-protests-and-political-violence-around-abortion

11.

Brown

D. K.

(2021). Police violence and protests: Digital media maintenance of racism, protest, repression, and the status quo. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1897821

12.

Brown

D. K.

Harlow

(2019). Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle. The International Journal of Press/politics, 24(4), 508–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219853517

13.

Carmines

E. G.

Gerrity

J. C.

Wagner

M. W.

(2010). How abortion became a partisan issue: Media coverage of the interest group-political party connection. Politics & Policy, 38(6), 1135–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00272.x

14.

Casler

Bickel

Hackett

(2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009

15.

Chan

Lee

(1984). The journalistic paradigm on civil protest: A case study of Hong Kong. In Arno

Dissanayake

(Eds.), News media in national and international conflict (pp. 193–202). Westview Press.

16.

Christians

C. G.

Glasser

McQuail

Nordenstreng

White

R. A.

(2010). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.

17.

Collier

J. R.

Masullo

G. M.

Duchovnay

(2022). Conservative news audiences: A lack of media trust and how they think journalism can improve. In Gutsche

R. E.

Jr (Ed.), The future of the presidency, journalism and democracy: After Trump (pp. 50–66). Routledge.

18.

Curry

A. L.

Stroud

N. J.

(2021). The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism, 22(4), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919850387

19.

Detenber

B. H.

Gotlieb

M. R.

McLeod

D. M.

Malinkina

(2007). Frame intensity effects of television news stories about a high-visibility protest issue. Mass Communication & Society, 10(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701580631

20.

Diel

Roberts

(2021). News story aggregation and perceived credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 42(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329211013488

21.

Doherty

Gómez

(2022, May 12). By a wide margin, Americans view inflation as the top problem facing the country today. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/05/12/by-a-wide-margin-americans-view-inflation-as-the-top-problem-facing-the-country-today/

22.

Donohue

G. A.

Tichenor

P. J.

Olien

C. N.

(2000). Guard dog perspective on the role of the media. In Scammell

Semetko

(Eds.), The media, journalism, and democracy (pp. 21–38). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

23.

Douglas

B. D.

Ewell

P. J.

Brauer

(2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLOS ONE, 18(3), Article e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720

24.

Gallup. (2023, July 7). Where do Americans stand on abortion. https://news.gallup.com/poll/321143/americans-stand-abortion.aspx

25.

Gallup, & Knight Foundation. (2023). American views 2022: Part 2 trust, media and democracy. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/American-Views-2022-Pt-2-Trust-Media-and-Democracy.pdf

26.

Gitlin

(2003). The whole world is watching. University of California Press. (Original work published 1983)

27.

Gottfried

Liedke

(2021). Partisan divides in media trust widen, driven by a decline among Republicans. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/30/partisan-divides-in-media-trust-widen-driven-by-a-decline-among-republicans/

28.

Hall

(1980). Encoding/decoding. In Hall

Hobson

Lowe

Willis

(Eds.), Culture, media and language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.

29.

Hall

(1994). Reflections upon the encoding/decoding model: An interview with Stuart Hall. In Cruz

Lewis

(Eds.), Reading, viewing, listening (pp. 253–274). Westview.

30.

Hall

Critcher

Jefferson

Clarke

Roberts

(1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. Macmillan.

31.

Halloran

J. D.

Elliott

P. R. C.

Murdock

(1970). Demonstrations and communication: A case study. Penguin.

32.

Harlow

Brown

D. K.

Salaverría

García-Perdomo

(2020). Is the whole world watching? Building a typology of protest coverage on social media from around the world. Journalism Studies, 21(11), 1590–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1776144

33.

Harlow

Johnson

T. J.

(2011). The Arab Spring: Overthrowing the protest paradigm? How The New York Times, Global voices and Twitter covered the Egyptian revolution. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1359–1374.

34.

Holton

A. A.

Chyi

H. I.

(2011). News overload and the overloaded consumer. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(11), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0610

35.

Hunt

M. E.

Jozkowski

K. N.

Cleland

Crawford

B. L.

W.-J.

Warren

Vinti

(2022). Examining the effect of a randomized media intervention on knowledge and support of abortion restrictions: A case study in the South. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(3), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00624-4

36.

Irfan

(2023, October 30). Why more fossil fuel workers aren’t joining the clean energy revolution. Vox. https://www.vox.com/climate/2023/10/30/23938581/ev-uaw-strike-gm-ford-stellantis-clean-energy

37.

Karlsson

Clerwall

(2018). Transparency to the rescue? Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1923–1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492882

38.

Karlsson

Clerwall

Nord

(2017). Do not stand corrected: Transparency and users’ attitudes to inaccurate news and corrections in online journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654680

39.

Klepper

(2023, May 1). Americans fault news media for dividing nation: AP-NORC poll. The Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/poll-misinformation-polarization-coronavirus-media-d56a25fd8dfd9abe1389b56d7e82b873

40.

Leopold

Bell

M. P.

(2017). News media and the racialization of protest: An analysis of Black Lives Matter articles. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 36(8), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-01-2017-0010

41.

Litman

Robinson

Abberbock

(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z

42.

Liu

(2023). Framing Syrian refugees: Examining news framing effects on attitudes toward refugee admissions and anti-immigrant sentiment. Newspaper Research Journal, 44(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329221077251

43.

Masullo

G. M.

Brown

D. K.

Harlow

(2024). Shifting the protest paradigm? Legitimizing and humanizing protest coverage lead to more positive attitudes toward protest, mixed results on news credibility. Journalism, 25(6), 1230–1251. https://doi.org.10.1177/14648849231200135

44.

Masullo

G. M.

Curry

A. L.

Whipple

K. N.

Murray

(2022). The story behind the story: Examining transparency about the journalistic process and news outlet credibility. Journalism Practice, 16(7), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1870529

45.

Masullo

G. M.

Lee

Riedl

M. J.

(2022). Signaling news outlet credibility in a Google search. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(4), 1148–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211047964

46.

Masullo

G. M.

West

Stroud

N. J.

Fazio

L. K.

(2023). Fact-checking approaches in broadcast news. Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/fact-checking-approaches-in-broadcast-news

47.

Masullo

G. M.

Wilhelm

Lee

Gonçalves

Riedl

M. R.

Stroud

N. J.

(2024). Signaling news outlet trust in a Google Knowledge Panel: A conjoint experiment in Brazil, Germany, and the United States. New Media & Society, 26, 5379–5401. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135860

48.

McLeod

D. M.

(2007). News coverage and social protest: How the media’s protest paradigm exacerbates social conflict. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2007(1), 185–194.

49.

Metzger

M. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

(2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012

50.

Mitchell

Staeheli

L. A.

(2005). Permitting protest: Parsing the fine geography of dissent in America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00622.x

51.

Mortensen

Hughes

T. L.

(2018). Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(4), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0

52.

Mourão

R. R.

Brown

D. K.

(2022). Black Lives Matter coverage: How protest news frames and attitudinal change affect social media engagement. Digital Journalism, 10(4), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1931900

53.

Mourão

R. R.

Kilgo

D. K.

Sylvie

(2021). Framing Ferguson: The interplay of advocacy and journalistic frames in local and national newspaper coverage of Michael Brown. Journalism, 22(2), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918778722

54.

Mutz

(2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton University Press.

55.

Newman

Fletcher

Eddy

Robertson

C. T.

Nielsen

R. K.

(2023). Reuters Institute digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023

56.

Northwestern Medill. (2023, November 16). More than half of U.S. counties have no access or very limited access to local news. https://www.medill.northwestern.edu/news/2023/more-than-half-of-us-counties-have-no-access-or-very-limited-access-to-local-news.html#

57.

Ntontis

Hopkins

(2018). Framing a “social problem”: Emotion in anti-abortion activists’ depiction of the abortion debate. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12249

58.

Nyathi

S. S.

Ndhlovu

M. P.

(2021). Zimbabwean news media discourses on the intersection of abortion, religion, health and the law. Media, Culture & Society, 43(8), 1466–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211029885

59.

Oshin

(2022, June 27). Tensions flare at abortion protests with arrests, clashes. The Hill. https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3537830-tensions-erupt-at-abortion-protests-with-arrests-clashes/

60.

Paolacci

Chandler

Ipeirotis

P. G.

(2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002205

61.

Peacock

Masullo

G. M.

Stroud

N. J.

(2022). The effect of news labels on perceived credibility. Journalism, 23(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920971522

62.

Peifer

J. T.

Meisinger

(2021). The value of explaining the process: How journalistic transparency and perceptions of news media importance can (sometimes) foster message credibility and engagement intentions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98, 828–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211012953

63.

Petrocik

J. R.

(2009). Measuring party support: Leaners are not independents. Electoral Studies, 28, 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.022

64.

Purcell

Hilton

McDaid

(2014). The stigmatisation of abortion: A qualitative analysis of print media in Great Britain in 2010. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(9), 1141–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.937463

65.

Richardson

A. V.

(2020). Bearing witness while black: African-Americans, smartphones, and the new protest #Journalism. Oxford University Press.

66.

Rieh

S. Y.

Danielson

D. R.

(2007). Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. In Cronin

(Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 41, pp. 307–364). Information Today.

67.

Schmid

A. T.

Veldhouse

Payam

(2023). A press(ing) issue: Analysing local news coverage of abortion in the US South during the COVID-19 pandemic. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 25(11), 1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2022.2164064

68.

Schmidt

T. R.

(2023). Challenging journalistic objectivity: How journalists of color call for a reckoning. Journalism, 25(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231160997

69.

Sparks

J. F.

Waddell

T. F.

(2024). Easy to read, easy to judge: Assessing readability as a heuristic for credibility in news. Newspaper Research Journal, 45(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329241242819

70.

Sundar

S. S.

(2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In Metzger

M. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

(Eds.), Digital media, youth and credibility (pp. 73–100). MIT Press.

71.

Tandoc

E. C.

Thomas

R. J.

(2017). Readers value objectivity over transparency. Newspaper Research Journal, 38(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532917698446

72.

Tseng

Fogg

B. J.

(1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301402

73.

Turner

(2022, October 8). Women’s march in Seattle ahead of midterms calls for reproductive rights. Seattle Times. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/womens-march-in-seattle-ahead-of-midterms-calls-for-reproductive-rights/

74.

Varma

(2020). Evoking empathy or enacting solidarity with marginalized communities? A case study of journalistic humanizing techniques in the San Francisco homeless project. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1705–1723. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1789495

75.

Varma

(2023a). Moral solidarity as a news value: Rendering marginalized communities and enduring social injustice newsworthy. Journalism, 24(9), 1880–1898. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221094669

76.

Varma

(2023b). Solidarity reporting on marginalization: A grounded alternative to monitorial reporting’s emphasis on officials. Journalism Practice, 19, 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2178026

77.

Varma

Limov

Cabas-Mijares

(2023). “They always get our story wrong”: Addressing social justice activists’ news distrust through solidarity reporting. Media and Communication, 11(4), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7006

78.

Wang

Haigh

(2024). News reading on smartphones: How do mood, modality, interactivity, and news story length influence news engagement. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43, 4192–4207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2306483

79.

Wasserman

Bosch

Chuma

(2018). Communication from above and below: Media, protest and democracy. Politikon, 45(3), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1446482

80.

Wheeless

L. R.

Grotz

(1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x

81.

Wilner

Montiel Valle

D. A.

Masullo

G. M.

(2021). “To me, there’s always a bias”: Understanding the public’s folk theories about journalism. Journalism Studies, 22(14), 1930–1946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1979422

82.

Woodruff

(2019). Coverage of abortion in select U.S. newspapers. Women’s Health Issues, 29(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.08.008

83.

Wright

(2014). Starved for information: The conflict between mobilizing hunger strikes and distracting media frames [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY]. https://surface.syr.edu/thesis/46

“My body,my choice” versus “officials say” Examining the effects of solidarity and monitorial reporting

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References