Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-4
Assessing Readiness of Health Professions Students to Work With Patients Who Use Drugs: Construct Validity of the REDUCE-HARM Addiction Curricula Survey Tool
The REadiness to Discuss Use, Common Effects, and HArm Reduction Measure (REDUCE-HARM) is a new survey instrument with 2 subscales intended to assess attitudes toward substance use and confidence in core addiction topics among health professions students. Previously, we validated its content via a modified Delphi process with interdisciplinary experts across the United States. This study assessed the construct validity and reliability of REDUCE-HARM among students in health professions to be used in developing and evaluating addiction-related curricula.
Methods:
We sent the REDUCE-HARM to early-training nursing, nurse practitioner, pharmacy, and medical students using class-wide email distribution lists at 7 academic medical centers in the United States from December 2021 to October 2022. We evaluated construct validity and reliability for the complete REDUCE-HARM instrument and the attitudes and confidence subscales using psychometric testing. We used t-tests to compare scores between those with and without prior addiction-related experience.
Results:
Of the 288 participants, 26% were nurses, 9.7% were nurse practitioners, 30.2% were pharmacists, and 34.0% were medical; 52.8% had prior addiction-related experiences. Principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a 2-factor structure of the REDUCE-HARM that corresponded with the subscale constructs of attitudes and confidence. Cronbach’s alphas were .912 (95% confidence interval [CI] .896-.925), .798 (95% CI .765-.827), and .938 (95% CI .925-.947) for the complete REDUCE-HARM, attitudes subscale, and confidence subscale, respectively. There were significantly higher mean attitude scores (59.8 vs 57.8; scale: 12-72; P = .021) and mean confidence scores (46.8 vs 37.3; scale: 12-72; P < .001) for students with prior addiction-related experiences compared to students without.
Conclusions:
Our analysis supports the construct validity and reliability of the REDUCE-HARM among early trainee U.S.-based health professions students and the benefit of direct addiction-related experiences. Future research should evaluate responsiveness to addiction-related educational programs and with additional trainee populations.
KrawczykNRiveraBDJentVKeyesKMJonesCMCerdáM.Has the treatment gap for opioid use disorder narrowed in the U.S.?: a yearly assessment from 2010 to 2019. Int J Drug Policy. 2022;110:103786. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103786
3.
MintzCMHartzSMFisherSL, et al. A cascade of care for alcohol use disorder: using 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data to identify gaps in past 12-month care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021;45(6):1276-1286. doi:10.1111/acer.14609
4.
Van BoekelLCBrouwersEPMVan WeeghelJGarretsenHFL.Stigma among health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders and its consequences for healthcare delivery: systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;131(1-3):23-35. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.018
5.
WakemanSEPham-KanterGDonelanK.Attitudes, practices, and preparedness to care for patients with substance use disorder: results from a survey of general internists. Subst Abus. 2016;37(4):635-641. doi:10.1080/08897077.2016.1187240
6.
VolkowND.Stigma and the toll of addiction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1289-1290. doi:10.1056/nejmp1917360
7.
Rife-PenningtonTDingesBVuTTDouglasMPPenningtonDL.The missing dose: integrating harm reduction into pharmacy curriculums. Subst Use Addict J. 2025;2025:29767342251351753. doi:10.1177/29767342251351753
8.
McGintyEEBarryCL.Stigma reduction to combat the addiction crisis – developing an evidence base. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1291-1292. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2000227
9.
TsaiACKiangMVBarnettML, et al. Stigma as a fundamental hindrance to the United States opioid overdose crisis response. PLoS Med. 2019;16(11):1-18. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002969
10.
KellyJFDowSJWesterhoffC.Does our choice of substance-related terms influence perceptions of treatment need? An empirical investigation with two commonly used terms. J Drug Issues. 2010;40(4):805-818. doi:10.1177/002204261004000403
11.
HappellBByrneLPlatania-PhungCHarrisSBradshawJDaviesJ.Lived-experience participation in nurse education: reducing stigma and enhancing popularity. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014;23(5):427-434. doi:10.1111/inm.12077
12.
Al Ma’aniMAQMHamaidehSHHamdan-MansourAM.The effect of a contact-based intervention on attitudes and intended behaviors of nursing students toward people with mental illness: a quasi-experimental study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(6):e954. doi:10.1002/hsr2.954
13.
KnaakSBesharahJBillettMKharpalKPattenS.Measuring the influence of curricular content and personal stories on substance use stigma. J Nurs Educ. 2022;61(5):264-267. doi:10.3928/01484834-20220303-08
BroylesLMConleyJWHardingJDJGordonAJ.A scoping review of interdisciplinary collaboration in addictions education and training (review). J Addict Nurs. 2013;24(1):29-36. doi:10.1097/JAN.0b013e318282751e
17.
DumencoLMonteiroKCollinsS, et al. A qualitative analysis of interprofessional students’ perceptions toward patients with opioid use disorder after a patient panel experience. Subst Abus. 2019;40(2):125-131. doi:10.1080/08897077.2018.1546262
18.
KoyiMBNelliotAMacKinnonD, et al. Change in medical student attitudes toward patients with substance use disorders after course exposure. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(2):283-287. doi:10.1007/s40596-017-0702-8
19.
MuzykASmothersZPWCollinsKMacEachernMWuLT.Pharmacists’ attitudes toward dispensing naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder: a scoping review of the literature. Subst Abus. 2019;40(4):476-483. doi:10.1080/08897077.2019.1616349
20.
MuzykAMullanPAndolsekK, et al. A pilot interprofessional course on substance use disorders to improve students’ empathy and counseling skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(4):7415. doi:10.5688/ajpe7415
TranTBallJBratbergJP, et al. Report of the 2020 Special Committee on Substance Use and Pharmacy Education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(11):8421. doi:10.5688/ajpe8421
23.
ChappelJNVeachTLKrugRS.The substance abuse attitude survey: an instrument for measuring attitudes. J Stud Alcohol. 1985;46(1):48-52. doi:10.15288/jsa.1985.46.48
24.
WatsonHMaclarenWKerrS.Staff attitudes towards working with drug users: development of the Drug Problems Perceptions Questionnaire. Addiction. 2007;102(2):206-215. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01686.x
25.
BrownPCMButtonDABethuneD, et al. Assessing student readiness to work with people who use drugs: development of a multi-disciplinary addiction educational survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(15):3900-3906. doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07494-5
26.
GossNCHaslund-GourleyBMeredithDM, et al. A comparative analysis of online versus in-person opioid overdose awareness and reversal training for first-year medical students. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(13):1962-1971. doi:10.1080/10826084.2021.1958866
27.
SmothersZReynoldsVMcEachernMDerouinALCarterBMMuzykA.Substance use education in schools of nursing: a systematic review of the literature. Nurse Educ. 2018;43(3):136-139. doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000449
28.
TaldoneSLemmonSBiancoS, et al. Opioid use disorder curriculum: preclerkship pharmacology case-based learning session. MedEdPORTAL. 2022;18:11255. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11255
29.
KnektaERunyonCEddyS.One size doesn’t fit all: using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019;18(1):rm1. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
30.
TavakolMDennickR.Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
31.
American Educational Research Association, ed. Report and Recommendations for the Reauthorization of the Institute of Education Sciences. American Educational Research Association; 2014.
32.
BoatengGONeilandsTBFrongilloEAMelgar-QuiñonezHRYoungSL.Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. Accessed November 11, 2022. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
33.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Core Team; 2022. https://www.R-project.org/
34.
BabyakMAGreenSB.Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(6):587-597. doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181de3f8a
35.
JolliffeITCadimaJ.Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374(2065):20150202. doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
SpencerMCurtinSGarnettM.Alcohol-Induced Death Rates in the United States, 2019-2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022. doi:10.15620/cdc:121795
KissellLMColeyKCKhieuASBunkEJHerbertSMCCarrollJC.Podcasts as a method to deliver education on stigma surrounding opioid use disorder. Pharmacy. 2022;10(6):161. doi:10.3390/pharmacy10060161
40.
MuzykAMantriSMitchellPVelkeyJMReisingerDAndolsekK.Transformative learning and critical consciousness: a model for preclerkship medical school substance use disorder education. Acad Psychiatry. 2023;47(2):152-158. doi:10.1007/s40596-022-01737-7
41.
EstavePMJacobsMLRukstalisM, et al. Opioid stewardship training during the transition to residency to prepare medical students to recognize and treat opioid use disorder. Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):1040-1048. doi:10.1080/08897077.2021.1915918
42.
MarshallKFCarneyPABonuckKJRiquelmePRobbinsJ.Preparing fourth year medical students to care for patients with opioid use disorder: how this training affects their intention to seek addiction care opportunities during residency. Med Educ Online. 2023;28(1):2141602. doi:10.1080/10872981.2022.2141602
43.
MokkinkLTerweeCDe VetH.Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: responsiveness, the longitudinal aspect of validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;140:159-162. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.002
44.
RohsFRLangoneCAColemanRK.Response shift bias: a problem in evaluating nutrition training using self-report measures. J Nutr Educ. 2001;33(3):165-170. doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60187-5
45.
GeldhofGJWarnerDAFindersJKThogmartinAAClarkALongwayKA.Revisiting the utility of retrospective pre-post designs: the need for mixed-method pilot data. Eval Program Plann. 2018;70:83-89. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.002
46.
WasonKPotterAAlvesJ, et al. Addiction nursing competencies: a comprehensive toolkit for the addictions nurse. J Nurs Adm. 2021;51(9):424. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001041
47.
DavernM.Nonresponse rates are a problematic indicator of nonresponse bias in survey research. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(3):905-912. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12070
