Numerous frameworks and elements have been proposed on the concept and path of smart city, while discussions on how to practically achieve smart cities are still not systematic enough. Considering as a form of evolving urbanism along with digitalization rather than a specific technical or construction subject, smart city as a practice tends to be disconnected from urban planning. Smart cities are in especial need of planning and design support. Based on insights and evidence from practical projects, we propose basic elements and practical main challenges faced by effective smart city planning and design, regarding the integration of urban planning thinking and methods, the optimal layout of urban digital elements, and the coordination of digital space with the physical and social space of the city. To achieve these, beneficial technical approaches are suggested for practical smart city planning and design at an operational level, including governance scheme, scenario-based design, and utilization of standardization. It is promising to develop new technological paths and methodological systems specific to smart city based on planning and design thinking and approaches.
Abou JaoudeGMummOCarlowVM (2022) An overview of scenario approaches: A guide for urban design and planning. Journal of Planning Literature37(3): 467–487.
2.
AguilarJJerezMRodríguezT (2018) CAMeonto: Context awareness meta ontology modeling. Applied Computing and Informatics14(2): 202–213.
3.
AhmadKMaabrehMGhalyM, et al. (2022) Developing future human-centered smart cities: Critical analysis of smart city security, data management, and ethical challenges. Computer Science Review43(February): 100452.
4.
AlbinoVBerardiUDangelicoRM (2015) Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology22(1): 3–21.
5.
AllamZDhunnyZA (2019) On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities89(June): 80–91.
6.
AllamZNewmanP (2018) Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance. Smart Cities1(1, 1): 4–25.
7.
AnasAArnottRSmallKA (1998) Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature36(3): 1426–1464.
8.
AndreaniSKalchschmidtMPintoR, et al. (2019) Reframing technologically enhanced urban scenarios: A design research model towards human centered smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges142(May): 15–25.
9.
AngelidouM (2014) Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, Current Research on Cities41(July): S3–11.
10.
AngelidouM (2017) The role of smart city characteristics in the plans of fifteen cities. Journal of Urban Technology24(4): 3–28.
11.
Anthony JnrB (2021) Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture – a review and research agenda. Enterprise Information Systems15(3): 299–331.
12.
AnthopoulosLGVakaliA (2012) Urban planning and smart cities: Interrelations and reciprocities. In: The Future Internet: Future Internet Assembly 2012: From Promises to Reality 9. Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 178–189.
13.
ApostolIAntoniadisPBanerjeeT (2013) Cyberspace design: A new challenge for planners. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Urban Design and Planning166(3): 156–163.
14.
AppioFPLimaMParoutisS (2019) Understanding smart cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges142(May): 1–14.
15.
ArditoLFerrarisAPetruzzelliAM, et al. (2019) The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges142(May): 312–321.
16.
Asselt MarjoleinBAvRijkens-KlompN (2002) A Look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change12(3): 167–184.
BattyM (2021) Introduction to urban science. In: ShiWGoodchildMFBattyMKwanM-PZhangA (eds) Urban Informatics. The Urban Book Series. Singapore: Springer, pp. 11–14.
20.
BattyMMarshallS (2012) The origins of complexity theory in cities and planning. In: PortugaliJMeyerHStolkETanE (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview With Implications to Urban Planning and Design. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 21–45.
21.
BengstonDNFletcherJONelsonKC (2004) Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, The Social Aspects of Landscape Change: Protecting Open Space Under the Pressure of Development69(2): 271–286.
22.
BengstonDNKubikGHBishopPC (2012) Strengthening environmental foresight: Potential contributions of futures research. Ecology and Society17(2): 10. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04794-170210.
BharadwajAEl SawyOAPavlouPA, et al. (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly37(2): 471–482. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825919.
25.
BirchJennifer, ed. 2013. From Prehistoric Villages to Cities: Settlement Aggregation and Community Transformation. New York: Routledge.
BukovszkiVApróDKhojaA, et al. (2019) From assessment to implementation: Design considerations for scalable decision-support solutions in sustainable urban development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science290(1): 012112.
28.
CameroAAlbaE (2019) Smart city and information technology: A review. Cities93(October): 84–94.
29.
CampbellS (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association62(3): 296–312.
30.
CaragliuADel BoCF (2019) Smart innovative cities: The impact of smart city policies on urban innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges142(May): 373–383.
31.
CaragliuADel BoCNijkampP (2009) Smart cities in Europe. (Research Memorandum; No. 2009-48).
32.
CassandrasCG (2016) Smart cities as cyber-physical social systems. Engineering2(2): 156–158.
33.
CastellsM (2020) Space of flows, space of places: Materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age. In: The City Reader, 7th ed. London: Routledge, pp. 237–249.
34.
ChenWWangYRenY, et al. (2022) A novel methodology (WM-TCM) for urban health examination: A case study of Wuhan in China. Ecological Indicators136(March): 108602.
35.
ChoenniSBarghMSBuskerT, et al. (2022) Data governance in smart cities: Challenges and solution directions. Journal of Smart Cities and Society1(1): 31–51.
36.
ChourabiHNamTWalkerS, et al. (2012) Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
37.
CohenBAlmirallEChesbroughH (2016) The city as a lab: Open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review59(1): 5–13.
38.
CouclelisH (2021) Conceptualizing the city of the information age. In: ShiWGoodchildMFBattyMKwanM-PZhangA (eds) Urban Informatics. The Urban Book Series. Singapore: Springer, pp. 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8983-6_9.
39.
CoughlanPCoghlanD (2002) Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management22(2): 220–240.
40.
CowleyRCaprottiF (2019) Smart city as anti-planning in the UK. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space37(3): 428–448.
41.
CsukásMSBukovszkiVReithA (2020) Challenges and solutions for organizational design in urban digitalization. European Journal of Sustainable Development9(2, 2): 615–615.
DengTZhangKShenZ-J (2021) A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. Journal of Management Science and Engineering6(2): 125–134.
45.
De NicolaAVillaniML (2021) Smart city ontologies and their applications: A systematic literature review. Sustainability13(10, 10): 5578.
46.
DeziLPisanoPPirontiM, et al. (2018) Unpacking open innovation neighborhoods: Le milieu of the lean smart city. Management Decision56(6): 1247–1270.
47.
EdelenbosJHirzallaFvan ZoonenL, et al. (2018) Governing the complexity of smart data cities: Setting a research agenda. In: Rodríguez BolívarMP (eds) Smart Technologies for Smart Governments: Transparency, Efficiency and Organizational Issues. Public Administration and Information Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 35–54.
48.
EkeDEbohonO (2020) The Role of Data Governance in the Development of Inclusive Smart Cities. In.
49.
EnginZvan DijkJLanT, et al. (2020) Data-driven urban management: Mapping the landscape. Journal of Urban Management9(2): 140–150.
50.
EvansJ (2011) Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36(2): 223–237.
51.
FalcoSdAngelidouMAddieJ-PD (2019) From the ‘smart city’ to the ‘smart metropolis’? Building resilience in the urban periphery. European Urban and Regional Studies26(2): 205–223.
52.
FangYShanZWangW (2021) Modeling and key technologies of a data-driven smart city system. IEEE Access9: 91244–91258.
53.
FatmaDRolfSJudithJ, et al. (2006) The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) and the US Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1107103.
54.
GiffingerRGudrunH (2010) Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?ACE: Architecture, City and Environment4(12): 7–26.
55.
GoKCarrollJTechV (2004) Scenario-based task analysis. In The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human–Computer Interaction, January.
56.
GuoJJuneWLuJ, et al. (2022) From technocentrism to humanism: Progress and prospects of smart city research. Progress in Geography41(3): 488–498.
57.
GursteinMB (2011) Open Data: Empowering the Empowered or Effective Data Use for Everyone? First Monday, January. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3316.
58.
HämäläinenM (2020) A framework for a smart city design: Digital transformation in the Helsinki smart city. Entrepreneurship and the Community: 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23604-5_5.
59.
HandySLBoarnetMGEwingR, et al. (2002) How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, INNOVATIVE APPROACHES UNDERSTANDING AND INFLUENCING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY23(August): 64–73.
60.
HashemIATChangVAnuarNB, et al. (2016) The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management36(5): 748–758.
61.
HessTMattCBenlianA, et al. (2020) Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. In: Strategic Information Management, 5th ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–173.
62.
HollandsRG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up?City12(3): 303–320.
63.
HopkinsJLMcKayJ (2019) Investigating ‘anywhere working’ as a mechanism for alleviating traffic congestion in smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges142(May): 258–272.
64.
HopkinsLD (2012) Plan assessment: Making and using plans well. In: CraneRWeberR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 803.
KandtJBattyM (2021) Smart cities, big data and urban policy: Towards urban analytics for the long run. Cities109(February): 102992.
69.
KaplanJ (2016) Artificial intelligence: Think again. Communications of the ACM60(1): 36–38.
70.
KarvonenACookMHaarstadH (2020) Urban planning and the smart city: Projects, practices and politics. Urban Planning5(1, 1): 65–68.
71.
KeithMO’CleryNParnellS, et al. (2020) The future of the future city? The new urban sciences and a PEAK urban interdisciplinary disposition. Cities105(October): 102820.
72.
KiernanMJ (1983) Ideology, politics, and planning: Reflections on the theory and practice of urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10(1): 71–87.
73.
KillingsworthMAKahnemanDMellersB (2023) Income and emotional well-being: A conflict resolved. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120(10): e2208661120.
74.
KishitaYOhishiYUwasuM, et al. (2016) Evaluating the life cycle CO2 emissions and costs of thermoelectric generators for passenger automobiles: A scenario analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production126(July): 607–619.
75.
KitchinRLauriaultTPMcArdleG (2015) Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science2(1): 6–28.
76.
KomninosN (2002) Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. London: Routledge.
77.
KomninosNKakderiCPanoriA, et al. (2019) Smart city planning from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology26(2): 3–20.
78.
KourtitKNijkampP (2012) Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research25(2): 93–95.
KumarHSinghMKGuptaMP, et al. (2020) Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the smart city transformation framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change153(April): 119281.
LegnerCEymannTHessT, et al. (2017) Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Business & Information Systems Engineering59(4): 301–308.
83.
LehtolaVVKoevaMElberinkSO, et al. (2022) Digital twin of a city: Review of technology serving city needs. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation114(November): 102915.
LimCKimK-JMaglioPP (2018) Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities82(December): 86–99.
86.
LiuLYuE (2004) Designing information systems in social context: A goal and scenario modelling approach. Information Systems, The 14th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE*02), 29(2): 187–203.
87.
LiuZ-gLiX-yZhuX-h (2022) Scenario modeling for government big data governance decision-making: Chinese experience with public safety services. Information & Management59(3): 103622.
88.
LomMPribylO (2021) Smart city model based on systems theory. International Journal of Information Management56(February): 102092.
89.
LuH-PChenC-SYuH (2019) Technology roadmap for building a smart city: An exploring study on methodology. Future Generation Computer Systems97(August): 727–742.
90.
MackayHGillespieG (1992) Extending the social shaping of technology approach: Ideology and appropriation. Social Studies of Science22(4): 685–716.
MattCHessTBenlianA (2015) Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering57(5): 339–343.
93.
MattoniBGugliermettiFBisegnaF (2015) A multilevel method to assess and design the renovation and integration of smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society15(July): 105–119.
94.
McFarlaneCSöderströmO (2017) On alternative smart cities: From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City21(3-4): 312–328.
95.
MeijerA (2016) Smart city governance: A local emergent perspective. In: Gil-GarciaJRPardoTANamT (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda: A Comprehensive View of the 21st Century City. Public Administration and Information Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 73–85.
96.
MeijerABolívarMPR (2016) Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences82(2): 392–408.
97.
MinKYoonMFuruyaK (2019) A comparison of a smart city’s trends in urban planning before and after 2016 through keyword network analysis. Sustainability11(11, 11): 3155.
98.
MoraLBoliciRDeakinM (2017) The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Urban Technology24(1): 3–27.
99.
MoraLDeakinMReidA, et al. (2019) How to overcome the dichotomous nature of smart city research: Proposed methodology and results of a pilot study. Journal of Urban Technology26(2): 89–128.
100.
MorakanyaneRGraceAO’ReillyP (2017) Conceptualizing digital transformation in business organizations: A systematic review of literature. In: Digital Transformation – From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives. Bled, Slovenia: University of Maribor Press, pp. 427–443.
101.
MoustakaVVakaliAAnthopoulosLG (2018) A systematic review for smart city data analytics. ACM Computing Surveys51(5): 103:1–10341.
102.
NeirottiPMarcoADCaglianoAC, et al. (2014) Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities38(June): 25–36.
103.
NelDdu PlessisCLandmanK (2018) Planning for dynamic cities: Introducing a framework to understand urban change from a Complex adaptive systems approach. International Planning Studies23(3): 250–263.
104.
NicolasCKimJChiS (2021) Natural language processing-based characterization of top-down communication in smart cities for enhancing citizen alignment. Sustainable Cities and Society66(March): 102674.
105.
OosthuizenMJH (2002) Chapter 9—Action research”. from “Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals (Second Edition). Kirsty Williamson, Amanda Bow, Frada Burstein, Peta Darke, Ross Harvey, Graeme Johanson, Sue McKemmish, etc. Topics in Australasian Library and Information Studies. Chandos Publishing, pp. 159–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-876938-42-0.50017-4.
106.
OthmanSHBeydounG (2013) Model-driven disaster management. Information & Management50(5): 218–228.
107.
PanGQiGZhangW, et al. (2013) Trace analysis and mining for smart cities: Issues, methods, and applications. IEEE Communications Magazine51(6): 120–126.
108.
ParkinP (2009) Managing Change in Healthcare: Using Action Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
PottsC (1995) Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques (DIS’95). Ann Arbor, MI: ACM Press, pp. 247–256.
111.
PourzolfagharZBastidasVHelfertM (2020) Standardisation of enterprise architecture development for smart cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy11(4): 1336–1357.
112.
PrigogineIStengersIPagelsHR (1985) Order out of chaos. Physics Today38(January): 97.
113.
RachmawatiR (2019) ICT-based innovation in the smart city masterplan and its relation to regional planning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science328(1): 012026.
114.
ReedMS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation141(10): 2417–2431.
115.
RuhlandtRWS (2018) The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities81(November): 1–23.
116.
Saad-SulonenJCHorelliL (2010) The value of community informatics to participatory urban planning and design: A case-study in Helsinki. The Journal of Community Informatics6(2). https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v6i2.2555.
117.
SchleicherJMVöglerMInzingerC, et al. (2016) A holistic, interdisciplinary decision support system for sustainable smart city design. In: Smart Cities. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–10.
118.
ScottAJ (2008) Inside the city: On urbanisation, public policy and planning. Urban Studies45(4): 755–772.
119.
SecinaroSBresciaVCalandraD, et al. (2021) Towards a hybrid model for the management of smart city initiatives. Cities116(September): 103278.
120.
SharifRAPokharelS (2022) Smart city dimensions and associated risks: Review of literature. Sustainable Cities and Society77(February): 103542.
121.
ShiWGoodchildMBattyM, et al. (2022) Prospective for urban informatics. Urban Informatics1(1): 2.
122.
ShiodeN (2000) Urban planning, information technology, and cyberspace. Journal of Urban Technology7(2): 105–126.
SingletonADSpielmanSE (2021) Urban governance. In: ShiWGoodchildMFBattyMKwanM-PZhangA (eds) Urban Informatics. The Urban Book Series. Singapore: Springer, pp. 229–241.
127.
SørensenETorfingJ (2018) Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in urban spaces. Urban Affairs Review54(2): 388–418.
128.
SteadDVaddadiB (2019) Automated vehicles and how they may affect urban form: A review of recent scenario studies. Cities92(September): 125–133.
129.
SuKLiJFuH (2011) Smart city and the applications. In 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC): 1028–1031. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECC.2011.6066743.
130.
TaylorJEBennettGMohammadiN (2021) Engineering smarter cities with smart city digital twins. Journal of Management in Engineering37(6): 02021001.
131.
TeismanGVan BuurenAGerritsL (2009) Managing Complex Governance Systems: Dynamics, Self-Organization and Coevolution in Public Investments. New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).
YigitcanlarTKamruzzamanMBuysL, et al. (2018) Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities81(November): 145–160.
138.
ZhangKNiJYangK, et al. (2017) Security and privacy in smart city applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Communications Magazine55(1): 122–129.
139.
ZhangXQ (2016) The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world. Habitat International, Housing the Planet: Evolution of Global Housing Policies54(May): 241–252.
140.
ZhengCYuanJZhuL, et al. (2020) From digital to sustainable: A scientometric review of smart city literature between 1990 and 2019. Journal of Cleaner Production258(June): 120689.
141.
Zhong-JunLGuan-YuLYingP (2016) A method of meta-context ontology modeling and uncertainty reasoning in SWoT. 2016 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC): 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberC.2016.34.
142.
ZygiarisS (2013) Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy4(2): 217–231.
