The current eco-social crisis is driven by an unsustainable socioeconomic model based on continued economic growth that exceeds planetary limits. Groups experiencing disadvantages are being disproportionately affected, further deepening global, regional, and local health inequities. Understanding the simultaneous ecological and social crises through a comprehensive approach across disciplines and sectors—including citizen participation—is essential for driving transformative change and paradigm shifts. Achieving genuine ecological sustainability, social justice, and health equity is critical for transitioning towards a new social-ecological paradigm in research and policy. This requires transformative research and policymaking in key areas—eco-social crisis; democracy, social inclusion and participation; geopolitics; and equitable, sustainable cities—all of which represent pressing challenges within this global crisis, and serve as thematic axes for the European conference Rethinking the Eco-Social Determinants of Health Inequities through the Transdisciplinary and Intersectoral Lens (ESDHI-EU), which will be held in Barcelona, Spain, on May 22–23, 2025, and will explore the root causes of health inequities from a transdisciplinary, intersectoral, and transnational perspective.
RomanelloMWalawenderMHsuSC, et al.The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: facing record-breaking threats from delayed action. Lancet. 2024;404(10465):1847-1896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01822-1
WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: Commission on Social Determinants of Health Final Report. World Health Organization; 2008.
4.
SolarOIrwinA. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. WHO Document Production Services; 2010.
McCartneyGDickieEEscobarOCollinsC. Health inequalities, fundamental causes and power: Towards the practice of good theory. Sociol Health Illn. 2021;43(1):20–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13181
7.
ChelakKChakoleS. The role of social determinants of health in promoting health equality: A narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33425. doi:https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33425
8.
GramsciA. Selections from the prison notebooks. In: The Applied Theatre Reader. Routledge; 2020:141–142.
9.
Thimm-KaiserMBenzekriAGuilamo-RamosV. Conceptualizing the mechanisms of social determinants of health: A heuristic framework to inform future directions for mitigation. Milbank Q. 2023;101(2):486–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12642
10.
Cash-GibsonLHarrisMGuerraGBenachJ. A novel conceptual model and heuristic tool to strengthen understanding and capacities for health inequalities research. Health Res POLICY Syst. 2020;18(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00559-z
11.
MerzSJaehnPMenaE, et al.Intersectionality and eco-social theory: A review of potentials for public health knowledge and social justice. Crit Public Health. 2023;33(2):125–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2021.1951668
12.
GuptaJBaiXLivermanDM, et al.A just world on a safe planet: A Lancet Planetary Health–Earth Commission report on Earth-system boundaries, translations, and transformations. Lancet Planet Health. 2024;8(10):e813–e873. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00042-1
13.
Amorim-MaiaATAnguelovskiIChuEConnollyJ. Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Clim. 2022;41:101053. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
14.
HankivskyO. Rethinking care ethics: On the promise and potential of an intersectional analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2014;108(2):252–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000094
15.
MondalSVan BelleSMaioniA. Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: A meta-narrative review. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(4):552–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa163
16.
MâsseLCMoserRPStokolsD, et al.Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S151–S160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020
17.
ScholzRWSteinerG. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: Part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?Sustain Sci. 2015;10(4):653–671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0327-3
18.
ArnoldM. Transdisciplinary research (transdisciplinarity). In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer; 2020:2332–2340.
19.
KleinJT. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. Oxf Handb Interdiscip. 2010;15(6):15.
20.
Horcea-MilcuAILeventonJLangDJ. Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. Environ Sci Policy. 2022;136:187–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019
21.
PicardMSabistonCMMcNamaraJK. The need for a transdisciplinary, global health framework. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(2):179–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0149
22.
LangDJWiekABergmannM, et al.Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci. 2012;7(S1):25–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
23.
RigolotC. Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: Complementarities and creative tensions. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7(1):100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00598-5
24.
WardaniJBosJJ(Annette)Ramirez-LoveringDCaponAG. Towards a practice framework for transdisciplinary collaboration in planetary health. Glob Sustain. 2024;7:e16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.6
25.
AlderwickHHutchingsABriggsAMaysN. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: A systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1
26.
ToweVLLevitonLChandraASloanJCTaitMOrleansT. Cross-Sector collaborations and partnerships: Essential ingredients to help shape health and well-being. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(11):1964–1969. doi:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0604
World Health Organization. Health in All Policies: Training Manual; 2015. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/151788/9789241507981_eng.pdf?sequence=1.
31.
TrowbridgeJTanJYHussainSOsmanAEBDi RuggieroE. Examining intersectoral action as an approach to implementing multistakeholder collaborations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Int J Public Health. 2022;67:1604351. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604351
WrongDH. Problems in defining power. In: Power. Routledge; 1995:1-20.
34.
KuruvillaSHintonRBoermaT, et al.Business not as usual: How multisectoral collaboration can promote transformative change for health and sustainable development. Br Med J.2018;363:k4771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4771
35.
WHO Regional Office for Europe. Driving Transformative Action: From Ostrava to Budapest and beyond with National Portfolios of Actions on Environment and Health: Policy Brief; 2023. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/368159/WHO-EURO-2023-7587-47354-69516-eng.pdf?sequence=3.
36.
World Health Organization. Promoting Environment and Health Policies at Local Level: A Policy Brief for Decision-Makers and Practitioners; 2023. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/369596/WHO-EURO-2023-7676-47443-69727-eng.pdf?sequence=3.
37.
PhamLTKumarPDahanaWDNguyenDH. Promoting global health transdisciplinary research for planetary health: Towards achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. J Glob Health. 2023;13:03007. doi:https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.03007
38.
GoughI. Two scenarios for sustainable welfare: A framework for an eco-social contract. Soc Policy Soc. 2022;21(3):460–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000701
39.
CollinsPH. The difference that power makes: Intersectionality and participatory democracy. Investig Fem. 2017;8(1):19–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54888
40.
WilsonMGNidumoluABerditchevskaiaIGauvinFPAbelsonJLavisJN. Identifying approaches for synthesizing and summarizing information to support informed citizen deliberations in health policy: A scoping review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020;25(1):59–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819619872221
41.
World Health Organization. Evidence, Policy, Impact: WHO Guide for Evidence-Informed Decision-Making; 2021. Accessed February 20, 2024. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/350994/9789240039872-eng.pdf?sequence=1.
42.
HickelJ. Reimagining the Human-Environment Relationship. United Nations University, the UN Environment Programme; 2022.
43.
DalyH. Growthism: Its ecological, economic and ethical limits. Real-World Econ Rev. 2019;87:9–22.
44.
RaworthK. Why it’s time for Doughnut Economics. IPPR Progress Rev. 2017;24(3):216–222.
45.
HickelJO’NeillDWFanningALZoomkawalaH. National responsibility for ecological breakdown: A fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970–2017. Lancet Planet Health. 2022;6(4):e342–e349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00044-4
DeivanayagamTASelvarajahSHickelJ, et al.Climate change, health, and discrimination: Action towards racial justice. Lancet.2023;401(10370):5–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02182-1
48.
RomanelloMMcGushinADi NapoliC, et al.The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Code red for a healthy future. Lancet.2021;398(10311):1619–1662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6
49.
DobsonARoweZBergerJWholeyPCaroT. Biodiversity loss due to more than climate change. Science. 2021;374(6568):699–700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm6216
50.
Millward-HopkinsJSteinbergerJKRaoNDOswaldY. Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. Glob Environ Change. 2020;65:102168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168
WillettWRockströmJLokenB, et al.Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet.2019;393(10170):447–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
53.
HammerA. Comparative capitalism and emerging economies: Formal-informal economy interlockages and implications for institutional analysis. Rev Int Polit Econ. 2019;26(2):337–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1554537
54.
RockströmJSteffenWNooneK, et al.Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(2):art32. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
55.
RichardsonKSteffenWLuchtW, et al.Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci Adv. 2023;9(37):eadh2458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
KallisGHickelJO’NeillDW, et al.Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. Lancet Planet Health. 2025;9(1):e62–e78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3
RohrJRBarrettCBCivitelloDJ, et al.Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to global food production. Nat Sustain. 2019;2(6):445–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0293-3
61.
AraújoRGChavez-SantoscoyRAParra-SaldívarRMelchor-MartínezEMIqbalHMN. Agro-food systems and environment: Sustaining the unsustainable. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2023;31:100413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100413
SwinburnBAKraakVIAllenderS, et al.The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. Lancet.2019;393(10173):791–846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8
64.
KikstraJSMastrucciAMinJRiahiKRaoND. Decent living gaps and energy needs around the world. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(9):095006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c27
65.
BüchsMCassNMullenCLucasKIvanovaD. Emissions savings from equitable energy demand reduction. Nat Energy. 2023;8(7):758–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01283-y
BroadbentPThomsonRKopaskerD, et al.The public health implications of the cost-of-living crisis: outlining mechanisms and modelling consequences. Lancet Reg Health – Eur. 2023;27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585
McDaidDParkAL. Evidence on Financing and Budgeting Mechanisms to Support Intersectoral Actions between Health, Education, Social Welfare and Labour Sectors. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016.
MarmotM, World Health Organization, UCL Institute of Health Equity, eds. Review of Social Determinants and the Health Divide in the WHO European Region: Final Report. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2014.
73.
Pan American Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization, Commission of the Pan American Health Organization on Equity and Health Inequalities in the Americas. Just Societies: Health Equity and Dignified Lives. Report of the Commission of the Pan American Health Organization on Equity and Health Inequalities in the Americas. Commission of the Pan American Health Organization on Equity and Health Inequalities in the Americas, ed. Published online 2019. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51571.
BenachJVivesAAmableMVanroelenCTarafaGMuntanerC. Precarious employment: Understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(2014):229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500
78.
VivesAAmableMFerrerM, et al.The Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES): Psychometric properties of a new tool for epidemiological studies among waged and salaried workers. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(8):548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.048967
79.
BenachJVivesATarafaGDelclosCMuntanerC. What should we know about precarious employment and health in 2025? Framing the agenda for the next decade of research. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(1):232–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv342
80.
FonteneauBNeamtanNWanyamaFMoraisLPde PoorterM. In support of the First edition of the Social and Solidarity Economy Academy, 25 −29th October 2010, ITC ILO, Turin, Italy.
AbubakarIAldridgeRWDevakumarD, et al.The UCL–Lancet Commission on Migration and Health: The health of a world on the move. Lancet.2018;392(10164):2606–2654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32114-7
83.
NewmanJMukherjeeAHooleC. Constraints and enablers of regional environmental policy: Governance challenges in England and Wales. J Environ Policy Plan. 2024;26(1):1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2023.2297793
84.
SchlembachR. Undercover policing and the spectre of ‘domestic extremism’: The covert surveillance of environmental activism in Britain. Soc Mov Stud. 2018;17(5):491–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934
85.
VisserBPaliB. We feel that warm breath in our necks’: Experiences and impacts of criminalisation of environmental activism in Belgium. Justice, Power and Resistance. 2024;8(1):5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/26352338Y2024D000000030
86.
BirssM. Criminalizing Environmental Activism: As threats to the environment increase across Latin America, new laws and police practices take aim against the front line activists defending their land and resources. NACLA Rep Am. 2017;49(3):315–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2017.1373958
87.
BaroniAd’HaenensLLoWHTrappelJTomazT. Protecting journalists from harassment: Comparing existing protection mechanisms and the effects on democracy. Published online 2022. Accessed February 13, 2025. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/672904.
MorrisonJMalikSMMR. Population health trends and disease profile in Somalia 1990–2019, and projection to 2030: Will the country achieve sustainable development goals 2 and 3?BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14960-6
91.
Calderón-VillarrealATerryBFriedmanJ, et al.Deported, homeless, and into the canal: Environmental structural violence in the binational Tijuana River. Soc Sci Med. 2022;305:115044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115044
Gomez-VidalCGomezAM. Invisible and unequal: Unincorporated community status as a structural determinant of health. Soc Sci Med. 2021;285:114292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114292
BorderonMBestKBBaileyKHoppingDLDoveMCervantes de BloisCL. The risks of invisibilization of populations and places in environment-migration research. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021;8(1):314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00999-0
96.
MatsaW. Marginality, Migration and Education: Educational Experiences of Migrants’ Children in Zimbabwe. Springer Nature; 2020.
97.
ShekhawatSDel ReEC. Women and Borders: Refugees, Migrants and Communities. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2017.
98.
Planas GifraL. Securitizing migration in times of crisis: Private actors and the provision of (in)security. Cogent Soc Sci. 2024;10(1):2296601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2296601
99.
Mosler VidalEPrabash WickramageK. Tracking migration and health inequities. Bull World Health Organ. 2024;102(02):143–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290776
100.
BelloV. The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU: From the management of a ‘crisis’ to a governance of human mobility?J Ethn Migr Stud. 2022;48(6):1327–1344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851464
101.
PersaudABhugraDValsrajKBhavsarV. Understanding geopolitical determinants of health. Bull World Health Organ. 2021;99(2):166–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.254904
MakkiMButtFAAkashSAPetrovaKNaeemSA. Fragile geographies and the climate-conflict nexus: Investigating climate-induced security risks, migration, and inequality in Balochistan, Pakistan. Alternatives. 2024;50(2):350-375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754241291728
104.
HujoKCarterM. Crises of Inequality: Shifting Power for a New Eco-Social Contract. UNRISD; 2022.
105.
SenguptaABodiniCFrancoS. Struggles for health: An emancipatory approach in the era of neoliberal globalization. Development. 2018;61(1):101–107.
106.
FootRMacFarlaneSNMastandunoM. US Hegemony and International Organizations: The United States and Multilateral Institutions. OUP Oxford; 2003.
107.
WilliamsonJ. Democracy and the “Washington consensus”. World Dev. 1993;21(8):1329–1336.
108.
WilliamsonJ. A short history of the Washington Consensus. Law Bus Rev Am. 2009;15:7.
109.
ManzettiL. The politics of privatization and deregulation in Latin America. Q Rev Econ Finance. 1994;34:43–76.
110.
AhumadaJMAhumadaJM. 2019. Latin America since the 1990s: Deindustrialization, reprimarization and policy space restrictions. Chapter in The Political Economy of Peripheral Growth. Chile in the Global Economy. Published online 49–72.
111.
BustosBMauroSEDGarcía-LópezGMilanezFOjedaD, eds. Routledge Handbook of Latin America and the Environment. Routledge; 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429344428
112.
GomesMBöhmS. 245Right-wing populism vs. climate capitalism: climate change governance under scrutiny. In: FeldmannMMorganG, eds. Business and Populism: The Odd Couple?Oxford University Press; 2023:245–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894335.003.0012
113.
MeroneLAshtonS. The inextricable link between public health and human rights and threats to progression in far-right populism and neoliberal systems. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021;45(5):417–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13140
BrockASovacoolBKHookA. Volatile photovoltaics: Green industrialization, sacrifice zones, and the political ecology of solar energy in Germany. Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2021:1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1856638
116.
BaileyDTurnerJ. The Anthropocene as framed by the far right. IPPR Progress Rev. 2023;30(1):28–32.
117.
AronczykM. Branding the nation in the era of climate crisis: Eco-nationalism and the promotion of green national sovereignty. Nations Natl. 2024;30(1):25–38.
118.
BettiniGCasagliaA. From denial to domestication: Unpacking Italy’s right-wing approach to climate migration and security. Geoforum. 2024;155:104079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104079
119.
Rodriguez FernandezGV. Reproduciendo Otros Mundos: Indigenous Women’s Struggles against Neo-Extractivism and the Bolivian State. Ph.D. Portland State University; 2019. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/em-reproduciendo-otros-mundos-indigenous-women-s/docview/2299817543/se-2?accountid=14708.
120.
Noting More than 45,000 Palestinians Have Been Killed in Gaza, Assistant Secretary-General Tells Security Council ‘Ceasefire Is Long Overdue’ | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. Accessed April 3, 2025. https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15944.doc.htm.
121.
DaviesSEngströmGPetterssonTÖbergM. Organized violence 1989–2023, and the prevalence of organized crime groups. J Peace Res. 2024;61(4):673–693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433241262912
122.
World Urbanization Prospects The 2018 Revision.
123.
WhitmeeSHainesABeyrerC, et al.Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet.2015;386(10007):1973–2028. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1
ColeHVSTriguero-MasMConnollyJJTAnguelovskiI. Determining the health benefits of green space: Does gentrification matter?Health Place. 2019;57:1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.001
126.
Giles-CortiBMoudonAVLoweM, et al.What next? Expanding our view of city planning and global health, and implementing and monitoring evidence-informed policy. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(6):e919–e926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00066-3
127.
AnguelovskiIColeHConnollyJTriguero-MasM. Do green neighbourhoods promote urban health justice?Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(6):e270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30096-3
128.
AnguelovskiIConnollyJJTMasipLPearsallH. Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: A longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geogr. 2018;39(3):458–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987
129.
AnguelovskiIConnollyJJTColeH, et al.Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3816. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1
130.
PineoH. Healthy Urbanism: Designing and Planning Equitable, Sustainable and Inclusive Places. Palgrave Macmillan; 2022.
BentleyRBakerEAitkenZ. The ‘double precarity’ of employment insecurity and unaffordable housing and its impact on mental health. Soc Sci Med. 2019;225:9–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.008
134.
United Nations. General Assembly. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Vol 3381. Department of State, United States of America; 1949.
135.
RobinsonTRobertsonNCurtisFDarkoNJonesCR. Examining psychosocial and economic barriers to green space access for racialised individuals and families: A narrative literature review of the evidence to date. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;20(1):745.
136.
AlexiouAMasonKFahyKTaylor-RobinsonDBarrB. Assessing the impact of funding cuts to local housing services on drug and alcohol related mortality: A longitudinal study using area-level data in England. Int J Hous Policy. 2023;23(2):362–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2021.2002660
137.
BakerEBentleyRMasonK. The mental health effects of housing tenure: Causal or compositional?Urban Stud. 2013;50(2):426–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012446992
138.
Bolívar MuñozJBernal SolanoMMateo RodríguezI, et al.La salud de las personas adultas afectadas por un proceso de desahucio. Gac Sanit. 2016;30(1):4–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.10.002
139.
ClasenTSmithKR. Let the “A” in WASH stand for air: Integrating research and interventions to improve household air pollution (HAP) and water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) in low-income settings. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(2):025001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4752
140.
Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (Ipcc), ed. Urban systems and other settlements. In: Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 2023:861–952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.010
141.
WeimannAOniT. A systematised review of the health impact of urban informal settlements and implications for upgrading interventions in South Africa, a rapidly urbanising middle-income country. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3608.
142.
SatterthwaiteDArcherDColenbranderS, et al.Building resilience to climate change in informal settlements. One Earth. 2020;2(2):143–156.
143.
GilmoreABFabbriABaumF, et al.Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health. Lancet.2023;401(10383):1194–1213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00013-2
144.
FrielSCollinJDaubeM, et al.Commercial determinants of health: Future directions. Lancet.2023;401(10383):1229–1240.
145.
KickbuschIAllenLFranzC. The commercial determinants of health. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(12):e895–e896.
146.
GhebreyesusTA. Achieving health for all requires action on the economic and commercial determinants of health. Lancet.2023;401(10383):1137–1139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00574-3
147.
Sánchez-CorcueraRNuñez-MarcosASesma-SolanceJ, et al.Smart cities survey: Technologies, application domains and challenges for the cities of the future. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2019;15(6):155014771985398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719853984
148.
DengTZhangKShenZJ. A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. J Manag Sci Eng. 2021;6(2):125–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003
ButtazzoniAVeenhofMMinakerL. Smart city and high-tech urban interventions targeting human health: An equity-focused systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2325.
MoutonMDuceyAGreenJ, et al.Towards ‘smart cities’ as ‘healthy cities’: Health equity in a digital age. Can J Public Health. 2019;110(3):331–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-019-00177-5
