Unemployment and inequality are growing concerns that disproportionately affect people with disabilities. We compared unemployment rates and barriers to labor market participation for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) as an exemplary case of disability with different socioeconomic positions and from a cross-national perspective across 20 countries worldwide. We showed that persons with SCI have much higher unemployment rates than the general population. While this situation is many times worse for those in low-income groups, persons with SCI in high-income groups are often in a position comparable to the general population. The main barriers to entering the labor market are health status, the impossibility of finding suitable jobs, and the lack of information about employment opportunities. This is the first study that quantifies the extent of inequality in the labor market for persons with SCI. Across the 20 countries analyzed, facing disability has a much higher impact on those in low-income groups. This reality is explained by the fact that people in lower-income groups face many more barriers to entering the labor market than those in higher-income groups.
JonesMKMcVicarD. Estimating the impact of disability onset on employment. Soc Sci Med.2020;255:113001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113001. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PMID: 32334287.
2.
World Health Organization. WHO global disability action plant 2014-2021: better health for all people with disability. 2015 Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/199544.
3.
GaoQPrinaAMMaYAceitunoDMaystonR. Inequalities in older age and primary health care utilization in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services. 2022;52(1):99-114.
4.
LidalIBHuynhTKBiering-SørensenF. Return to work following spinal cord injury: A review. Disabil Rehabil.2007;29(17):1341-1375.
5.
ShieldsMSpittalMJAitkenZDimovSKavanaghAKingTL. Does employment status mediate the association between disability status and mental health among young adults? Evidence from the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey. Occup Environ Med.2023;80(9):498-505.
6.
de BoerAGGeuskensGABültmannU, et al.Employment status transitions in employees with and without chronic disease in The Netherlands. Int J Public Health.2018;63(6):713-722.
7.
DobsonKGMustardCCarnideNFurlanASmithPM. Impact of persistent pain symptoms on work absence, health status and employment 18 months following disabling work-related injury or illness. Occup Environ Med.2022;79(10):697-705.
8.
BurströmBWhiteheadMLindholmCDiderichsenF. Inequality in the social consequences of illness: How well do people with long-term illness fare in the British and Swedish labor markets?International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services. 2000;30(3):435-451.
9.
World Health Organization, International Spinal Cord Society. International perspectives on spinal cord injury2013. xiii, 231 pages p.
10.
ChamberlainJDMeierSMaderLvon GrootePMBrinkhofMW. Mortality and longevity after a spinal cord injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44(3):182-198.
11.
FeketeCBrachMEhrmannCPostMWStuckiG. Cohort profile of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey implemented in 22 countries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2020;101(12):2103-2111. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.022. Epub 2020 Jun 10. PMID: 32533933.
12.
PostMWReinhardtJDAvellanetM, et al.Employment among people with spinal cord injury in 22 countries across the world: Results from the international spinal cord injury community survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2020;101(12):2157-2166.
13.
BrinkhofMWAl-KhodairyAEriks-HooglandI, et al.Health conditions in people with spinal cord injury: Contemporary evidence from a population-based community survey in Switzerland. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(2):197-209.
14.
CastleR. An investigation into the employment and occupation of patients with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1994;32(3):182-187.
15.
EscorpizoRMillerWCTrenamanLM, et al.Work and employment following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. 2014;(Version 6.0):1-35.
16.
ThollADLimaTCNogueiraSP, et al.Labour market participation among rehabilitated individuals with spinal cord injury in Brazil: A cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord2023;61:119-124.
17.
HalvorsenASteinsbekkALeiulfsrudASPostMWBiering-SørensenFPapeK. Labour market participation after spinal cord injury. A register-based cohort study. Spinal Cord2023;61(4):244-252.
18.
MartiAEscorpizoRSchweglerUStaubliSTrezziniB. Employment pathways of individuals with spinal cord injury living in Switzerland: A qualitative study. Work. 2017;58(2):99-110.
19.
SchweglerUFeketeCFingerMKarczKStaubliSBrinkhofMW. Labor market participation of individuals with spinal cord injury living in Switzerland: Determinants of between-person differences and counterfactual evaluation of their instrumental value for policy. Spinal Cord. 2021;59(4):429-440.
20.
MonsonRR. Observations on the healthy worker effect. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1986;28(6):425-433.
21.
MeadeMReedKSaundersLKrauseJ. It’s all of the above: Benefits of working for individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil.2015;21(1):1-9.
22.
KrauseJSSaundersLLAcunaJ. Gainful employment and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: Effects beyond that of demographic, injury and socioeconomic factors. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(10):784-788.
23.
ZhaoHZhangYWangWColeS. Contribution of travel participation to social integration and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Disabil Health J.2021;14(4):101167.
24.
Gross-HemmiMHPostMWEhrmannC, et al.Study protocol of the international spinal cord injury (InSCI) community survey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S23-S34.
25.
StuckiGBickenbachJ. The international spinal cord injury survey and the learning health system for spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.2017;96(2):S2-S4.
26.
Working age population (indicator) [Internet]. 2022).
27.
OnaAStrømVLeeB-S, et al.Health inequalities and income for people with spinal cord injury. A comparison between and within countries. SSM-population Health. 2021;15:100854. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100854. PMID: 34258374; PMCID: PMC8259327.
Unemployment rate (indicator). [Internet]. 2022 [cited Accessed on 11 May 2022].
30.
OñaAAthanasioKTederkoP, et al.To what extent do unmet health care needs explain health inequalities? A direct regression inequality decomposition. Forthcoming. 2022.
31.
ReinhardtJDMansmannUFellinghauerBA, et al.Functioning and disability in people living with spinal cord injury in high-and low-resourced countries: A comparative analysis of 14 countries. Int J Public Health.2011;56(3):341–352.
32.
Pacheco BarzalloDOñaAGemperliA. Unmet health care needs and inequality: A cross-country comparison of the situation of people with spinal cord injury. Health Serv Res.2021;56(Suppl 3):1429-1440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13738.
33.
SindenKEGinisKAMGroupS-SR. Identifying occupational attributes of jobs performed after spinal cord injury: Implications for vocational rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res.2013;36(3):196-204.
34.
BorgSJGeraghtyTAroraM, et al.Employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: A population-based cross-sectional study in Australia. Spinal Cord. 2021;59(10):1120–1131.
35.
OberdabernigDA. Employment effects of innovation in developing countries: A summary. 2016.
36.
Arango-LasprillaJCda Silva CardosoEWilsonLMRomeroMGChanFSungC. Vocational rehabilitation service patterns and employment outcomes for Hispanics with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education. 2011;25(4):149-162.
37.
HollandPNylenLThielenK, et al.How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part II: The impact of active and passive labor market policies. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services. 2011;41(3):415-430.
38.
BraithwaiteJMontD. Disability and poverty: A survey of World Bank poverty assessments and implications. Alter. 2009;3(3):219-232.
39.
AhmedSMahapatroSR. Examining the Effectiveness of Financial Protection Schemes in Reducing Health Inequality. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services. 2023(53(4)): 444–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231179046.
40.
SommetNSpiniD. Financial scarcity undermines health across the globe and the life course. Soc Sci Med.2022;292:114607. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114607. Epub 2021 Nov 27. PMID: 34896727.
41.
AndrasfayTRaymoNGoldmanNPebleyAR. Physical work conditions and disparities in later life functioning: Potential pathways. SSM-Population Health. 2021;16:100990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100990.PMID: 34917747; PMCID: PMC8666356.
KrauseJSReedKS. Barriers and facilitators to employment after spinal cord injury: Underlying dimensions and their relationship to labor force participation. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(2):285-291.
44.
CashinAGØiestadBEAanesenF, et al.Mechanisms of vocational interventions for return to work from musculoskeletal conditions: A mediation analysis of the MI-NAV trial. Occup Environ Med.2023;80(5):246-253.
45.
ScarattiCLeonardiMSilvaggiF, et al.Mapping European welfare models: State of the art of strategies for professional integration and reintegration of persons with chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2018;15(4):781.
46.
EstebanECoenenMItoE, et al.Views and experiences of persons with chronic diseases about strategies that aim to integrate and re-integrate them into work: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2018;15(5):1022.
47.
SabariegoCCoenenMItoE, et al.Effectiveness of integration and re-integration into work strategies for persons with chronic conditions: A systematic review of European strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2018;15(3):552.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
