What does it mean to test theory?

Aguinis H. Cascio W. F. Ramani R. S. (2017). Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(6), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0081-0

Aguinis H. Cronin M. A. (2022). It's the theory, stupid. Organizational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221080629

Berchicci L. King A. A. (2022). Building knowledge by mapping model uncertainty in six studies of social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 43(7), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3374

Bettis R. A. Helfat C. E. Shaver J. M. (2016). The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2580

Cronin M. A. George E. (2023). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507

Cronin M. A. Stouten J. van Knippenberg D. (2021). The theory crisis in management research: Solving the right problem. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0294

Davis M. S. (1971). That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.

Dhanani L. Y. Beus J. M. Joseph D. L. (2018). Workplace discrimination: A meta-analytic extension, critique, and future research agenda. Personnel Psychology, 71(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12254

Elsbach K. D. van Knippenberg D. (2020). Creating high–impact literature reviews: An argument for ‘integrative reviews’. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12581

Forscher B. K. (1963). Chaos in the brickyard. Science, 142(3590), 339–339.

Geyskens I. Krishnan R. Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. Cunha P. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328501

Hambrick D. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346–1352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166119

Kacmar K. M. Whitfield J. M. (2000). An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810034005

Köhler T. Cortina J. M. (2021). Play it again, Sam! An analysis of constructive replication in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 47(2), 488–518. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0149206319843985

Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos I. Musgrave A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965 (vol. 4, pp. 205–259). New York, NY: Springer.

Laudan L. (1978). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth (Vol. 282). University of California Press.

Le H. Schmidt F. L. Harter J. K. Lauver K. J. (2010). The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.02.003

Leavitt K. Mitchell T. R. Peterson J. (2010). Theory pruning: Strategies to reduce our dense theoretical landscape. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 644–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109345156

Lipton P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Martin X. van den Oever K. (2013). Progress, maturity or exhaustion? Sources and modes of theorizing on the international strategy—performance relationship (1990–2011). In Devinney T. M. Pedersen T. Tihanyi L. (Eds.) Advances in international management (pp. 331–361). Emerald.

Morgan S. L. Winship C. (2014). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in science. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25303/reproducibility-and-replicability-in-science

Pillutla M. M. Thau S. (2013). Organizational sciences’ obsession with “that’s interesting!”: Consequences and an alternative. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386613479963

Popper K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.

Tsang E. W. K. (2022). That's interesting! A flawed article has influenced generations of management researchers. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926211048708

Van Knippenberg D. Lee D. (2023). Supervisor’s organizational embodiment is leader group prototypicality: Addressing construct redundancy through replication. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 1(1): 42–71.

Van Knippenberg D. Sitkin S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.759433

Zhao H. Liu Q. (2022). Entrepreneurial passion: A meta-analysis of three measures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211069858