Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Few studies have explored the mental health of Autistic working parents, despite mental health being a research priority for Autistic people. This scoping review aimed to assess the type and extent of evidence relating to the mental health of Autistic working parents. Utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews, a total of 9,486 records were screened, with 12 studies included. Data were charted using a data extraction template. Data extracted for each source study included: title, year of publication, author(s), country/region of origin, aim(s), population/sample size, proportion of Autistic working parents in study population, sex and/or gender of Autistic participants, method, mental health measures, and findings. The review identified that more research is needed to establish if the intersection of being Autistic, employed, and a parent (including parenting neurodivergent children) leads to differences in mental health in Autistic working parents compared to other populations and to determine if tailored supports are required for Autistic working parents.

Lay Abstract

Currently, there is limited research that explores the mental health of Autistic working parents, even though Autistic people have identified mental health as a priority area of research and support. The current study is a scoping review on the mental health of Autistic working parents. A scoping review is a method used by researchers to better understand the type and extent of previous research on a particular topic. An initial search found 9,486 potentially relevant research articles, which were screened to determine if they met specific criteria related to the topic. Screening identified 12 relevant research studies that were included in the review. The data in these 12 studies was organised into a table to analyse key characteristics related to the type of study, the study aim(s), the study location, participant details, and key findings. The data obtained from each study included: title, year of publication, author(s), country of origin, aim(s), population/sample size, proportion of Autistic working parents in study population, sex and/or gender of Autistic participants, method, mental health measures, and findings. The review showed that more research is needed in a few main areas. Firstly, whether the mental health of Autistic parents with a job is different than other groups. Secondly, it is also important to include Autistic working parents who are raising neurodivergent children. More research also needs to look into whether Autistic working parents would benefit from customised supports.

Keywords

autism spectrum disorder Autistic parent mental health gender family support

Introduction

Autistic¹ people have identified their mental health as one of several research priorities (Pearson et al., 2022; Roche et al., 2020). Prior studies have examined how Autistic experiences related to gender (Sedgewick et al., 2021), employment (Nicholas et al., 2019), and recently, parenting (Pohl et al., 2020), influence mental health. However, most studies have examined parenting and employment separately, with few studies exploring the mental health of Autistic working parents (Gore et al., 2023). The current study aimed to review the literature relevant to the mental health of Autistic working parents to better understand their mental health support needs.

Autistic mental health and employment

Autistic people have higher incidences of mental health conditions compared to non-Autistic people (e.g., DaWalt et al., 2021; Lai et al., 2019; Lever & Geurts, 2016). Gender diverse Autistic people and Autistic women also have higher rates of mental health symptoms, such as anxiety and eating disorder symptoms, than Autistic men (Sedgewick et al., 2021). This discrepancy may be partially explained by men having greater privileges in society (Sedgewick et al., 2021) and a later average age of diagnosis for Autistic women, reducing their access to supports during youth (Beck et al., 2020; Tint et al., 2018).

Autism employment literature reports how work can positively influence mental wellbeing through providing purpose, financial independence, and social benefits (Hayward et al., 2019; Johnson & Joshi, 2016; Nicholas et al., 2019). However, social-communication differences, sensory sensitivities, difficulties seeking adjustments, bullying, and a lack of understanding and acceptance of Autistic people within workplaces can contribute to increased stress in Autistic adults (Hayward et al., 2020; Johnson & Joshi, 2016; Nicholas et al., 2019).

Mental health and parenthood – Autistic and non-Autistic

The transition to parenthood can challenge the mental health of Autistic and non-Autistic parents (Cooklin et al., 2015; Highet, 2022; Pohl et al., 2020). In non-Autistic mothers, factors associated with poor mental health include low socio-economic status, prior mental health diagnoses, being a single parent, and having few supports (Crosier et al., 2007; Ogbo et al., 2018; Schmied et al., 2013). Another factor for non-Autistic mothers is having neurodivergent (e.g. Autistic) children (DePape & Lindsay, 2015). Studies demonstrate higher stress levels, more mental health conditions, and lower quality of life in parents of Autistic children compared to parents of non-Autistic children (DePape & Lindsay, 2015; Giallo et al., 2013; Samsell et al., 2022).

There is a paucity of literature considering Autistic parents (McDonnell & DeLucia, 2021). The few known studies report that Autistic mothers enjoy the parent–child bond (Dugdale et al., 2021; Hwang & Heslop, 2022; Winnard et al., 2021), but report higher incidences of mental health conditions compared to non-Autistic mothers during and after pregnancy (e.g., Hampton 2022a, 2022b, 2022c; Pohl et al., 2020).

Mental health of working parents – non-Autistic and Autistic

In non-Autistic working parents, there is substantial research investigating their mental health and exploration of gender differences in mental health (e.g., Cooklin et al., 2015; Kramer & Pak, 2018; Reich-Stiebert et al., 2023). Studies report that working mothers, compared to working fathers, experience more negative mental health symptoms. This seems to be due, but not limited, to contributing more unpaid domestic work, juggling caregiving and work roles, and other factors such as income inequality, increased likelihood of insecure work, and barriers to career advancement (Cooklin et al., 2016; Craig & Churchill, 2021; Reich-Stiebert et al., 2023).

To the authors’ knowledge, there is no detailed examination of the mental health of Autistic working parents. Recent qualitative research involving 10 Autistic working mothers was one of the first studies to discuss mental health in this population, although the research focus was not specifically on mental health (Gore et al., 2023). The majority of study participants reported having an anxiety disorder and discussed factors which may contribute to participant mental wellbeing (Gore et al., 2023). These factors included employment, associated with positive mental health, and challenges associated with stress and overwhelm including time pressure, financial pressure, and employment-related challenges relating to disclosure, adjustments, and career stagnation (Gore et al., 2023).

Current review objectives

The objectives of this scoping review were to assess the extent and type of evidence concerning the mental health of Autistic working parents, to understand their mental health support needs to optimally manage their quality of life. A search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and JBI Evidence Synthesis databases indicated no current or underway scoping reviews on the topic. The key research question was ‘What is known from the existing literature about the mental health of Autistic working parents?’

Method

The scoping review was conducted utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews (Peters et al., 2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR; Tricco et al., 2018) checklist. A protocol was developed in consultation with the co-authors and a La Trobe University librarian. The protocol was not published before conducting the review (available on request from corresponding author).

Information sources and search strategy

The search strategy aimed to find published research and grey literature. Key search concepts were (1) autism, (2) employment, (3) parent or caregiver, and (4) mental health. Prior testing by the first author K.G. found literature when all four concepts were entered together in MEDLINE. An initial list of search terms was developed from reviewing the keywords, index terms, and text words contained in titles and abstracts of relevant articles. This list was refined in consultation with a La Trobe University librarian and all co-authors (see Table 1 for final search terms).

Table 1.

Scoping review search terms by concept.

Concept	Search terms
Parent	parent* OR caregiver OR carer OR mother* OR father* OR family
Autism	autis* OR asperg* OR autism spectrum disorder OR ASD OR autism spectrum conditions OR Autistic disorder OR neurodevelopmental disorders OR neurodiver* OR developmental disorder
Employment	employ* OR work* OR job OR career OR vocation* OR occupation OR unemployment OR return to work OR teleworking
Mental health	mental health OR mental disorder OR wellbeing OR quality of life OR QoL OR co-morbid conditions OR co-occurring conditions OR depression OR anxiety OR stress

Initial testing of these search terms identified a large proportion of articles about parents of Autistic children, where participants were not asked whether they were Autistic. This did not improve with additional search restrictions, such as proximity of words relating to ‘autism’ and ‘parent’. Therefore, a full text review of all participants sections was required to isolate sources that included employed Autistic parents.

The main data retrieval occurred in October 2022, with alerts for new articles created for each data base. An additional search was performed in May 2023, identifying further literature, followed by a final search in February 2024 that identified no further relevant literature. Sources included academic databases of peer-reviewed journals and grey literature, as outlined in Table 2. Search terms related to all four concepts of interest were entered for all searches. See Supplemental material for a copy of MEDLINE search string.

Table 2.

Scoping review databases.

Peer-reviewed journals		Grey literature sources	Other sources
Platform	Database
EBSCOhost	CINAHL	Web of Science core collection	Google Scholar
	Human Resources Abstracts	Trove
	Business Source Ultimate	ProQuest Dissertations
Informit	Business Collection	ProQuest Conference Papers & Proceedings
OVID	MEDLINE
	PsychINFO

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Study design inclusion criteria included literature reviews, dissertations, and conference proceedings. Where possible, databases were limited to only include studies of adult populations. Due to time and budgetary constraints, only studies published in English were included. There was no historical date limitation, with all studies included up until the end of the data extraction period of 8 February 2024.

Participant inclusion criteria were: (1) aged 18 years and above, (2) self-identified or formally diagnosed Autistic, (3) a caregiver or parent to a child, with no child age limit, (4) employment status as ‘currently working, recently employed, or seeking employment’. The scoping review criteria also included articles where Autistic working parents were a subgroup of study participants and specific findings relevant to this population could be identified and extracted, given the scant existing literature focused only on this population.

Study selection

The results of the systematic search and study selection are presented in Figure 1 (Tricco et al., 2018). All search results were downloaded into EndNote 21 (The EndNote Team, 2013) and then uploaded into Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation, 2022). All duplicate records were removed by Covidence, leaving 8,573 titles screened against the inclusion criteria for eligibility, followed by the abstract. After records passed the initial screening, additional screening of the participants sections occurred to determine if Autistic working parents were identified in the study population. A second reviewer (external to the research team) screened 394 (4.6%) of potential records against the inclusion criteria, with 94.2% agreement. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by independent blind review by author M.G.

Figure 1.

PRISMA-ScR flow diagram of study selection process.

The next phase reviewed the full text of 224 articles. Reasons for excluding sources were noted for reporting. A second reviewer (external to the research team) screened 44 (19.6%) of the full text articles against the inclusion criteria (92.2% agreement). Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by independent blind review by author M.G. The reference lists of all included studies were reviewed and identified five additional studies. A total of 12 studies were identified.

Data extraction and analysis

Data was extracted from each source and charted into a table in Covidence according to fields developed by author K.G. during the scoping review protocol development (see Supplemental material). The following data was charted from each source study: title, year of publication, author(s), country of origin, aim(s), population/sample size, proportion of Autistic working parents in study population, sex/gender of Autistic participants, method, intervention type and detail (if applicable), mental health measures and results.

Community involvement

K.G., who led the study, is an Autistic researcher with lived experience as an Autistic working parent and a psychologist. Members of the supervisory team are also neurodivergent/multiply neurodivergent, including Autistic, and some are working parents.

Results

The 12 identified articles are charted in Table 3.

Table 3.

Summary of scoping review results.

Authors	Study source	Country of study	Study aims	Method	Total number of participants	Sex at birth or gender identity of participants±	Proportion of Autistic working parents in sample^	Number of Autistic working parents in sample	Mental health measures used	Study findings
Bundy et al. (2022)	Citation search – journal	The United Kingdom	Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of Autistic adults in the United Kingdom	Mixed methods	133 Autistic	63.2% female* 28.6% male* 6% non-binary/bigender* 4.5% cisgender* 3.8% other* 3% gender neutral* 0.8% transgender*	54.1% employed 48.1% live with partner and/or children	Unable to calculate	Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale – 21 questions (DASS-21)	While anxiety and stress scores reduced over time in whole sample, some participants reported a substantial decrease in mental health. Qualitative data reported mental health insights related to family dynamics, reduced social demands, and sensory regulation
Donovan (2017)	Grey literature – dissertation	The United States	Experiences of Autistic mothers during childbirth in an acute care setting	Qualitative	24 Autistic	100% women	50% Autistic working parents	12		Autistic mothers reported issues including miscommunication with health workers, sensory issues, loss of control, and lack of understanding of Autistic preferences
Dugdale et al. (2021)	Citation search – journal	The United Kingdom	Experiences of Autistic mothers	Qualitative	9 Autistic	100% female	80% Autistic working parents	7		Autistic mothers identified joy and benefits from motherhood as well as challenges, particularly with social communication and misunderstandings with professionals
Gore et al. (2023)	Academic database – journal	Australia	Challenges, benefits, and support needs of Autistic working mothers	Qualitative	10 Autistic	100% female	100% Autistic working parents	10		Autistic working mothers reported that work contributes to wellbeing, challenges of being an Autistic working mother, and difficulty in accessing support and understanding with an invisible disability
Griffiths et al. (2019)	Academic database – journal	The United Kingdom	Frequency of negative life experiences in Autistic adults and associations with mental health symptoms	Quantitative	426 Autistic 268 non-Autistic	Autistic sample: 40% male, 47% female, 12% transgender, non-binary, other	Autistic sample: 52% employed 35% parents	Unable to calculate	Satisfaction with Life Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item, General Anxiety Disorder 7-item, Autistic Quotient 10-item, Vulnerability Experiences Quotient	Autistic adults found to be more vulnerable than non-Autistic adults in areas related to domestic abuse, contact with social services (for Autistic parents), financial exploitation and hardship, as well as more anxiety, depression, and lower life satisfaction
Heyworth et al. (2022)	Academic database – journal	Australia	Experiences of Autistic parents during early COVID-19	Qualitative	35 Autistic	94% woman# 3% man# 3% non-binary	51% Autistic working parents	18		Participants reported that COVID made some aspects of life simpler, but also created new pressures. Mental health was impacted by pressures and lack of formal support. Autistic insights supported family life
Lilley et al. (2023)	Citation search – journal	Australia	How late-diagnosed Autistic adults create shared Autistic identity with others	Qualitative	26 Autistic	53.9% female 38.5% male 3.8% non-binary 3.8% prefer not to say	73.1% have children % employed not reported, but some employment-related findings	Unable to calculate		Insights on how late-diagnosed adults create shared Autistic identity in their family and the important role of a wider community
Maljaars et al. (2023)	Citation search – journal	Europe	Impact of COVID-19 on Autistic and non-Autistic adults	Quantitative	196 Autistic 228 non-Autistic	Autistic sample: 70% female 24% male 6% other	Autistic sample: 64% employed 29% live with partner and children	Unable to calculate	Perceived Stress Scale	Autistic adults reported less negative impact on their social life and more negative impact on health and support services compared to non-Autistic adults. Adults described a range of coping strategies used.
Nagib and Wilton (2020)	Academic database – journal	Canada	Role of gender in career exploration and job-seeking experiences of Autistic adults	Qualitative	507 Autistic	49.7% women 50.3% men	Not reported, but working parent responsibilities referred to in some participant responses	Unable to calculate		Found similarities between genders in career exploration and job seeking. Key differences were women being advised to apply for service and caring jobs and more women withdrew due to gendered expectations around caring for children at home
Nagib (2020)	Grey literature – dissertation chapter	Canada	How domestic roles, gender, and self-care strategies influence experiences of Autistic women	Qualitative	371 Autistic	100% women	100% Autistic working parents	371		Managing work-family responsibilities is influenced by gender, role, and disability. Finding that individual support strategies are required
Pellicano et al. (2022)	Academic database – journal	Australia	Impact of COVID-19 on social isolation and mental health of Autistic people and their families	Qualitative	44 Autistic adults 49 non-Autistic parents of Autistic children 35 Autistic parents of Autistic children 16 Autistic young people	Autistic parents of Autistic children: 91% women# 6% men# 3% non-binary	Autistic parents: 51% working parents, pre-COVID 19	18		All participants, reported being impacted by the loss of everyday routines and missing social connections
Talcer et al. (2023)	Citation search – journal	The United Kingdom	Sensory experiences of Autistic mothers	Qualitative	7 Autistic	100% women	100% parents % employed not reported, subtheme 3.2 discusses work impact	Unable to calculate		Sensory experiences discussed during antenatal period and during motherhood with the impact of difficulties on health and wellbeing

Note. ±Terminology for sex or gender of participants reflects original study terminology.

^Percentage in paid employment only is reported. When total percentage of working parents is not reported, table reports on percentage of Autistic participants who are parents and percentage employed. Hypothesis that some of the Autistic parents will also be employed.

*Participants in these studies could select more than one gender identity.

#Female and male included transgender in these studies.

Study characteristics

Studies were based in the United Kingdom (n = 4, 33.3%), Australia (n = 4, 33.3%), Canada (n = 2, 16.7%), the United States (n = 1, 8.3%) and European countries (n = 1, 8.3%). Study designs included nine qualitative, two quantitative, and one mixed-methods study. Sources were journals from academic databases (n = 10, 83.3%) and dissertations (n = 2, 16.7%). Year of publication ranged from 2017 to 2023. See Supplemental material for further information.

Participant characteristics

All studies (n = 12, 100%) included self-report data from Autistic adults and three studies (25%) included data from a non-Autistic comparison group (Griffiths et al., 2019; Maljaars et al., 2023; Pellicano et al., 2022). Six studies (50%) reported on the number of Autistic working parents in their sample. The number ranged from 50% to 100% of each study's sample, which amounted to 436 Autistic working parents across six studies (Donovan, 2017; Dugdale et al., 2021; Gore et al., 2023; Heyworth et al., 2022; Nagib, 2020; Pellicano et al., 2022). Two (16.7%) of these six studies had a participant sample wholly comprised of Autistic working parents, all women (100%; Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). Three studies (25%) did not report the proportion of Autistic working parents in their participant sample but had findings regarding this population (Lilley et al., 2023; Nagib & Wilton, 2020; Talcer et al., 2023). Three studies (25%) reported employment and living situation separately, with living situation including ‘with partner and/or child/ren’ (Bundy et al., 2022; Griffiths et al., 2019; Maljaars et al., 2023). These three studies were included on the premise that some participants would have existed in both categories, that is, being employed and living with their children.

Sex/gender

Five studies (41.7%) included only Autistic people who identified as women/female (Donovan, 2017; Dugdale et al., 2021; Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020; Talcer et al., 2023). The proportion of Autistic participants identifying as men/male in the remaining seven studies (58.3%) ranged from 3% to 50.3% (Bundy et al., 2022; Griffiths et al., 2019; Heyworth et al., 2022; Lilley et al., 2023; Maljaars et al., 2023; Nagib & Wilton, 2020; Pellicano et al., 2022). Five studies (41.7%) included Autistic participants who identified with genders other than man or woman – for example, non-binary, gender neutral – with proportions ranging from 3% to 12% (Bundy et al., 2022; Griffiths et al., 2019; Heyworth et al., 2022; Lilley et al., 2023; Pellicano et al., 2022).

Co-occurring mental health conditions

Gore et al. (2023) was the only study to report data on the occurrence of mental health conditions in Autistic working parents. In a sample of 10 Autistic working mothers, nine self-reported having an anxiety disorder and five self-reported depression (Gore et al., 2023). All review studies that reported on mental health measures completed by Autistic people did not extract findings specific to Autistic working parents.

Mental health-related findings specific to Autistic working parents

The studies by Gore et al. (2023) and Nagib (2020) reported specifically on the experiences of Autistic working mothers and included some findings related to their mental health.

When reflecting on their role as a parent, Autistic working mothers outlined the positive bond and loving relationship with their children (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). However, they also identified challenges relating to sensory and caring demands. Participants in Nagib's (2020) and Gore et al.'s (2023) studies outlined experiences of sensory challenges at home including difficulty tolerating noise, touch, visual mess and smells from their children. Overstimulation was reported to negatively impact mental health, with descriptions including ‘overload’ and ‘torture’ (Nagib, 2020, p. 115). In respect to caring demands, Autistic working mothers in both studies reported prioritising their children's needs over their own, sometimes leading to negative consequences for their own mental wellbeing through reduced time for self-care (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). Parenting a neurodivergent child was also linked to additional demands in supporting the child at home, at school, and in the community in the studies by Gore et al. (2023) and Nagib (2020). These additional demands included social communication challenges in interactions with other parents, teachers, health professionals, support organisations and family members (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). Autistic working mothers discussed two-way miscommunication with non-Autistic professionals when advocating for themselves or their child in the aforementioned settings (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). Participants reported that miscommunication challenges resulted in them feeling ‘quite depressed’ (Nagib, 2020, p. 111).

When reflecting on their employment, Autistic working mothers in Gore et al. (2023, p. 5) described how employment contributed to their positive self-esteem, creating an identity beyond being ‘someone's mum’. Autistic working mothers in the same study also discussed the importance of the financial independence, due to employment, on their self-esteem (Gore et al., 2023). However, the need to sacrifice income for job flexibility to manage their caring responsibilities was identified as negatively impacting mental health by participants in both Gore et al. (2023) and Nagib (2020). Another key challenge in the workplace identified by Autistic working mothers in Nagib (2020) was interpersonal communication and managing increased sensory input in an open-plan workplace.

Autistic working mothers in both studies identified how access to workplace adjustments can reduce stress. For example, Nagib (2020, p. 121) reported how flexibility with work times and the ability to work from home was ‘key to … survival’ and Gore et al. (2023) reported a lack of workplace understanding of autism can lead to Autistic working mothers feeling unsafe to disclose being Autistic and request adjustments.

Autistic working mothers in Gore et al. (2023) and Nagib (2020) reported challenges specific to being a working parent that appeared to influence mental health. Key challenges included juggling parenting, work, and domestic duties (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). Autistic working mothers described that juggling multiple roles resulted in negative mental health symptoms, including stress, overwhelm, fatigue, and Autistic burnout (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020).

When discussing supports, Autistic working mothers in Gore et al. (2023) and Nagib (2020) mentioned the lack of specialised supports for employed Autistic mothers. In addition, participants in the study by Gore et al. (2023) reported negative experiences in applying for supports or when engaging with professionals who did not understand autism. The latter resulted in participants feeling misunderstood, not receiving support, and, in some cases, giving up on seeking support (Gore et al., 2023).

Discussion

The current scoping review aimed to investigate current literature on the mental health of Autistic working parents. While 12 studies were identified, only two of these studies had study populations wholly comprised of Autistic working parents, all cisgendered women (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020). In this small sample, the review found that Autistic working mothers experience multiple social communication demands that may negatively influence mental health (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020), consistent with prior research reporting Autistic social communication challenges in employment (Gemma, 2021; Hayward et al., 2020; Johnson & Joshi, 2016; Nicholas et al., 2019) and in parenting (Hwang & Heslop, 2022; Winnard et al., 2021).

Sensory-related findings relevant to Autistic working mothers included additional sensory stimulation from their child/ren (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020) and sensory challenges in the workplace (Nagib, 2020). The findings were similar to those described in prior research about Autistic motherhood (Marriott et al., 2021; Winnard et al., 2021) and in the Autistic employment literature (Harmuth et al., 2018; Lindsay et al., 2021; Weber et al., 2022).

When combining employment and parenting, this review found juggling work and caregiving was associated with reports of greater time demands, stress, burnout, and poor mental health (Gore et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020), consistent with prior literature involving non-Autistic working mothers (Baxter & Tai, 2016; Craig & Churchill, 2021; Dugan & Barnes-Farrell, 2020). However, due to a lack of data, it was unclear whether the level of demand and mental health impact differed between Autistic and non-Autistic working parents. Due to a lack of data, we could not determine from the review which support services and coping strategies were most helpful for Autistic working parents.

Research gaps and future directions

This review revealed several gaps in the current literature regarding the mental health of Autistic working parents, which need to be addressed in future research. This includes a lack of robust mental health data, gaps in participant demographic details that made it challenging to disaggregate data from working and non-working parents, a lack of diversity in participant samples, and methodological issues.

First, this review's mental health findings are dominated by insights from qualitative data, with a lack of mental health measurement to quantify the mental health impact. This gap is compounded by no comparative data contrasting the mental health of Autistic working parents with other groups such as non-Autistic working parents or employed Autistic people who are not parents. Therefore, this review cannot determine whether Autistic working parents have poorer mental health compared to other groups and, therefore, whether they require greater or different mental health support to optimise their quality of life. Future research needs to measure the level of mental health issues and other co-occurring conditions in Autistic working parents compared to other populations, to determine whether this group needs greater and/or specialised supports.

Secondly, many papers that may have been suitable for the review were not included because they did not collect adequate demographic details about the employment and parenting status of participants. This made it impossible to identify if participants were working parents. In addition, the lack of gender diversity in participant samples renders it difficult to generalise findings to all Autistic working parents. Only six of the 12 papers included gender diverse Autistic people and reported no mental health findings specific to gender diverse Autistic working parents. Autistic working fathers were also underrepresented in the review papers, with no specific findings related to their mental health.

Thirdly, review studies did not investigate whether factors such as socio-economic status, being a single parent, a same-sex parent and/or co-parenting arrangements were related to mental health issues. This is despite evidence of these factors impacting mental health in non-Autistic populations (Crosier et al., 2007; Ogbo et al., 2018; Schmied et al., 2013). A further issue was a lack of cultural diversity, with no first nations peoples included in the review, and studies only originating in western countries. Even between western nations, there are significant differences in healthcare, welfare, and employment systems that could impact wellbeing (Béland, 2021), further influencing the generalisability of findings. More research is needed with diverse participant samples, and which considers the context of each country's support systems, to better understand which demographic factors for Autistic working parents are related to poorer mental health outcomes so that supports can be targeted appropriately.

Finally, there were several gaps related to study methods. In the six papers (50%; Donovan, 2017; Dugdale et al., 2021; Gore et al., 2023; Heyworth et al., 2022; Nagib, 2020; Pellicano et al., 2022) where it was possible to calculate the proportion of Autistic working parents in the sample, four papers (33.3%; Donovan, 2017; Dugdale et al., 2021; Heyworth et al., 2022; Pellicano et al., 2022) reported 50% to 80% of their total sample identifiable as working parents making it difficult to extract study findings specific to Autistic working parents. While the Nagib (2020) qualitative study included 371 Autistic working mothers (100% of total sample), the study analysed social media posts where they were unable to verify participant demographic details and whether they were Autistic. Furthermore, in eight of the nine qualitative studies, the research aims were broader than mental health (Donovan, 2017; Dugdale et al., 2021; Gore et al., 2023; Heyworth et al., 2022; Lilley et al., 2023; Nagib, 2020; Nagib & Wilton, 2020; Talcer et al., 2023). While data saturation may have been achieved in relation to the original research question, it may not have been achieved in relation to mental health specifically, given this was not part of the research question of these papers. Therefore, there may be additional insights related to the mental health of Autistic working parents that were not identified in these studies.

Strengths and limitations

A key strength of this review is being the first known scoping review investigating current literature regarding the mental health of Autistic working parents. Inclusion of both peer reviewed and grey literature widened the scope of captured data. A methodological limitation is the inclusion of studies in which Autistic working parents were a subset of participants. This may have led to findings from Autistic adults who were not working parents being generalised to Autistic working parents. Subsequent reviews could focus only on Autistic working parents when there is sufficient published literature. Another area relates to study sample diversity. Although this scoping review included parents of all genders, many studies had a high proportion of participants being women and from western countries. Larger samples with greater gender, socio-economic, and ethnic diversity are needed in future research to generalise findings to all Autistic working parents. A final limitation is that the search strategy may have missed some literature where ‘mental health’ or related terms were not a keyword and/or in the abstract; for for example, a reviewer of this article shared a relevant article by Radev et al. (2024) in which Autistic working parents were a subset of participants. This article was not found during our search and was not included to ensure our search strategy was replicable.

Conclusion

This scoping review identified 12 research studies reporting on the mental health of Autistic working parents. The review revealed that more evidence is needed to determine if mental health in Autistic working parents is influenced by factors such as the intersection of being Autistic, employed, and a parent (including parenting neurodivergent children). Future research should investigate whether there are differences in the mental health of Autistic working parents compared to other populations. This will enable better understanding as to whether Autistic working parents require tailored supports.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-ndy-10.1177_27546330241272174 - Supplemental material for Investigating the mental health of Autistic working parents: A scoping review

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ndy-10.1177_27546330241272174 for Investigating the mental health of Autistic working parents: A scoping review by Katherine Gore, Melissa Gilbert, Susan M Hayward, Rebecca L Flower and Josephine Barbaro in Neurodiversity

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-2-ndy-10.1177_27546330241272174 - Supplemental material for Investigating the mental health of Autistic working parents: A scoping review

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-ndy-10.1177_27546330241272174 for Investigating the mental health of Autistic working parents: A scoping review by Katherine Gore, Melissa Gilbert, Susan M Hayward, Rebecca L Flower and Josephine Barbaro in Neurodiversity

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Author K.G. received a PhD research scholarship from La Trobe University to support this article's research and authorship. All other authors received no financial support for research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Katherine Gore

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Notes

References

Baxter

Tai

(2016). Inequalities in unpaid work: A cross-national comparison. In Connerley

M. L.

(Eds.), Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 653–671). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_36.

Beck

J. S.

Lundwall

R. A.

Gabrielsen

Cox

J. C.

South

(2020). Looking good but feeling bad: “Camouflaging” behaviors and mental health in women with autistic traits. Autism, 24(4), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320912147

Béland

(2021). The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press USA – OSO.

Bundy

Mandy

Crane

Belcher

Bourne

Brede

Hull

Brinkert

Cook

(2022). The impact of early stages of COVID-19 on the mental health of autistic adults in the United Kingdom: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Autism, 26(7), 1765–1782. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211065543

Cooklin

A. R.

Dinh

Strazdins

Westrupp

Leach

L. S.

Nicholson

J. M.

(2016). Change and stability in work–family conflict and mothers’ and fathers’ mental health: Longitudinal evidence from an Australian cohort. Social Science & Medicine, 155, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.036

Cooklin

A. R.

Giallo

Strazdins

Martin

Leach

L. S.

Nicholson

J. M.

(2015). What matters for working fathers? Job characteristics, work-family conflict and enrichment, and fathers’ postpartum mental health in an Australian cohort. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.028

Craig

Churchill

(2021). Working and caring at home: Gender differences in the effects of COVID-19 on paid and unpaid labor in Australia. Feminist Economics, 27(1-2), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1831039

Crosier

Butterworth

Rodgers

(2007). Mental health problems among single and partnered mothers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0125-4

DaWalt

L. S.

Taylor

J. L.

Movaghar

Hong

Kim

Brilliant

Mailick

M. R.

(2021). Health profiles of adults with autism spectrum disorder: Differences between women and men. Autism Research : Official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 14(9), 1896–1904. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2563

10.

DePape

A. M.

Lindsay

(2015). Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with autism spectrum disorder. Qualitative Health Research, 25(4), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314552455

11.

Donovan

(2017). The experiences of autistic women during childbirth in the acute care setting (Publication Number 10618639) [Ph.D.]. Widener University. ProQuest One Academic. United States – Pennsylvania. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1949666351

12.

Dugan

A. G.

Barnes-Farrell

J. L.

(2020). Working mothers’ second shift, personal resources, and self-care. Community, Work & Family, 23(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1449732

13.

Dugdale

A.-S.

Thompson

A. R.

Leedham

Beail

Freeth

(2021). Intense connection and love: The experiences of autistic mothers. Autism, 25(7), 1973–1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211005987

14.

Gemma

(2021). Reconceptualising ‘reasonable adjustments’ for the successful employment of autistic women. Disability & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1971065

15.

Giallo

Wood

C. E.

Jellett

Porter

(2013). Fatigue, wellbeing and parental self-efficacy in mothers of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 17(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361311416830

16.

Gore

Hayward

Flower

Gilbert

Barbaro

(2023). “Maybe No one knows we need help”: Understanding the experiences of autistic working mothers in Australia. Autism in Adulthood, 6(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2022.0089

17.

Griffiths

Allison

Kenny

Holt

Smith

Baron-Cohen

(2019). The vulnerability experiences quotient (VEQ): A study of vulnerability, mental health and life satisfaction in autistic adults. Autism Research, 12(10), 1516–1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2162

18.

Hampton

Allison

Aydin

Baron-Cohen

Holt

(2022a). Autistic mothers’ perinatal well-being and parenting styles. Autism: The International Journal of Research & Practice, 26(7), 1805–1820. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211065544

19.

Hampton

Man

Allison

Aydin

Baron-Cohen

Holt

(2022b). A qualitative exploration of autistic mothers’ experiences I: Pregnancy experiences. Autism, 27(5), 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132435

20.

Hampton

Man

Allison

Aydin

Baron-Cohen

Holt

(2022c). A qualitative exploration of autistic mothers’ experiences II: Childbirth and postnatal experiences. Autism, 26(5), 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211043701

21.

Harmuth

Silletta

Bailey

Adams

Beck

Barbic

S. P.

(2018). Barriers and facilitators to employment for adults with autism: A scoping review. Annals of International Occupational Therapy, 1(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.3928/24761222-20180212-01

22.

Hayward

S. M.

McVilly

K. R.

Stokes

M. A.

(2019). “I would love to just be myself”: What autistic women want at work. Autism in Adulthood, 1(4), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0020

23.

Hayward

S. M.

McVilly

K. R.

Stokes

M. A.

(2020). Sources and impact of occupational demands for autistic employees. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 76, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101571

24.

Heyworth

Brett

den Houting

Magiati

Steward

Urbanowicz

Stears

Pellicano

(2022). “I’m the family ringmaster and juggler”: Autistic parents’ experiences of parenting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Autism in Adulthood, 5(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0097

25.

Highet

(2022). Emotional and mental health challenges of expectant and new parents – what can midwives do to improve outcomes in pregnancy, birth and early parenthood. Women and Birth, 35(Suppl. 1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.07.067

26.

Hwang

S. K.

Heslop

(2022). Autistic parents’ personal experiences of parenting and support: Messages from an online focus group. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(1), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac133

27.

Johnson

T. D.

Joshi

(2016). Dark clouds or silver linings? A stigma threat perspective on the implications of an autism diagnosis for workplace well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000058

28.

Kramer

K. Z.

Pak

(2018). Relative earnings and depressive symptoms among working parents: Gender differences in the effect of relative income on depressive symptoms. Sex Roles, 78(11–12), 744–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0848-6

29.

Lai

M.-C.

Kassee

Besney

Bonato

Hull

Mandy

Szatmari

Ameis

S. H.

(2019). Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry, 6(10), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5

30.

Lever

A. G.

Geurts

H. M.

(2016). Psychiatric co-occurring symptoms and disorders in young, middle-aged, and older adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 1916–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2722-8

31.

Lilley

Lawson

Hall

Mahony

Clapham

Heyworth

Arnold

Trollor

Yudell

Pellicano

(2023). “Peas in a pod”: Oral history reflections on autistic identity in family and community by late-diagnosed adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(3), 1146–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05667-z

32.

Lindsay

Osten

Rezai

Bui

(2021). Disclosure and workplace accommodations for people with autism: A systematic review. DIsability and Rehabilitation, 43(5), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1635658

33.

Maljaars

Gijbels

Evers

Spain

Rumball

Happé

Noens

(2023). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily life: Diverse experiences for autistic adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(1), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05437-x

34.

Marriott

Stacey

Hewitt

O. M.

Verkuijl

N. E.

(2021). Parenting an autistic child: Experiences of parents with significant autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(7), 3182–3193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05182-7

35.

McDonnell

C. G.

DeLucia

E. A.

(2021). Pregnancy and parenthood among autistic adults: Implications for advancing maternal health and parental well-being. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0046

36.

Nagib

(2020). In her own voice: juggling work, family, and caregiving roles by women with autism [Degree Doctor of Philosophy]. McMaster University. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25430

37.

Nagib

Wilton

(2020). Gender matters in career exploration and job-seeking among adults with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from an online community. DIsability and Rehabilitation, 42(18), 2530–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1573936

38.

Nicholas

Hedley

Randolph

Raymaker

Robertson

Vincent

(2019). An expert discussion on employment in autism. Autism in Adulthood, 1(3), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.29003.djn

39.

Ogbo

F. A.

Eastwood

Hendry

Jalaludin

Agho

K. E.

Barnett

Page

(2018). Determinants of antenatal depression and postnatal depression in Australia. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1598-x

40.

Pearson

Surtees

Crompton

C. J.

Goodall

Pillai

Sedgewick

Au-Yeung

S. K.

(2022). Editorial: Addressing community priorities in autism research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1040446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040446

41.

Pellicano

Brett

den Houting

Heyworth

Magiati

Steward

Urbanowicz

Stears

(2022). COVID-19, social isolation and the mental health of autistic people and their families: A qualitative study. Autism, 26(4), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211035936

42.

Peters

M. D. J.

Godfrey

McInerney

Munn

Tricco

A. C.

Khalil

(2020). Scoping reviews. In Aromataris

Munn

(Eds.), JBI Manual for evidence synthesis. Joanna Briggs Institute. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12.

43.

Pohl

Crockford

Blakemore

Allison

Baron-Cohen

(2020). A comparative study of autistic and non-autistic women’s experience of motherhood. Molecular Autism, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0304-2

44.

Radev

Freeth

Thompson

A. R.

(2024). ‘I’m not just being difficult … I’m finding it difficult’: A qualitative approach to understanding experiences of autistic parents when interacting with statutory services regarding their autistic child. Autism, 28(6), 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231212794

45.

Reich-Stiebert

Froehlich

Voltmer

J. B.

(2023). Gendered mental labor: A systematic literature review on the cognitive dimension of unpaid work within the household and childcare. Sex Roles, 88(11), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01362-0

46.

Roche

Adams

Clark

(2020). Research priorities of the autism community: A systematic review of key stakeholder perspectives. Autism, 25(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320967790

47.

Samsell

Lothman

Samsell

E. E.

Ideishi

R. I.

(2022). Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with autism spectrum disorder in the United States: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative evidence. Families, Systems, & Health, 40(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000654

48.

Schmied

Johnson

Naidoo

Austin

M. P.

Matthey

Kemp

Mills

Meade

Yeo

(2013). Maternal mental health in Australia and New Zealand: A review of longitudinal studies. Women and Birth, 26(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2013.02.006

49.

Sedgewick

Leppanen

Tchanturia

(2021). Gender differences in mental health prevalence in autism. Advances in Autism, 7(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-01-2020-0007

50.

Talcer

M. C.

Duffy

Pedlow

(2023). A qualitative exploration into the sensory experiences of autistic mothers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(2), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05188-1

51.

Tint

Hamdani

Sawyer

Desarkar

Ameis

S. H.

Bardikoff

Lai

M.-C.

(2018). Wellness efforts for autistic women. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 5(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-018-0148-z

52.

The EndNote Team (2013). EndNote. In (Version EndNote 20) [64-bit]. Clarivate.

53.

Tricco

A. C.

Lillie

Zarin

O’Brien

K. K.

Colquhoun

Levac

Moher

Peters

M. D. J.

Horsley

Weeks

Hempel

Akl

E. A.

Chang

McGowan

Stewart

Hartling

Aldcroft

Wilson

M. G.

Garritty

, …, Straus

S. E.

(2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

54.

Veritas Health Innovation. (2022). Covidence systematic review software. In Veritas Health Innovation.

55.

Weber

Krieger

Häne

Yarker

McDowall

(2022). Physical workplace adjustments to support neurodivergent workers: A systematic review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, Special Edition, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12431

56.

Winnard

Roy

Butler-Coyne

(2021). Motherhood: Female perspectives and experiences of being a parent with ASC. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(5), 2314–2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05122-5

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

0.49 MB