Theory resides in the mind, regarding an external world. While mind and matter are in relation, they are not – and can never be – a singular unity, and how we navigate the ontological gap separating mind from matter makes all the difference for our practices of inquiry, their consequences for the world, and our psychic and professional identities as scholars. That seven commentators offer widely disparate approaches for theorists navigating the relation between thought and action suggests the continuing need to mind the gap.
American Psychiatric Association (2022) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-5-TR(5th ed.)Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2.
ArbabHCorreaGWilsonB (2025) Weaving a fabric of unity: Conversations on education and development. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
3.
ArendtH (1961) Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking Press.
4.
ArendtH (1972) Crises of the republic. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
5.
Baird-ZarsB (2023) Making the ropes: How daily practices in a booming periurban municipality become durable ‘gray’ institutions shaping land use. Land Use Policy129: 106604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106604.
6.
BarnesTSheppardE (2019) Spatial Histories of Radical Geography. Oxford: Wiley.
7.
BorrupTZitcerA (2024) Democracy as creative practice: weaving a culture of civic life. New York: Routledge.
8.
BrandomR (2021) Foreword. In: RortyR (ed) Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, ii-xxvi.
9.
DeFilippisJTeresaB (2020) Why do we always talk about immigrants with a language of ‘difference’? Neighborhood change and conflicts in Queens, New York. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and the City1(1): 42–66.
10.
ElshtainJ (2002) Jane Addams and the dream of American democracy. New York: Basic Books.
11.
ElsonD (2015) Value: The representation of labor in capitalism. London: Verso.
12.
GerlofsB (2023) Monstrous politics: Geography, rights, and the urban revolution in Mexico City. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
13.
HamingtonM (2010) Feminist interpretations of Jane Addams. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
14.
JacksonS (2000) Lines of activity: Performance, historiography, hull-house domesticity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
JonI (2024) Regarding the pain of others: Urban geography after empathy. Urban Geography45(3): 484–494.
16.
LakeR (2024) From professional geography to public geography: From representational certainty to not knowing the answer. The Professional Geographer76(6): 822–830.
17.
LakeRZitcerA (2012) Who says? Authority, voice, and authorship in narratives of planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(4): 389–399.
18.
McFarlaneC (2025) Urban geography I: Conceptualization with and beyond the global-local dialectic. Progress in Human Geography49(1): 99–108.
19.
MitchellD (2008) Confessions of a desk-bound radical. In: MitchellK (ed) Practicing public scholarship: Experiences and possibilities beyond the academy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 99–105.
20.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
MolA (2002) The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
MoskopW (2020) Jane Addams on inequality and political friendship. New York: Routledge.
23.
NarayanP (2023) Experiments in peripheral urbanization: Building and unbuilding commons in urban India. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space41(1): 130–147.
24.
RodriguezA (2021) Diverging space for deviants: The politics of Atlanta’s public housing. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
25.
RortyR (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
RortyR (1989) Contingency, irony, solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
RortyR (2021) Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
RueschemeyerD (2009) Usable theory: Analytic tools for social and political research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
SafranskyS (2023) The city after property: Abandonment and repair in postindustrial Detroit. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
