Abstract
This commentary offers a response to Robert Lake's ‘On resisting the seduction of theory’. Professor Lake is correct that theory seduces, distracts, and is, at times, perhaps even most often, misused and misguided – and much too detached from practice. I argue that theorization is nonetheless essential. It and it alone provides the necessary understanding of our unjust world that allows us the possibility of making it less so.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alford
R
Friedland
R
(1985 ) Powers of Theory . New York: Cambridge University Press .
2.
Bates
L
(2023 ) A research agenda pending revolution . Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 802 –805 .
3.
Dantzler
P
(2021 ) The urban process under racial capitalism . Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and the City 2 (2 ): 113 –134 .
4.
Dawkins
C
(2023 ) Bringing institutions into the opportunity hoarding debate . Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 793 –796 .
5.
DeFilippis
J
(2017 ) Place matters, but maybe not in the ways they think it does… . Urban Affairs Review 53 (1 ): 189 –196 .
6.
Ellen
IG
(2023 ) Neighborhoods matter, and effort to integrate them are not futile . Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 789 –792 .
7.
Greenlee
A
(2023 ) Follow the money (deeper) – a clinical diagnosis of opportunity hoarding . Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 806 –811 .
8.
Imbroscio
D
(2023a ) Beyond opportunity hoarding: interrogating its limits as an account of urban inequalities . Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 770 –788 .
9.
Imbroscio
D
(2023b ) Toward a new project for equality and justice – in housing, and beyond . Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 812 –820 .
10.
Lake
R
(2025 ) On resisting the seduction of theory . Dialogues in Urban Research 3 (1 ): 8 –18 .
11.
Lens
M
(2023 ) What is an opportunity enthusiast to do? Housing Policy Debate 33 (4 ): 797 –801 .
12.
Slater
T
(2021 ) Shaking up the City . Oakland, California: University of California Press .