How do the direction of river flow and the dynamics of power within a river basin affect international conflict and cooperation? Studies of border disputes suggest that the presence of institutionalized agreements can decrease conflict over rivers. What factors determine the likelihood of institutionalized agreements is less well understood. In this paper, we argue that relative hydrological dominance can be a crucial determinant of states’ strategic interests over rivers and willingness to cooperate or engage in river-related militarized interstate disputes, particularly when climate-change-related variability in supply, abundance, and scarcity is accounted for. We test these hypotheses on a global dataset of rivers and the agreements governing them from 1946 to 2018.
BernauerT. (1997). Managing international rivers. In YoungO. (Ed.), Global governance. Drawing insights from the environmental experience (pp. 155–195). MIT Press.
4.
BernauerT. (2002). Explaining success and failure in international river management. Aquatic Sciences, 64(1), 1–19.
De StefanoL.EdwardsP.de SilvaL.WolfA. T. (2010). Tracking cooperation and conflict in international basins: Historic and recent trends. Water Policy, 12(6), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.137
9.
DinarS.KatzD.De StefanoL.BlankenspoorB. (2015). Climate change, conflict, and cooperation: Global analysis of the effectiveness of international river treaties in addressing water variability. Political Geography, 45, 55–66.
10.
DinarS.KatzD.De StefanoL.BlankenspoorB. (2019). Do treaties matter? Climate change, water variability, and cooperation along transboundary river basins. Political Geography, 69, 162–172.
FischhendlerI. (2008). When ambiguity in treaty design becomes destructive: A study of transboundary water. Global Environmental Politics, 8(1), 115–140.
GiblerD. M.TirJ. (2010). Settled borders and regime type: Democratic transitions as consequences of peaceful territorial transfers. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00473.x
15.
GiordanoM. F.GiordanoM. A.WolfA. T. (2005). International resource conflict and mitigation. Journal of Peace Research, 42(1), 47–65.
16.
GleickP. H. (1993). Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security, 18(1), 79–112.
17.
HenselP. R.AllisonM. E.KhananiA. (2009). Territorial integrity treaties and armed conflict over territory. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(2), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894208101126
18.
HenselP. R.MitchellS. M.SowersT. E. (2006). Conflict management of riparian disputes. Political Geography, 25(4), 383–411.
JonesB. T.MattiacciE.BraumoellerB. F. (2017). Food scarcity and state vulnerability: Unpacking the link between climate variability and violent unrest. Journal of Peace Research, 54(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316684662
21.
KeskinenM.KakonenM.TolaP.OlliV. (2007). The Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: Water-related conflicts with abundance of water. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 2(2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.2.2.49
22.
MartyF. (2001). Managing international rivers: Problems, politics, and institutions. Peter Lang.
23.
McCrackenM.WolfA. T. (2019). Updating the Register of International River Basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(5), 732–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1572497
24.
MilmanA.GerlakA. K. (2020). International river basin organization, science, and hydrodiplomacy. Environmental Science and Policy, 107, 137–149.
25.
MirumachiN. (2007). Fluxing relations in water history: Conceptualizing the range of relations in transboundary river basin. Pasts and Futures of Water: Proceedings from the 5th International Water History Association Conference, Tampere, Finland, June 13–17, 2006.
26.
McLaughlin MitchellS.HenselP. R. (2007). International institutions and compliance with agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 721–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00277.x
27.
PalmerG.McManusR. W.D’OrazioV.KenwickM. R.KarstensM.BlochC.DietrichN.KahnK.RitterK.SoulesM. J. (2022). The MID5 dataset, 2011–2014: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 39(4), 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894221995743
28.
Peña-RamosJ. A.BagusP.FursovaD. (2021). Water conflicts in Central Asia: Some recommendations on the non-conflictual use of water. Sustainability, 13(6), 3479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063479
Petersen-PerlmanJ. D.FischhendlerI. (2018). The weakness of the strong: Re-examining power in transboundary water dynamics. International Environmental Agreements, 18(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9387-z
31.
RosendalG. K. (2001). Overlapping international regimes: The case of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF) between climate change and biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1, 447–468.
SchmidtC. J.LeeB. K.MitchellS. M. (2021). Climate bones of contention: How climate variability influences territorial, maritime, and river interstate conflicts. Journal of Peace Research, 58(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320973738
34.
SehringJ. (2020). Unequal distribution: Academic knowledge production on water governance in Central Asia. Water Security, 9, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2019.100057
35.
TirJ.StinnettD. M. (2011). The institutional design of riparian treaties: The role of river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(4), 606–631.
36.
TosetH. P.W.GleditschN. P.HegreH. (2000). Shared rivers and interstate conflict. Political Geography, 19(8), 971–996.
WeiY.WeiJ.LiG.WuS.YuD.GhoreishiM.LuY.SouzaF. A. A.SivapalanM.TianF. (2022). A socio-hydrological framework for understanding conflict and cooperation with respect to transboundary rivers. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26, 2131–2146. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2131-2022
42.
WolfA. T.YoffeS.GiordanoM. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60.
43.
XenariosS.ShenhavR.AbdullaevI.MastellariA. (2018). Current and future challenges of water security in Central Asia. In World Water Council (Ed.), Global water security. Water resources development and management (pp. 117–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7913-9_5
44.
YoffeS.FiskeG.GiordanoM.GiordanoM.LarsonK.StahlK.WolfA. T. (2004). Geography of international water conflict and cooperation: Data sets and applications. Water Resources Research, 40, W05S04. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002530
45.
YoungO. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press.
46.
ZawahriN. A. (2009a). India, Pakistan, and cooperation along the Indus River system. Water Policy, 11(1), 1–20.
47.
ZawahriN. A. (2009b). Third party mediation of international river disputes: Lessons from the Indus River. International Negotiation, 14(2), 281–310.
48.
ZeitounM.MirumachiN. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 8, 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5
49.
ZeitounM.WarnerJ. (2006). Hydro-hegemony – A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2006.054
