This paper reads Indian influencer Urfi Javed as a paradigmatic case of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) celebrity, arguing that her notoriety is a processual enterprise rather than an accident. Situated at the intersection of subversive creativity and platform capitalism, Javed's DIY fashion functions simultaneously as aesthetic dissent and a strategic mechanism for converting structural precarity into viral capital. Drawing on qualitative analysis of her output and press coverage, the paper identifies three mechanisms: bricolage-based DIY as low-cost, high-impact visibility labour, algorithmic amplification produced through paparazzi co-production and engineered controversy, and a postfeminist performance that alternately enacts empowerment and attracts patriarchal scrutiny. Her trajectory reveals how attention economies facilitate the monetisation of ‘subversive frivolity’, potentially challenging Bollywood's class-gender hierarchies while contributing to the commodification of selfhood in digital culture. Ultimately, this study underscores how Javed's blueprint – transforming affective labour into durable brand power – can reshape contemporary DIY celebrification, influence, and self-representation.
AbidinC (2016a) Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media+ Society2(2): 2056305116641342.
2.
AbidinC (2016b) Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers’ fashion brands and# OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia161(1): 86–100.
3.
AlexanderJC (2004) Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory22(4): 527–573.
4.
Banet-WeiserS (2021) Gender, social media, and the labor of authenticity. American Quarterly73(1): 141–144.
5.
BarronL (2017) Social theory in popular culture. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
6.
BhatiaKVPathak-ShelatMAroraP (2024) DIY Education in the digital era: Youth-driven learning strategies and curricula for the future of work opportunities. Education and Information Technologies29(2): 1407–1426.
7.
BonadioMC (2023) Oscar Wilde, Dener Pamplona de Abreu: Approaches of DIY by the use of clothes, appearances, and photographs. DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society.
8.
BourdieuP (1979) La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris, France: Les Éditions de Minuit.
9.
BurawoyM (1979) Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BurgessJE (2007) Vernacular creativity and new media,Queensland University of Technology. Queensland, Australia.
11.
DebordG (1967) The society of the spectacle. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
DriessensO (2013) The celebritization of society and culture: Understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(6): 641–657.
14.
DuffyBE (2017) (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender and aspirational labor in the social media economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
EntwistleJ (2002) The aesthetic economy: The production of value in the field of fashion modelling. Journal of Consumer Culture2(3): 317–339.
FigueredoHG (2024) DIY Practices in 1990s fashion: Notes from Alexander McQueen’s early years (1992–1996). DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society2(1): 60–74.
21.
GantiT (2012) Producing Bollywood: Inside the contemporary Hindi film industry. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
GayP (1996) Consumption and identity at work. London, UK: Sage Publications.
KennedyP (2020) All the better to eat you with!’ the contribution of consumer culture to the rise of predatory capitalism. Journal of Consumer Culture20: 266–284.
KuznetsovSPaulosE (2010) Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries: 295–304. 10.1145/1868914.1868950.
Levi-StraussC (1966) The savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
LipovetskyG (1994) The Empire of Fashion: Dressing Modern Democracy (New French thought series). Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
44.
Mackinney-ValentinM (2017) Fashioning identity: Status ambivalence in contemporary fashion. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
45.
MarshallPD (2021) The commodified celebrity-self: Industrialized agency and the contemporary attention economy. Popular Communication19(3): 164–177.
46.
Martínez-JiménezL (2023) Postfeminist neoliberalization of self-care: A critical discourse analysis of its representation in vogue, cosmopolitan, and Elle. Feminist Media Studies23: 2814–2830.
47.
MarwickAE (2013) Status update: Celebrity, publicity and self-branding in the social media age. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
MorrisonJ (2014) Dorian’s ‘look’: Jean-paul sartre and the divided celebrity. Celebrity Studies5(1): 45–58.
54.
NayarPK (2021) Essays in Celebrity Culture. London, UK: Anthem Press.
55.
NegraDHolmesS (eds) (2011)In the limelight and under the microscope: Forms and functions of female celebrity. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
56.
PolhemusT (1988) Body Styles. Bedfordshire, UK: Lennard Pub.
57.
RahmanOKharbD (2018) Fashion innovativeness in India: Shopping behaviour, clothing evaluation and fashion information sources. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education11(3): 287–298.
SenftTM (2013) Microcelebrity and the branded self. In: Hartley J, Burgess J and Bruns A (eds), A Companion to New Media Dynamics (pp. 346–354). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
TurnerG (2006) The mass production of celebrity: ‘celetoids’, reality TV, and the ‘demotic turn. International Journal of Cultural Studies9(2): 153–165.
ViswamohanAI (2014) Haute couture and the discourse of stardom in globalized times: Sonam kapoor as hindi cinema’s representative fashion icon. South Asian Popular Culture12(2): 73–88.
83.
WissingerE (2015) This year’s model: Fashion, media, and the making of glamour. New York, NY: NYU Press.
84.
WolfMMcQuittyS (2011) Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS Review1: 154–170.
