Fostering the ability of university students to imagine different possible scenarios in the face of complex challenges is essential for social progress. The main objectives of this study were to examine the influence of creative self-concept and critical thinking disposition on university students’ possibility thinking and to analyse the possible moderating role of the cooperative mindset in these relationships. The sample consisted of 375 students from a university in the Basque Country, aged between 19 and 30 years (M = 22.06, SD = 1.46; 57.28% women). The obtained results indicate that creative self-concept, critical thinking disposition, and cooperative mindset are all positively linked to enhanced possibility thinking among students. However, no moderating effect of the cooperative mindset was found in these relationships. These findings have practical implications for educational institutions interested in preparing students not only to face the uncertainties of the future, but also to imagine and create new possibilities in the social and professional spheres.
AizpuruaA.LizasoI.IturbeI. (2018). Learning strategies and reasoning skills of university students. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.02.002
2.
AlmullaM. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929.
3.
Álvarez-HuertaP.MuelaA.LarreaI. (2021). Student engagement and creative confidence beliefs in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100821
4.
Álvarez-HuertaP.MuelaA.LarreaI. (2022). Disposition towards critical thinking and creative confidence beliefs in higher education students: The mediating role of openness to diversity and challenge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101003
5.
Álvarez-HuertaP.MuelaA.LarreaI. (2023). Disposition towards critical thinking and student engagement in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 48, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09614-9
6.
Azkarate-IturbeO.Álvarez-HuertaP.MuelaA.LarreaI. (2024). Cooperative mindset and creative self-concept in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102461
7.
BarnettR. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. McGraw-Hill Education.
8.
BeghettoR. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
9.
BeghettoR. A. (2023). A new horizon for possibility thinking: A conceptual case study of Human × AI collaboration. Possibility Studies & Society, 1(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699231160136
10.
BeghettoR. A.KarwowskiM. (2017). Towards untangling creative self-beliefs. In KarwowskiM.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 1–394). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-07011-3
11.
BoysenM. S. W.LarsenC. T. (2019). Does handoffs promote creativity? A study of a pass-the-baton approach to the development of educational games. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.005
12.
BravoM. J.GalianaL.RodrigoM. F.Navarro-PérezJ.OliverA. (2020). An adaptation of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale in Spanish youth. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100748
13.
CatarinoP.VascoP.LopesJ.SilvaH.MoraisE. (2019). Cooperative learning on promoting creative thinking and mathematical creativity in higher education. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 17, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.15366/REICE2019.17.3.001
14.
ChenQ.LiuD.ZhouC.TangS. (2020). Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(7–8), 1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15201
15.
CraftA. (1999). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203457283
16.
CraftA. (2013). Childhood, possibility thinking and wise, humanising educational futures. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.005
CraftA.CreminT.BurnardP.DragovicT.ChappellK. (2012). Possibility thinking: Culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity?Education 3-13, 41(5), 538–556.
19.
DanversE. (2021). Individualised and instrumentalised? Critical thinking, students and the optics of possibility within neoliberal higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(5), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1592003
20.
FacioneP. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23. https://www.insightassessment.com
21.
FacioneP. A.FacioneN. C.GiancarloC. A. (2000). The disposition towards critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 1, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
22.
GlăveanuV. P. (2020). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020961763
GlăveanuV. P.KarwowskiM.RossW.BeghettoR. A. (2024). Possibility thinking scale: An initial psychometric exploration. Possibility Studies & Society, 2(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699241241827
25.
GraeberD.WengrowD (2021). The dawn of everything: A new history of humanity. Penguin Books.
26.
Hempel-JorgensenA. (2015). Learner agency and social justice: What can creative pedagogy contribute to socially just pedagogies?Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(4), 531–554. https://oro.open.ac.uk/40734/4/PCS.pdf
27.
IntasaoN.HaoN. (2018). Beliefs about creativity influence creative performance: The mediation effects of flexibility and positive affect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, e01810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01810
28.
KarwowskiM.BeghettoR. A. (2018). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190
29.
KarwowskiM.HanM. H.BeghettoR. A. (2019). Towards dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000229
30.
KarwowskiM.LebudaI.WiśniewskaE. (2018). Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 28(1), 45–57.
31.
LeH. V.ChongS. L. (2024). The dynamics of critical thinking skills: A phenomenographic exploration from Malaysian and Vietnamese undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101445
LubartT.Thornhill-MillerB. (2019). Creativity: An overview of the 7Cs of creative thought. In SternbergR. J.FunkeJ. (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 277–305). Heidelberg University Press.
34.
PanA. J.LaiC. F.KuoH. C. (2023). Investigating the impact of a possibility-thinking integrated project-based learning history course on high school students’ creativity, learning motivation, and history knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101214
35.
PaulR.ElderL. (2006). A guide for educators to critical thinking competency standards. Foundation for Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org
36.
PeschlM. F. (2024). Human innovation and the creative agency of the world in the age of generative AI. Possibility Studies & Society, 2(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699241238049
37.
Puente-DiazR.Cavazos-ArroyoJ. (2018). An exploration of some antecedents and consequences of creative self-efficacy among college students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.149
38.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
39.
RoystonR.Reiter-PalmonR. (2019). Creative self-efficacy as mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem-solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 472–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.226
40.
SchacterD.AddisD.BucknerR. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Review Neuroscience, 8, 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2213.
41.
SosuE. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002
42.
SuddendorfT.CorballisM. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 299–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975
43.
Thornhill-MillerB.CamardaA.MercierM.BurkhardtJ. M.MorisseauT.Bourgeois-BougrineS.VinchonF.El HayekS.Augereau-LandaisM.MoureyF.FeybesseC.SundquistD.LubartT. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
44.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M. (2002). Self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
45.
WangX. M.HuangX. T.HanY. H.HuQ. N. (2024). Promoting students’ creative self-efficacy, critical thinking and learning performance: An online interactive peer assessment approach guided by constructivist theory in maker activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101548
46.
WechslerS. M.SaizC.RivasS. F.VendraminiC. M. M.AlmeidaL. S.MundimM. C.FrancoA. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
