This text networks contributions from three disciplines: phenomenological-philosophical perspectives on the Other, current discussions in wisdom research, and developmental models of social perspective-taking. The common theme is the concept of the “other,” which is ambivalent, because, on the one hand, it may produce othering that can be the entry point into vicious circles of xenophobia, hate, and annihilation, but the Other may be the source of responsiveness and wisdom, on the other hand. A deeper understanding of responsiveness in the self-other relation results from a reading of Waldenfels’ philosophy. This sharpens the perspective on wisdom emerging from the relation to the Other, for which the neologism “xenosophia” is suggested, which supports the view that wisdom as xenosophia and xenophobia are opposites. The implications of Waldenfels’ responsive phenomenology for wisdom research are exemplified for two key concepts, intellectual humility and perspective-taking. Finally, for a developmental perspective on responsiveness to the Other, a typological model is proposed with reference to models of social perspective-taking in the tradition of Piaget and Selman. The proposed typology includes four styles of responsiveness: the egocentric, conventional, negotiatory, and xenocentric style. Implications for research are discussed.
AldwinC. M.IgarashiH.LevensonM. R. (2019). Wisdom as self-transcendence. In GlückJ.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 122–143). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.007
2.
AlfanoM.IurinoK.SteyP.RobinsonB.ChristenM.YuF.LapsleyD. (2017). Development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of intellectual humility. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182950
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books 1979.
ArdeltM. (2004). Wisdom as expert knowledge system: A critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept. Human Development, 47(5), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079154
6.
BallantyneN. (2023). Recent work on intellectual humility: A philosopher’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1940252
7.
BassechesM. (1980). Dialectical schemata. A framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking. Human Development, 23, 400–421.
8.
BrienzaJ. P.KungF. Y. H.ChaoM. M. (2021). Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23432-1
9.
BrienzaJ. P.KungF. Y. H.SantosH. C.BobocelD. R.GrossmannI. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000171
10.
ChristenM.AlfanoM.RobinsonB. (2014). The semantic space of intellectual humility [Paper presentation]. European Conference on Social Intelligence, Barcelona, Spain. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/103386/
11.
ChristopherY.NathanE. (2011). Philosophy and the return of violence: Studies from this widening gyre. Continuum.
12.
FisherM. (2022). The chaos machine: The inside story of how social media rewired our minds and our world. Quercus Editions.
13.
GerteisJ.RotemN. (2023). Connecting the “others”: White anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim views in America. The Sociological Quarterly, 64(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2022.2045882
GillespieA.MartinJ. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.05.001
16.
GlăveanuV. P. (2019). Being other: Intersubjectivity, allocentrism and the possible. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12221
GlăveanuV. P.Hanchett HansonM.BaerJ.BarbotB.ClappE. P.CorazzaG. E.HennesseyB.KaufmanJ. C.LebudaI.LubartT.MontuoriA.NessI. J.PluckerJ.Reiter-PalmonR.SierraZ.SimontonD. K.Neves-PereiraM. S.SternbergR. J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395
21.
GlückJ. (2019). Wisdom vs. populism and polarization: Learning to regulate our evolved intuitions. In SternbergR.NusbaumH.GlückJ. (Eds.), Applying wisdom to contemporary world problems (pp. 81–110). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20287-3_4
22.
GlückJ.BluckS. (2013). The MORE life experience model: A theory of the development of personal wisdom. In FerrariM.WeststrateN. M. (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom (pp. 75–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7987-7_4
23.
GlückJ.BluckS.WeststrateN. M. (2019). More on the MORE life experience model: What we have learned (so far). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-018-9661-x
24.
GlückJ.WeststrateN. M. (2022). The wisdom researchers and the elephant: An integrative model of wise behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650
GrossmannI. (2017). Wisdom and how to cultivate it. Review of emerging evidence for a constructivist model of wise thinking. European Psychologist, 22(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000302
27.
GrossmannI. (2018). Dialecticism across the lifespan. Toward a deeper understanding of the ontogenetic and cultural factors influencing dialectical thinking and emotional experience. In Spencer-RodgersJ.PengK. (Eds.), The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism (pp. 135–180). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199348541.003.0005
28.
GrossmannI. (2022). Wisdom: Situational, dispositional, or both? In SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (Eds.), The psychology of wisdom: An introduction (pp. 70–88). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009085724
29.
GrossmannI.DorfmanA.OakesH. (2020). Wisdom is a social-ecological rather than person-centric phenomenon. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.010
30.
GrossmannI.WeststrateN. M.ArdeltM.BrienzaJ. P.DongM.FerrariM.FournierM. A.HuC. S.NusbaumH. C.VervaekeJ. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2020.1750917
31.
HabermasJ. (1983). Moral consciousness and communicative action (LenhardtC.Weber NicholsenS. Trans.). In HabermasJ. (Ed.), Moral consciousness and communicative action (pp. 116–195). MIT Press.
32.
KallaJ. L.BroockmanD. E. (2023). Which narrative strategies durably reduce prejudice? Evidence from field and survey experiments supporting the efficacy of perspective-getting. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12657
33.
KallioE. K. (2015). From causal thinking to wisdom and spirituality: Some perspectives on a growing research field in adult (cognitive) development. Approaching Religion, 5(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.30664/ar.67572
34.
KallioE. K. (Ed.). (2020). Development of adult thinking. Interdisciplinary perspectives on cognitive development and adult learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187464
35.
KaramiS.GhahremaniM.Parra-MartinezF. A.GentryM. (2020). A polyhedron model of wisdom: A systematic review of the wisdom studies in psychology, management and leadership, and education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815263
36.
KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P. (2019). A review of creativity theories: What questions are we trying to answer? In KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 27–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.004
37.
KearneyR.SemonovitchK. (Eds.). (2011). Phenomenologies of the stranger: Between hostility and hospitality. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823292332
KohlbergL.LevineC.HewerA. (1983). The current formulation of the theory. In KohlbergL. (Ed.), Essays on moral development, vol. II. The psychology of moral development (pp. 212–319). Harper & Row.
40.
KramerD. A. (1983). Post-formal operations? A need for further conceptualization. Human Development, 26, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272873
41.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J.RouseS. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174
LevensonM. R.JenningsP. A.AldwinC. M.ShiraishiR. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.2190/xrxm-fyra-7u0x-grc0
47.
LevinasE. (1999). Alterity and transcendence. Columbia University Press.
48.
MartinJ.SokolB. W.ElfersT. (2008). Taking and coordinating perspectives: From prereflective interactivity, through reflective intersubjectivity, to metareflective sociality. Human Development, 51(5–6), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.1159/000170892
49.
MountzA. (2009). The other. In GallaherC.DahlmanC. T.GilmartinM.(Eds.), Key concepts in political geography (pp. 328–338). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279496
50.
NadelhofferT.WrightJ. C. (2017). The twin dimensions of the virtue of humility: Low self-focus and high other-focus. In Sinnott-ArmstrongW.MillerC. B. (Eds.), Moral psychology, volume 5: Virtue and character (pp. 309–342). MIT Press.
51.
NakamuraY. (2000). Xenosophie: Bausteine für eine Theorie der Fremdheit [Xenosophia: Building blocks for a theory of alienness]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
52.
NusbaumH. C. (2019). The breakdown of civic virtues and the problem of hate speech: Is there wisdom in freedom of speech? In SternbergR.NusbaumH.GlückJ. (Eds.), Applying wisdom to contemporary world problems (pp. 111–142). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20287-3_5
53.
PhanL. V.BlackieL. E. R.HorstmannK. T.JayawickremeE. (2021). An integrative framework to study wisdom. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 1159–1182). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00045-5
54.
PiagetJ. (1926). The child’s conception of the world. Routledge & Kegan Paul 1929.
55.
PiagetJ. (1951). Egocentric thought and sociocentric thought. In SmithL.PiagetJ. (Eds.), Sociological studies (pp. 276–286). Routledge.
56.
PiagetJ.WeilA. M. (1951). The development in the child of the idea of homeland and of foreign relationships. UNESCO International Social Science Bulletin, 3(3), 561–578. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000059379
57.
PorterT.BaldwinC. R.WarrenM. T.MurrayE. D.Cotton BronkK.ForgeardM. J. C.SnowN. E.JayawickremeE. (2022). Clarifying the content of intellectual humility: A systematic review and integrative framework. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1975725
58.
PorterT.ElnakouriA.MeyersE. A.ShibayamaT.JayawickremeE.GrossmannI. (2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9
59.
RouhiainenL. (2020). Thinking through artistic research and pathic experience. Research in Arts and Education, 2020(1), 93–106.
ScharffC. (2011). Disarticulating feminism: Individualization, neoliberalism and the othering of ‘Muslim women’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810394613
62.
SelmanR. L. (1980). The growth of personal understanding: Developmental and clinical aspects. Academic Press.
63.
ShakerR.AhmadiD. (2022). Everyday embodied othering experiences of young Muslims in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(19), 4567–4585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2022.2096577
64.
ShakerR.van LanenS.van HovenB. (2021). “No one likes that judgmental look like you are a terrorist.” Sensorial encounters with the Muslim other in Amsterdam. Geoforum, 120, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.014
65.
SioutiI.SpiesT.TuiderE.von UngerH.YildizE. (Eds.). (2022). Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft. Herausforderungen und Konsequenzen für die Forschungspraxis. Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463086
66.
StaudiglM. (2019). Parasitic confrontations: Toward a phenomenology of collective violence. Studia Phaenomenologica, 19, 75–101.
67.
SteppacherA.KellerB.BullikR.SilverC.StreibH. (2024). Mixed-method and longitudinal. Background and profile of our research design. In StreibH.HoodR. W. (Eds.), Faith in development. Mixed-method studies on worldviews and religious styles (pp. 84�114). Bielefeld University Press.
68.
SternbergR. J. (2003). A duplex theory of hate: Development and application to terrorism, massacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology, 7(3), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.299
69.
SternbergR. J. (2005). Foolishness. In JordanJ.SternbergR. (Eds.), A handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives (pp. 331–352). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610486
70.
SternbergR. J. (2018a). FLOTSAM: A model for the development and transmission of hate. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(4), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.25
SternbergR. J. (2019a). Race to Samarra: The critical importance of wisdom in the world today. In GlückJ.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 3–9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.002
73.
SternbergR. J. (2019b). Where have all the flowers of wisdom gone? An analysis of teaching for wisdom over the years. In SternbergR.NusbaumH.GlückJ. (Eds.), Applying wisdom to contemporary world problems (pp. 1–19). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20287-3_1
74.
SternbergR. J. (Ed.). (2020). Perspectives on hate. How it originates, develops, manifests, and spreads. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000180-000
75.
SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (2021). Wisdom: The psychology of wise thoughts, words, and deeds. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894296
StreibH. (2018). What is xenosophia? Philosophical contributions to prejudice research. In StreibH.KleinC. (Eds.), Xenosophia and religion: Biographical and statistical paths for a culture of welcome (pp. 3–21). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74564-0_1 (post-print at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dfx5j).
80.
StreibH.ChenZ. J.HoodR. W. (2020). Categorizing people by their preference for religious styles: Four types derived from evaluation of Faith Development Interviews. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 30(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1664213 (post-print at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d3kbr).
81.
StreibH.HoodR. W.Jr. (2024). Religious styles and types: Studying change and development in worldview and faith. In StreibH.HoodR. W. (Eds.), Faith in development. Mixed-method studies on worldviews and religious styles (pp. 19�42). Bielefeld University Press.
82.
StreibH.HoodR. W.Jr.KleinC. (2010). The religious schema scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2010.481223
83.
StreibH.KleinC. (Eds.). (2018). Xenosophia and religion: Biographical and statistical paths for a culture of welcome. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74564-0
84.
ThomasM. L.BangenK. J.ArdeltM.JesteD. V. (2017). Development of a 12-item abbreviated Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS-12): Item selection and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115595714
85.
ThomasM. L.PalmerB. W.LeeE. E.LiuJ.DalyR.TuX. M.JesteD. V. (2022). Abbreviated San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE-7) and Jeste-Thomas Wisdom Index (JTWI). International Psychogeriatrics, 34, 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610221002684
86.
Van TongerenD. R.GreenJ. D.HulseyT. L.LegareC. H.BromleyD. G.HoutmanA. M. (2014). A meaning-based approach to humility: Relationship affirmation reduces worldview defense. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711404200107
87.
VerhoevenE.DhoestA.PaulussenS. (2023). ‘No room for hate in our country’: Constructing the LGBTI-friendly nation in news discourses after the murder of a gay man in Belgium. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221131080
88.
WaldenfelsB. (1990). Der Stachel des Fremden [The sting of the alien]. Suhrkamp.
89.
WaldenfelsB. (1996). Order in the twilight [Ordnung im Zwielicht] (ParentD. J., Trans.). Ohio University Press. (Original work published 1987)
90.
WaldenfelsB. (1999). Der Anspruch des Fremden [The demand of the alien]. In BreuningerR. (Ed.), Andersheit - Fremdheit - Toleranz [Alterity - Strangeness - Tolerance] (pp. 31–51). Humboldt-Studienzentrum.
91.
WaldenfelsB. (2003). From intentionality to responsivity. In BernetR.MartinoD. J. (Eds.), Phenomenology today: The Schuwer Spep lectures, 1998-2002 (pp. 23–35). Duqesne University.
WaldenfelsB. (2007). The question of the other. The Tang Chun-I lecture for 2004. SUNY Press; The Chinese University Press.
94.
WaldenfelsB. (2011a). Phenomenology of the alien: Basic concepts [Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden] (KozinA.StählerT., Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 2006)
95.
WaldenfelsB. (2011b). Strangeness, hospitality, and enmity. In EckstrandN.YatesC. S. (Eds.), Philosophy and the return of violence: Studies from this widening gyre (pp. 89–100). Continuum International Publishing Group.
WaldenfelsB. (2016). The birth of Ἦθος out of πάθος. Paths of responsive phenomenology. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 37(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj20163716
99.
WaldenfelsB. (2020a). Responsivity and co-responsivity from a phenomenological point of view. Studia Phaenomenologica, 20, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen20202015
100.
WaldenfelsB. (2020b). Theatre as a scene of otherness. In LauK.-Y.NenonT. (Eds.), Phenomenology and the arts: Logos and aisthesis (pp. 99–110). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30866-7_7
101.
WebsterJ. D. (2003). An explanatory analysis of a Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020782619051
102.
WeltenR. (2020). In the beginning was violence: Emmanuel Levinas on religion and violence. Continental Philosophy Review, 53(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09491-z
103.
WrightJ. C.NadelhofferT.Thomson RossL.Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (2018). Be it ever so humble: Proposing a dual-dimension account and measurement of humility. Self and Identity, 17(1), 92–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1327454
104.
ZachryC. E.PhanL. V.BlackieL. E. R.JayawickremeE. (2018). Situation-based contingencies underlying wisdom-content manifestations: Examining intellectual humility in daily life. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), 1404–1415. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby016
