Expanding our sense of the possible: Ten theses for possibility studies

Abstract

By exploring our sense of the possible as a narratively mediated phenomenon, this essay brings possibility studies in dialogue with interdisciplinary narrative studies. It suggests that (1) the possible is entangled with actual life worlds that are heterogeneous spaces of possibility, (2) the possible is crucial to our temporal existence as being in the world with others, (3) narratives shape our sense of the possible, (4) possibility studies can contribute to strengthening our narrative agency, (5) narrative imagination has transformative power, (6) fiction can explore worlds as spaces of possibility, foster perspective awareness, and expand our sense of the possible, (7) the possible exists through processes of interpretation, and hence (narrative) hermeneutics is relevant to possibility studies, (8) our relationship to cultural models of sense-making is a possibility relationship, (9) possibility studies can bring to dialogue memory studies, futures studies and narrative studies, and (10) possibility studies should articulate and evaluate the ethico-political affordances and dangers of different discourses of the possible.

Keywords

Life worlds narrative agency narrative hermeneutics narrative imagination narrative studies possibility studies sense of the possible

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

(2017). Narrative, imagination and extending visions of the possible. Cairns, 3(3), 15–20.

Aristotle. (1451a/1985). Poetics. In Barnes

(Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press.

Brockmeier

(2009). Reaching for meaning: Human agency and the narrative imagination. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 213–233.

Cohn

(1999). The distinction of fiction. Johns Hopkins University Press.

de Beauvoir

(1947/1976). The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. B. Frechtman Citadel Press.

Frege

(1892/2008). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien (pp. 23–46). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Gadamer

H.-G.

(1984). The hermeneutics of suspicion. In Shapiro

Sica

(Eds.), Hermeneutics: Questions and prospects (pp. 54–65). University of Massachusetts Press.

Glăveanu

(2021). The possible: A sociocultural theory. Oxford University Press.

Glăveanu

(2022). Possibility studies: A manifesto. Possibility studies & society. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699221127

10.

Heidegger

(1927/1996). Being and time. Trans. Stambaugh

SUNY Press.

11.

Holzkamp

(1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Campus.

12.

Lueg

Lundholt

(Eds.) (2021). Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. Routledge.

13.

Meretoja

(2018). The ethics of storytelling: Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible. Oxford University Press.

14.

Meretoja

(2021). A dialogics of counter-narratives. In Lueg

Lundholt

M. W.

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives (pp. 30–42). Routledge.

15.

Meretoja

(2022). Implicit narratives and narrative agency: Evaluating pandemic story-telling. Narrative Inquiry. Online First 19 April 2022. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21076.mer

16.

Ricoeur

(1990/1992). Oneself as another. Trans. Blamey

University of Chicago Press.

17.

Salmi

(2011). Cultural history, the possible, and the principle of plenitude. History and Theory, 50, 171–187.

18.

Solnit

(2016). Hope in the dark: Untold histories, wild possibilities. Canongate.