Possibilities in an abductive perspective: Creating affordances as cognitive chances

Abstract

Recent studies on the so-called EEEE (extended, embodied, embedded, and enacted) cognition have demonstrated that the “environmental situatedness” of human cognition and its evolutionary component may be used to better understand cognition in general. This indicates that humans do not keep in their memory ample representations of the surroundings and their variables, but instead, they richly manipulate it by picking up information and resources, when possible and needed, that are already accessible, or that are extracted/created: it is in this perspective that we can conceptualize in a useful and deep way the concept of possibility. Information, resources, cognitive opportunities, and possibilities are actively pursued for and even created: in light of this, we may consider human cognition to be a possibility-seeking mechanism. In particular, new possibilities can be usefully seen as new “affordances”: for example, environmental anchors that enable us to more effectively utilize external resources. Of course, the availability of the proper affordances, which in turn offer cognitive possibilities, is connected to important new found concepts of discoverability and diagnosticability. Abduction is still significant in these cognitive processes because it refers to all those hypothetical inferences made by human and non-human animals that are based on deft manipulations of their surroundings, either to merely “detect” affordances or to “create” manufactured external objects (e.g. artifacts) that in turn provide new affordances and cues and so new cognitive possibilities.

Keywords

Abduction affordance chances eco-cognitive situatedness possibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abe

(2012). Cognitive chance discovery: From abduction to affordance. In Magnani

(Eds.), Philosophy and cognitive science (pp. 155–172). Springer.

Adolphs

(2006). How do we know the minds of others? Domain specificity, simulation, and enactive social cognition. Brain Research, 1079, 25–35.

Barrett

H. C.

Kurzban

(2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113(3), 628–647.

Brunswik

(1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.

Byrne

Kirlik

Fick

C. S.

(2006). Kilograms matter: Rational analysis, ecological rationality, and closed-loop modeling of interactive cognition and behavior. In Kirlik

(Ed.), Human-technology interaction. Methods and models for cognitive engineering and human-computer interaction (pp. 267–286). Oxford University Press.

Degani

Shafto

Kirlik

(2006). What makes vicarious functioning work? Exploring the geometry of human-technology interaction. In Kirlik

(Ed.), Human-technology interaction. Methods and models for cognitive engineering and human-computer interaction (pp. 179–196). Oxford University Press.

Donald

(2001). A mind so rare. The evolution of human consciousness. Norton.

Gaver

W. W.

(1991, April 28–May 2). Technology affordances [Conference session]. CHI’91 conference proceedings, New Orleans, LA (pp. 79–84).

Gibson

J. J.

(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Kirlik

(Ed.). (2006). Human-technology interaction. Methods and models for cognitive engineering and human-computer interaction. Oxford University Press.

11.

Laland

K. N.

Brown

G. R.

(2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 15, 95–104.

12.

Laland

K. N.

Sterelny

(2006). Perspective: Seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 60(9), 4757–4779.

13.

Magnani

(2006). Mimetic minds. Meaning formation through epistemic mediators and external representations. In Loula

Gudwin

Queiroz

(Eds.), Artificial cognition systems (pp. 327–357). Idea Group Publishers.

14.

Magnani

(2009). Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Springer.

15.

Magnani

(2017). The abductive structure of scientific creativity. An essay on the ecology of cognition. Springer.

16.

Magnani

(2022). Discoverability. The urgent need of an ecology of human creativity. Springer.

17.

McGrenere

(2000, May 15–17). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept [Conference session]. Proceedings of graphics interface, Montreal, Quebec (pp. 179–186).

18.

Norman

D. A.

(1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.

19.

Odling-Smee

F. J.

Laland

K. N.

Feldman

M. W.

(2003). Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.

20.

Peirce

C. S.

(1866–1913). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1–6, Hartshorne

Weiss

eds.; Vol. 7–8, Burks

A. W.

, ed. (1931-1958)). Harvard University Press.

21.

Scarantino

(2003). Affordances explained. Philosophy of Science, 70, 949–961.

22.

Warren

W. H.

(1995). Constructing an econiche. In Flach

Hancock

Caird

Vicente

K. J.

(Eds.), Global perspective on the ecology of human-machine systems (pp. 210–237). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

23.

Wells

A. J.

(2002). Gibson’s affordances and Turing’s theory of computation. Ecological Psychology, 14(3), 141–180.

24.

Wheeler

(2004). Is language an ultimate artifact? Language Sciences, 26, 693–715.

25.

Windsor

W. L.

(2004). An ecological approach to semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 34(2), 179–198.