Abstract
Background
This Scoping review (ScR) builds upon the 2017 review conducted by Hansen et al which contributed to evidence base
Methods
Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines we searched across 7 electronic databases for SY or FB research articles from 2017 through 2022. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Embase, JSTOR were included due to the interdisciplinary nature of SY or FB research. Each database provided unique strengths ensuring a capture of a wide range of articles. The resulting articles were screened and extracted through Covidence.
Results
Database searches returned 241 results, with 110 references removed during the deduplication process, 131 were initially screened in the title and abstract review stage. Resulting in 82 unique results deemed relevant and screened in full text. During the final stage of the review, 63 articles met all inclusion criteria and were extracted for data.
Conclusions
The practice of SY has physiological (PHYS) and psychological (PSYCH) benefits across age groups. Research findings indicate either the natural or the virtual environment (VW) has significant health benefits. Continued research is encouraged globally for short- and long-term health outcomes for all individuals. The connection with nature benefits the mind, body and soul and is supported by Henry David Thoreau’s philosophy: “Our livesneed the relief of where the pine flourishes and the jay still scream.”
Keywords
Introduction
Rationale
The rationale for this ScR is primarily driven by the need to identify existing knowledge gaps that have developed in the past 5 years, 1 to clarify concepts, and to investigate new SY research While we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic 2 the rates of PHYS health morbidities 3 rise, suicide and mental health issues escalate, 4 and health promotion becomes even more paramount worldwide. The causes of cardiovascular disease, cancer, obesity, and liver disease are associated with sedentary lifestyles, exposure to carcinogenic agents, and the overuse of alcohol and recreational drugs.5-7 Health promotion programs are needed to mitigate the health care crisis. Research 8 shows SY decreases incidences of PHYS and PSYCH disorders and is an inexpensive health promotion intervention.
The practice of SY, also known as Forest Bathing (FB), is a “traditional Japanese practice of immersing oneself in nature by mindfully using all 5 senses. 8 ” Originally, SY was initiated by the Japanese government in the 1980s to provide a mindfulness practice for individuals who lived in urban or city areas 9 to combat work-related stress. Arisugawa-no-miya memorial park 10 is an example in Tokyo where citizens may immerse themselves in densely forested areas with waterfalls to alleviate work-related stress.
Many PHYS and PSYCH health benefits are highlighted throughout the literature.9,11 The PHYS benefits include improved immune function/cancer prevention, 12 decreased pulse rate and BP, protection of the respiratory system, and decreased stress responses. 11 The PSYCH impacts include an increase in mental relaxation and a decrease in depression, anxiety disorders, grief, isolation 13 and anger.8,9 Furthermore, SY practice may allow one to experience a “higher power 14 ” and lead to understand the spiritual connection 15 with nature through the concepts of awe and wonder.15,16 SY as a therapeutic modality 17 may increase energy and happiness levels, improve sleep quality, reduce the inflammation response, reduce chances of obesity and accelerate surgical recovery time.
Investing time mindfully connecting with nature promotes health and alleviates sub-optimal health states 18 (SHS). A cross-sectional 18 study found a significant relationship between low physical activity and SHS among college freshmen in China. Xu et al 19 conducted a large sample (N = 48,978 Chinese adults) survey study and determined lifestyle behaviors to be improved to ameliorate SHS incidence due to short sleep duration, lack of exercise, unhealthy nutrition, alcohol consumption, smoking tobacco, and irregular mealtimes. The increasing incidence of health care providers prescribing nature-based programs 20 is promising. Many advantages are associated with viewing forests, varied species of trees, mountains, plants, flowers, urban green spaces, rivers, and parks. As Ralph Waldo Emerson (1858) reminds us: “Cities of mortals woe begone, Fantastic care derides, but in the serious landscape lone, Stern benefit abides” (p. 9). 21
Objectives
The objective of this ScR was to identify existing knowledge gaps that have developed in the past 5 years, to clarify concepts, and to investigate new research in SY. The research on this topic has increased over the past 5 years, with primary research continuing to be conducted in Japan and South Korea.
Conceptual Framework
The Forest Therapy Conceptual Model (FTCM), as defined by Gobster et al (2022), is a valuable tool for a ScR building upon the 2017 review by Hansen et al. It provides a comprehensive framework to understand the process of human-forest interaction, therefore enhancing the methodological quality of studies. The model’s global relevance makes it suitable for SY research, because SY involves the interaction of the forest and human individuals. It aids in identifying programmatic components, health information, time spent in nature, geographical regions, and trends in SY. The model also helps identify the specific components of SY that contribute to health outcomes, such as the types of interactions with the forest that are most beneficial. The FTCM (see Figure 1) provides insights into how cultural, geographical, and individual factors influence the practice and outcomes of SY. In conclusion, the Forest Therapy Conceptual Model is highly relevant for a systematic review, providing valuable insights into SY worldwide.
According to Gobster et al (2022),
22
Forest Therapy (FT) is an overarching term encompassing an individual’s mindful connection with nature while using a multi-sensory approach in natural and semi-natural environments to improve physical wellbeing and mental health. Gobster and associates conducted a ScR of the FT research and created a conceptual framework. These FT interactions are demonstrated in this model (see Figure 1) as 4 components: human, forest, interaction, and outcomes. The forest therapy conceptual model
The human factor concerns who is the research participant and how the research sample may engage in or enjoy FT. Gobster et al (2022) 22 include human sub-components, such as socio-demographics, human needs and motivations, target groups and, individual group differences. The forest factor represents the features and qualities of the forest environment that may provide therapeutic effects and positive health outcomes. The framework’s authors include within the forest component landscape/forest types and the forest type differences. Regarding the model’s interaction component, Gobster et al (2022) 22 demonstrate an interest in what kinds of activities individuals participated in and the time spent engaging with nature. The interactions component demonstrates an interest in the social aspects in nature and the size of the groups and whether guided vs unguided engagements significantly differ. The model component, outcomes, includes the aspects.
This ScR included, but was not limited to, components illustrated in the conceptual model by Gobster and co-authors (2022). 22
Materials and Methods
Protocol and Registration
The review protocol does not exist outside of this manuscript for this scoping review.
Search Strategy
This ScR was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines
23
. The review was conducted using 6 databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Embase, JSTOR, CINAHL to identify relevant studies published in English language from 2017 through January 30, 2022. Search keywords were “SY”, OR “FB” OR “FT.” Figure 2 shows our PRISMA-ScR flow chart. Eligibility Criteria for Inclusion and Exclusion PRISMA- ScR flowchart.
This study is a ScR exploring programmatic components, health information monitored and screened, time spent in nature, geographical regions, and trends and themes in SY worldwide. To be eligible for analysis, primary studies needed to (1) report an empirical intervention study, using pre- and post-intervention measures, (2) use SY, FB, FT defined under the concept of (mindfulness; immersion in nature, sensory experience; slow walk; sitting intentional) and a measurement of PSYCH, PHYS, and/or spiritual health or wellbeing, (3) Can include an overnight or residential SY programs, (4) can include Virtual sensory nature immersion, and (5) published in English.
Exclusion criteria were (1) review articles, (2) studies not including humans, (3) case studies or qualitative studies, (4) studies involving horticulture, green prescriptions, green gym, blue therapy, blue gym, brown therapy, wilderness therapy, forest schools, an outdoor hiking or exercise program, or interventions to change the environment because these activities are not based in SY principles.
Article Screening
Article screening was conducted in 3 phases: title and abstract, full-text review and data extraction. All 131 articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion by 2 review team members. Once an article was voted to be included it was moved to the data extraction phase of the review.
Article Extraction
Data Extraction Tool Template.
Risk of Bias
Due to such as lack of resources and expertise a Risk of Bias assessment was not feasible.
Findings
Results
Searching across the 6 bibliographic databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Embase, JSTOR, CINAHL) 241 results were returned. Deduplication in Covidence removed 110 references. A total of 131 research articles were initially screened with first stage resulting in 82 unique research articles screened for full text. After which, 13 articles were not relevant and excluded. During the final review stage, 63 articles met all inclusion criteria and were extracted, with 1 article included as a typographical correction to an already included article.
In-Situ and Virtual Study Characteristics. Studies are Presented Alphabetically by First Author’s Last Name and Then by Country of Study.
Included studies represented varied study designs from Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, longitudinal, and cross sectional. The most common study designs were non-randomized experimental studies (25) and RCTs (20).
aGender was included in the description when the study included a sample of 1 gender type.
The countries with the most included articles were Japan (18), South Korea (17), and China (10). A total of 10 of the research articles included for data extraction involved a virtual environment, with 1 based on a cross-sectional survey design. The method of virtual forest or nature exposure varied across studies with most relying on a computer program or virtual reality and 1 study utilizing auditory stimulation of forest and nature sounds.
Physiological and Psychological Effects
The 63 articles extracted for data, meeting all inclusion criteria, focused on the PHYS and PSYCH effects of SY. Most measured the PHYS effects through circulatory function of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate. PSYCH effects were primarily measured through the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Other measurement tools included the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS), Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) and the Restorative Outcome Scale (ROS).
The PHYS results of SY indicate reduced blood pressure, decreased heart rate, increased relaxation, and decreased stress among the 63 research studies reviewed. Another study 24 found PHYS effects on brain activity and autonomic nervous activity.
The study participants’ PSYCH results from the POMS questionnaire following SY indicate decreased tension-anxiety, depression, anger, and fatigue with an increase in positive emotions and a sense of well-being. Connection to nature was an outcome of interest for a single portion of the included papers. Connection to nature
25
and the time spent in nature may increase participants’ well-being, health status and emotional states Figure 3. Our current review articles have noted the same. A SY experience at Gazzam Lake Nature Preserve, Bainbridge Island, Washington, June 2023. Photo credit Joe Richards.
A synopsis of the studies is alphabetically presented by country.
Australia
Australian research included (1) 26 multi-site longitudinal stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of adults with mental illness. The intervention was a FT session with time of observation (DOS) of 10 weekly 90-minute sessions. Outcomes are still pending. 27
Canada
Canadian research included (1) 28 pre- and post-intervention study of healthy adults who completed a forest walk (FW) observation. The intervention was 120 minutes. There was a significant decrease in negative affect and a significant increase in positive affect. 28
China
The studies (10)28-38 conducted in China included both NR (5) and RCTs (5). Populations included university students, elderly patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), healthy adults and people with hypertension. Interventions varied between a sitting nature observation (SO), a walking nature observation (WO), and a combination of both sitting and walking observations (SAWO). Settings included bamboo forests, coniferous forests, mixed forest, and city/urban settings. Patients with cardiovascular disease were often accompanied by a health care professional. University students were often unaccompanied or provided FT guides. 33 DOS varied between studies including short exposure and elongated exposures: 15min (SO), 30 (SO, WO), 1.5 (SO), 1.5hr (WO), 2hr (SO). Biological measurements included Endothelin-1 (ET-1), activities of renin, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and levels of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress levels and inflammatory measures. They included natural killer (NK) cell activity and perforin, granulysin, and granzymes A/B in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) levels. PHYS measurements included BP, heart rate (HR), diastolic BP (DBP) and oxygen saturation (SpO2). PSYCH measurements explored outcomes around mental health, mood states and subjective vitality. They used PSYCH measurement tools including the ROS and WEMWBS. All authors reported positive effects of FT interventions on biological, physiological and PSYCH parameters. Research includes an expansive evaluation of biological markers. In 1 study, patients with CHF who walked in forests demonstrated decreased ET-1, renin activities, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and reduced levels of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Male university students improved in biological, PHYS measurements, such as increased NK activity, number, perforin, granulysin and granzymes A/B levels; decreased BP, HR, SpO2 and PSYCH results: enhanced positive mood states.
Finland
Finland research included (2)39,40 a cross-over research study and 1 RCT of undergraduate students who participated in a sitting/standing observation of snow-covered forests lasting 15-minute while during the RCT students watched 15-minute (each) forest and urban videos. Researchers reported a significant decrease in negative mood; however, positive vigor did not change. The videos demonstrated a reduction in ‘pessimistic attitude to do work’ among students.
Germany
German research included 1 RCT (1) 41 involving university students who participated in a self-paced forest walk or in a self-paced virtual reality (VR) walk with 360-degree viewing. Researchers reported on PSYCH outcomes and found short virtual forest walks increased well-being similarly to physical forest walks.
Hungary
Hungarian research included a NR study (1) 42 evaluating a forest program in adults. Participants completed intermittent slow walking with 5 rest periods where they had 2 viewpoints for watching scenery. Biological and PHYS results included decreased BP and enhanced immune function.
Italy
Italian research included (2)43,44 NR studies of healthy adults. Interventions varied between independent forest walk (FW), urban walking, hiking group and a nature group. Walks were either self-guided or by guided instructors. Results indicated FT sessions in remote forest areas are effective in improving PSYCH mood states.
Japan
Japanese research included studies (18)24,45,46,46-58 that were NR (9) and RCTs (7) and other pre- and post-study designs (2). Research populations: hypertensive males, employed males, office workers, university students, undergraduates (male/female) and healthy male adults. Interventions varied between SO, WO, walking observation and other sensory (WOAOS), FT, Viewing Landscape (VL), View Landscape Sitting (VLS) and a SY retreat. Settings included forest, urban, city, crowded and thinned forests. Interventions were self-guided or conducted by guides. DOS varied between studies including short exposure and elongated exposures: 15min and 10min (VL), 30 (SO, WO), 1.5 (SO), 1.5hr (WO), 2hr (SO). PHYS measurement included parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), sympathetic nervous system (SNS), HR and BP. PSYCH assessment included comfortability, relaxation, mood, anxiety, self-compassion, and restorative effect. FT interventions on PHYS and PSYCH parameters resulted in positive effects.
Poland
Polish research included (4)59-61 studies that were NR (3) and RCTs (1). Research populations: adults, university students and employees. Interventions varied between FWWAE, FWWSD and WO. Interventions were carried out in the forest and were self-guided, however, adults with affective and psychotic disorders were supervised by qualified therapists. DOS varied between studies including short- and extended-exposures: 20 min (WO), 15 min (FWWSD) and 1hr 45 min (FWWAE). PHYS measurement included stress while PSYCH measurements included POM subscales, depression/dejection, confusion, fatigue, anger, and hostility. Authors reported positive effects of FT interventions on PHYS and PSYCH parameters. Polish researchers have an expansive evaluation of PSYCH markers not found in other reported studies. Adults with affective and psychotic disorders who were exposed to FWWAE and accompanied by therapists showed positive effects on the POMS subscales, decreased anxiety, but fatigue had no significant change. University students exposed to 15-minute of FT showed improved PHYS stress and lowered negative PSYCH markers. Comparatively, university students exposed to 1hr and 45 minutes of FWWAE had a positive effect on the POMS subscales, however, there was no change in anger or hostility. The DOS did not influence outcomes whether participants had a 15-minute walk with sensory direction or a 1 hour 45-minute FWWAE.
Singapore
Singapore research included (1) 62 a study on university students and community members evaluating forest (garden) walks. Outcomes included HR and mood states. Researchers reported improved nature connectedness (not reported in other studies), mood state and HR regardless of whether the walk was guided or not.
South Korea
South Korean research included (14)63-79 studies that were NR (6 and RCTs (3) and other trials (5). Populations cited: stroke survivor, female, adult, elementary school aged, cancer patients, siblings of disabled children, elderly, university students, postmenopausal insomnia, juvenile offenders. Interventions varied between walking only, walking while engaging 5 senses, art therapy in forest, FW, and wood working, breathing program, voluntary forest activities, band gymnastics, physio-cognitive play, cool down exercise, seon yoga, serotonin walking, healing touch, urban group, Qigong, forest dance, forest meditation and walking meditation. Settings included various forest locations. Interventions were self-guided or guided. DOS varied between studies including short- and extended -exposures. Biological measurements included serotonin, insulin, oxidative stress, sleep quality and resistance to disease. PHYS measurements included neurophysiology, bioimpedance, serotonin, electroencephalogram, heart rate variability (HRV) and bioimpedance. While PSYCH measurements included positive well-being, depressive mood, anxiety, self-esteem, alleviated stress, emotional state, stress response, happiness levels, well-being, mental balance, social involvement, sociability, and self-control. All reported positive effects of FT interventions on biological, PHYS and PSYCH parameters. South Korean researchers included several contemplative practices in their forest programs including FW, WO, warm-up exercises, Qigong, band gymnastics, physio-cognitive play, cool down exercises, lying down meditation, seon yoga, serotonin walking, healing touch, stress-relief, and natural-meditation. South Korean researchers were the only group to evaluate the influence of forest cognition in older adults. Outcomes were positive regardless of the intervention setting, type (traditional forest therapy or mixed with contemplative practices), administration (self- or guided), and length (10 minutes or 6 weeks).
Patients with cancer who completed a FW intervention reported improved sleep quality. Non-disabled siblings of children with disabilities experienced positive effects on brain waves and elderly participants who completed a forest breathing program had improved neurophysiology, improved HRV and improved bioimpedance. University students showed a significant improvement in PSYCH effects. Moreover, juvenile offenders reported improvement in PSYCH well-being, self-esteem, mental balance, social involvement, sociability, self-control, and happiness. The type and time of exposure did not appear to matter as results were positive whether participants had a 15-minute 3 times per-week for 4 weeks or a 2-hour session.
Spain
Spanish research included (3)80-82 studies included NR (1) or RCTs (2). Populations cited: university students and adults with fibromyalgia. Interventions varied between WO and non-specified exposure. Interventions were carried out in forests and were self-guided. DOS varied between studies including a 2-hour WO and unspecified exposure. Biological measurements included alpha-pinene, monoterpene, cortisol, stress biomarkers and core symptoms. While PHYS measurements reported on core symptoms. All authors reported positive effects of FT interventions on biological and PHYS parameters. Spanish researchers have an expansive evaluation of biological markers not found in other reported studies. Female university students completing a walking program in an oak forest and urban setting showed increased absorption of alpha-pinene in the forest with lower baseline monoterpene blood concentrations. Time spent in the forest may be an important factor when considering stress biomarkers. While forest programs showed more benefits vs urban programs, the DOS did not appear to matter as results were positive whether participants did a 2-hour walking only program or otherwise.
Taiwan
Taiwanese research included (3)83-85 studies that were NR (2) or RCTs (1). Populations cited: healthy adults and survivors of chronic disease. Interventions varied between WO, exercise programs, and FB. Settings included forests, Phyllostachys edulis (forest) and urban settings. Interventions were guided and self-guided. DOS varied between studies including short- and extended-exposures: 2-hour FB, 6 days, and 5 nights WO. Researchers explored PHYS samples including SBP and DBP, SNS activity, HR, and pulse. PSYCH measurements included mood states. Results were positive whether participants had a 2-hour or a 6-day 5-night SY program. Phyllostachys edulis forests showed benefits in participants’ cardiovascular functions following a walking exercise program. Healthy adults exhibited a decrease in SBP and increase in SNS activity. 85 The self-guided group exhibited an increase in HR values and decreases in SBP and DBP. The 3 FT programs had positive effects on improving mood states. 85
Tsao (2022) 83 conducted a 6-day/5-night FW exercise program (1.5 hr. in a Phyllostachys edulis) compared to an urban park in Taipei city. The FW program results indicate an increase in cardiovascular function. Yu (2017) 84 investigated a 2-hour FB program to stimulate the senses in healthy adults and survivors of chronic disease. Results showed a decrease in pulse rate and SBP and DBP in the participants.
United Kingdom (UK)
British research included (1) 27 a mixed-methods study of students and adults. This study population received either a walking or video setting only intervention. Settings included a SY or a SY video setting with 4-hour exposure times. Researchers explored PSYCH responses and reported SY reduces stress and increases positive affect and well-being more than the digital SY.
Discussion
The evidence suggests, from a PHYS perspective, blood pressure and heart rate decreased in participants of SY along with increased relaxation for each of the empirical studies. Psychologically, participants reported a decrease in anxiety along with an improved state of well-being. Gender, culture, education, marital status, economic status, nor age had an impact on the outcomes for each of the studies. The time the participants engaged in the SY activities ranged from 15 minutes to 90 minutes. Based on the studies reviewed, the findings provided evidence, SY may be of benefitPHYS and PSYCH even if exposure is as little as 15 minutes.
Summary of Findings
This ScR expands on the 2017 review by Hansen and colleagues, which looked at program elements, health data tracked and screened, time spent outdoors, geographical areas, and ScR trends and themes. A total of 63 studies (21 randomized, 29 non-randomized, and 13 other), with 4359 participants, met all the criteria for a detailed review and evaluation. Although some studies showed strong design and reporting, the findings are moderated by several shortcomings related to study design and outcomes. As a result, we highlight several areas for ongoing research and enhancement in this discussion.
Limitations
There are limitations of this study. First, many primary studies had moderate to high bias in participants and researchers are aware of the interventions. Blinded SY interventions are practically impossible to apply. Additionally, self-reported questionnaires for PSYCH reported outcomes can lead to errors, weakening the link between SY and intended outcomes. Future studies could include well-designed interventions and reliable psychological measures to explore SY effects.
Second, although SY may include a spiritual component, 86 none of the authors included spiritual metrics in the research designs. However, meditation was included as an independent variable of multiple studies. Qualitative papers were excluded in this review and perhaps spiritual measures were not found due to this exclusion.
Third, these studies were carried out internationally. Therefore, awareness of this fact in interpreting the results is suggested, and the need for broader geographic application, including the United States (US), is emphasized in SY review effects. Fourth, this ScR may have missed unpublished or non-English studies as only English studies from the past 5 years were reviewed. Literature searches using international databases were not conducted, however, it appears our method identified many for this ScR. This ScR’s conceptualization was based on Hansen et al (2017) State-of-the-Art review. There is background information regarding the practice of SY in the US, however, the authors did not find research conducted in the US during the 2017 to 2022 time period. Hence, a renewed call for empirical research in the US is evidenced by the results of this paper.
Fifth, the chosen studies lacked follow-up evaluations, potentially affecting effectiveness of reported outcomes. It’s uncertain if SYs impact persists over time. Hence, future research could include follow-ups to assess long-term effects on PHYS and PSYCH health. In addition, a spiritual connection may be a researched outcome in the future.
Despite its limitations, this study highlights SYs therapeutic benefits. Its use as a non-pharmacologic method to manage and treat PHYS and PSYCH health conditions are advocated for while aligning with the increasing endorsement of nature-based therapeutic activities for maintaining physical and mental health.
Conclusion
The evidence from this review of 63 papers support the practice of SY as a health promotion modality. Compelling data suggests even brief exposures to SY are beneficial. The 63 studies conclude SY, is a powerful modality for improving both PHYS and PSYCH health and well-being. Whether spending a few minutes or a few days, whether in the heart of the forest or experiencing it virtually, SY has been shown to alleviate negative mental and physiological health symptoms.
While these findings are promising, the potential for bias in these studies are acknowledged. Furthermore, there are aspects of well-being, such as our connection to nature as a spiritual component, that have yet to be fully explored in SY research. The exact mechanisms and underlying processes through which SY works remain the subject of ongoing investigation.
An evaluation of SY’s long-term efficacy in comparison to other established therapeutic contemplative approaches is necessary before SY can enter mainstream treatment modalities. While the potential is promising, we acknowledge there is still a significant amount of research to be conducted. However, with each progressive study, there is an advancement towards a profound understanding of the therapeutic index intrinsic to SY.
Humans intuitively know the innate PHYS, PSYCH and spiritual benefits 87 associated with being in nature due to our long history (99.9% time) living in/with and as a part of nature. Today, as evidenced by this review, health care providers, scientists, psychologists, and environmental advocates worldwide are unveiling the remarkable holistic-health benefits associated with SY. This review of 63 studies and supporting background information demonstrates the heightened interest in SY worldwide. The practice of slowly moving through nature in an awareness/awakened/mindful state profound effects on the PHYS and PSYCH systems. Nature connects us with our spirituality through such concepts as awe, wonder and gratitude. This ScR has illuminated the health-promotion benefits of spending time in nature and added to the evidence-based literature. Let us continue to research, reflect, promote and document, as well as learn from the experiences associated with SY. As Santosa and colleagues (2022) mention: Nature reminds us to rest when tired, enjoy every breath, and be grateful for everything that happens (p.1165). 88
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
In great appreciation for Sara Warber, MD and Reo Jones, PhD Candidate, MSN, RN for their early contributions to this review.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.H., A.K., A.L.V., H.H.R.; methodology, M.H., A.K., A.L.V., H.H.R.; formal analysis, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K., M.H.; writing—review and editing, A.K., M.H., A.L.V., H.H.R., J.G.P., C.P.; supervision, M.H., H.H.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
