Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose

Evidence on the relationship between credit and firm growth among micro, small, and medium enterprises relies heavily on the microfinance literature, which finds that credit has only modest impacts on business performance. Our study investigates the impact of meso-credit: larger capital infusions with longer maturities to women entrepreneurs in Ethiopia. We study the impact of individual-liability loans with an average size of USD12,000, or eight times larger than the typical microfinance group-lending offering.

Study design

We leverage panel survey data collected from nearly 2000 firms in three post-loan intervention time periods over five years. We employ difference-in-differences and propensity score matching methods to estimate the impact of the loans to women-owned, formal enterprises, relative to a comparison group not offered loans.

Findings

Our results suggest that large, individual-liability loans have a significant positive impact on firm growth, with gains of 30% in business income and 50% in employment for firms that borrow, relative to those that do not. Loans also increase the likelihood of survival of existing firms. These effects are not merely driven by positive selection during the loan appraisal process; we find that loans matter even after accounting for borrower characteristics.

Contributions

Our paper is one of the first to evaluate the effect of loans to women in the “missing middle” and serves as a proof of concept that larger capital infusions for firms can promote growth.

Implications

Policymakers that seek to support the growth of firms should consider redesigning loan products to target underserved market segments, with larger and better-fit credit.

Keywords

entrepreneurship firms finance credit gender impact evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Imbens

G. W.

(2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta11293

Agier

Szafarz

(2013). Microfinance and gender: Is there a glass ceiling on loan size? World Development, 42(6), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.016

Aragón

F. M.

Karaivanov

Krishnaswamy

(2020). Credit lines in microcredit: Short-term evidence from a randomized controlled trial in India. Journal of Development Economics, 146, Article 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102497

Aterido

Beck

Iacovone

(2011). Gender and finance in sub-saharan Africa: Are women disadvantaged? Policy research working paper series 5571. The World Bank.

Augsburg

De Haas

Harmgart

Meghir

(2015). The impacts of microcredit: Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130272

Banerjee

Duflo

Glennerster

Kinnan

(2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 22–53. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130533

Bernhardt

Field

Pande

Rigol

(2019). Household matters: Revisiting the returns to capital among female microentrepreneurs. The American Economic Review: Insights, 1(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180444

Bryan

Karlan

Osman

(2024). Big loans to small businesses: Predicting winners and losers in an entrepreneurial lending experiment. The American Economic Review, 114(9), 2825–2860. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220616

Buvinic

Gokhroo

(2023). Women and credit: A narrative review in low- and middle-income countries. Center for Global Development (CGD).

10.

Buvinic

O’Donnell

(2016). Revisiting what works: Women, economic empowerment and smart design. Center for Global Development.

11.

Cai

Meki

Quinn

(2021). Microfinance. VoxDevLit. https://voxdev.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/Microfinance_Issue_2.pdf

12.

Cai

Meki

Quinn

(2023). Microfinance issue 2. VoxDevLit. https://voxdev.org/voxdevlit/microfinance

13.

Cull

Morduch

(2017). Microfinance and economic development. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8252.

14.

Dahal

Fiala

(2020). What do we know about the impact of microfinance? The problems of statistical power and precision. World Development, 128(C), Article 104773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104773

15.

Dehejia

Wahba

(2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982

16.

De Mel

McKenzie

Woodruff

(2009). Are women more credit constrained? Experimental evidence on gender and microenterprise returns. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.3.1

17.

Demirguc-Kunt

Klapper

Singer

Van Oudheusden

(2014). The global findex database 2014: Measuring financial inclusion around the world (p. 7255). World Bank Policy Research working paper.

18.

Fiala

(2018). Returns to microcredit, cash grants and training for male and female microentrepreneurs in Uganda. World Development, 105, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.027

19.

Field

Pande

Rigol

(2013). Does the classic microfinance model discourage entrepreneurship among the poor? Experimental evidence from India. The American Economic Review, 103(6), 2196–2226. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2196

20.

Gichuki

Mutuku

Kinuthia

(2014). Performance of women owned enterprises accessing credit from village credit and savings associations in Kenya. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-014-0016-1

21.

Hussam

Rigol

Roth

B. N.

(2022). Targeting high ability entrepreneurs using community information: Mechanism design in the field. The American Economic Review, 112(3), 861–898. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200751

22.

Imbens

G. W.

Rubin

D. B.

(2015). Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

23.

Karlan

Zinman

(2011). Microcredit in theory and practice: Using randomized credit scoring for impact evaluation. Science, 332(6035), 1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200138

24.

Kersten

Harms

Liket

Maas

(2017). Small firms, large impact? A systematic review of the sme finance literature. World Development, 97(5), 2196–2226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.012

25.

McKenzie

(2012). Beyond baseline and follow-up: The case for more t in experiments. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.01.002

26.

McKenzie

D. J.

(2024). Is there still a role for direct government support to firms in developing countries? New Zealand Economic Papers, 59(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2023.2290484

27.

McKenzie

Paffhausen

A. L.

(2019). Small firm death in developing countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(4), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00798

28.

Meager

(2019). Understanding the average impact of microcredit expansions: A bayesian hierarchical analysis of seven randomized experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(1), 57–91. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170299

29.

Morsy

(2020). Access to finance–mind the gender gap. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 78, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.02.005

30.

Penrose

E. T.

(1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press.

31.

Pomeranz

D. D.

(2014). The promise of microfinance and women’s empowerment: What does the evidence say? EY Thought Leadership Series. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=47159

32.

Rosenbaum

Rubin

(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942

33.

Tarozzi

Desai

Johnson

(2015). The impacts of microcredit: Evidence from Ethiopia. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 54–89. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130475

34.

J-PAL.

(2023). Microcredit: Impacts and promising innovations. Technical report, J-PAL Policy Insights. https://www.povertyactionlab.org/policy-insight/microcredit-impacts-and-promising-innovations

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB

Better Loans or Better Borrowers? Lifting Credit Constraints for Women-Owned Firms in Ethiopia

Abstract

Purpose

Study design

Findings

Contributions

Implications

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material