Drawing from Small’s notion of musicking, I invite readers to recognize the transformative power of community music programs in fostering societal cohesion and personal growth. Central to this discussion is the idea that musicking extends beyond mere musical performance to encapsulate a complex network of relationships among participants, which reflects broader societal interactions as envisaged by those involved. I propose the cyclic nature of building and rebuilding within community music programs and advocate for continuous reflection on the fundamental question: “What is music for?” This paper aims to deepen our understanding of music’s role within our communities.
EtzioniA. (1995). Rights and the common good: The communitarian perspective. St. Martin’s Press.
2.
EtzioniA. (1998). The essential communitarian reader. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
3.
KoopmanC. (2007). Community music as music education: On the educational potential of community music. International Journal of Music Education, 25(2), 151–163.
4.
OnyxJ.BullenP. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 23–42. doi:10.1177/0021886300361002
5.
PartingtonK. (2005). What do we mean by our community?Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(3), 241–251.
6.
SmallC. (1999). Musicking—The meanings of performing and listening. A lecture. Music Education Research, 1(1), 9–22.
7.
WoodwardS. C. (2017). Social justice and popular music education: Building a generation of artists impacting social change. In SmithG.MoirZ.BrennanM.RambarranS.KirkmanP. (Eds.), The Routledge research companion to popular music education (pp. 395–411). Routledge.
