The escalating costs that are associated with earning an undergraduate degree often force students to make difficult choices regarding whether they can afford the financial costs to remain in school. Our students encounter many economic challenges and hardships as they attempted to earn a degree. We believe that required textbook costs for courses should not hinder student learning or be the obstacle that prevents students from completing their courses and graduating. For many students, textbook affordability is a pressing retention need. If the choice that students need to make is deciding on whether they can afford to pay the rent, purchase food for the month, or buy a textbook, the probability of investing in a textbook is slim at best. Within the context of this paper, we discuss the challenges and opportunities that emerge in the California State University system, when moving from traditional high-priced textbooks to low or no cost Open Educational Resources for university course offerings that can reduce the financial burden on students and potentially increase retention to graduation rates.
BlissTRobinsonTJHiltonJ, et al. (2013) An OER COUP: college teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education2013(1): 4. doi: 10.5334/2013-04. Available at: https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2013-04/.
3.
BrandleSKatzSHaysA, et al. (2019) But what do the students think: results of the CUNY cross-campus zero-textbook cost student survey. Open Praxis11(1): 85–101. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.932. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213655.pdf.
ColvardNBWatsonCEParkH (2018) The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education30(2): 262–276. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184998.
6.
CorreaE (2013) Preparing faculty for online teaching in higher education. In: KesnerR (ed). The Online University: Building Viable Asynchronous Learning Experiences. Champaign Illinois, USA: Common Grounds Publishing E-Learning & Innovative Pedagogies book series, 127–147.
7.
CuttlerC (2019) Students’ Use and Perceptions of the Relevance and quality of open textbooks compared to traditional textbooks in online and traditional classroom environments. Psychology Learning & Teaching18(1): 65–83. DOI: 10.1177/1475725718811300. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1475725718811300.
DelimontNTurtleEBennettA, et al. (2016) University students and faculty have positive perceptions of open/alternative resources and their utilization in a textbook replacement initiative. Research in LearningTechnology24: 29920. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v24.29920. Available at: https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/1754.
10.
FarrowRPittRde los ArcosB, et al. (2015) Impact of OER use on teaching and learning: data from OER research hub (2013-2014). British Journal of Educational Technology46(5): 972–976. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12310.
11.
FeldsteinAMartinMHudsonA, et al. (2012) Open Textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open, Distance And E-Learning2: n2.
12.
FischerLHiltonJRobinsonT, et al. (2015) A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing In Higher Education27(3): 159–172. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32269452/.
13.
GreenKC (2018) Campus Computing 2018: The 29th National Survey of Computing and Information Technology in American Higher Education. Encino, CA: Campus Computing.
HiltonJLRobinsonTJWileyD, et al. (2014) Cost-savings achieved in two semesters through the adoption of open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning15(2): 1700. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1700. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1030100.
MansourEMupingaBDavisonM (2007) Students’ positive and negative experiences in Hybrid and online classes. College Student Journal41(1)–248. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ765422.
PetridesLJimesCMiddleton-DetznerC, et al. (2011) Open textbook adoption and use: implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning26(1): 39–49. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2011.538563. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ911500.
20.
ReidACorreaE (2021) Keep Me Connected! No Cost Solutions for Access to Remote Instruction. In: Kyei-BlanksonL.BlanksonJ.NtuliE. (eds). Handbook of Research on Inequities in Online Education During Global Crises. IGI Global.
21.
ReidAJCorreaEHurJ, et al. (2001) Teaching without PANTS! (Pandemic, Accelerated, Novel, Technology, Symptoms): How affordable learning solutions enabled rapid response instruction. In: FayedI.CummingsJ. (eds). Teaching in the post COVID-19 era. Springer.
SeamanJESeamanJ (2017) Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2017 (Report). Boston, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582411.pdf.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2019) Digest of Education Statistics, 2017. Retrieved July 30, 2020, from Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76.
31.
WatsonCEDomiziDClouserS (2017) Student and faculty perceptions of openstax in high enrollment courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning18(5): 287–304.
