“I Was Treated Differently”: Reproductive Health Care Experiences Among Women With Recent Experiences of Incarceration,Homelessness,And/Or Substance Use in a Medically Underserved Area in the Southwestern US
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2025
“I Was Treated Differently”: Reproductive Health Care Experiences Among Women With Recent Experiences of Incarceration,Homelessness,And/Or Substance Use in a Medically Underserved Area in the Southwestern US
Background: Women with upstream social determinants of health, particularly those with recent experiences of incarceration, homelessness, and/or substance use, encounter a series of barriers in accessing health care services and consequently face poor sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Driven by a community concern for increasing rates of syphilis and congenital syphilis among women who are structurally disadvantaged, this study focuses on their experiences with reproductive healthcare access across healthcare settings.
Research Design and Study Sample: This community-based pláticas (conversational) research project gathered 12 in-depth interviews and testimonios (testimonies) with women who reported a criminalized upstream barrier (incarceration, homelessness, and/or substance use) in a small city in the southwestern U.S. – most of whom identified as Latina/Hispanic.
Analysis and Results: Using a grounded analysis and drawing upon Chicana feminist methodologies, this study identifies four major themes: (1) homelessness and economic vulnerabilities, (2) incarceration and health care, (3) drug use, provider stigma, and motherhood, and (4) desired changes to the healthcare experience.
Conclusion: Results highlight the need for economic and transportation supports, community-based preventive services as alternatives to incarcerated healthcare, along with more compassionate and structurally competent provider-patient dialogue.
HarveyM. How do we explain the social, political, and economic determinants of health? A call for the inclusion of social theories of health inequalities within U.S.-Based public health pedagogy. Pedagogy in Health Promotion2020; 6(4): 246–252.
2.
McKinlayJB. A case for refocusing upstream: the political economy of illness. Interdisciplinary Association for Population Health Science2019; 1: 1–10.
3.
SeligmanHKHamadR. Moving upstream: the importance of examining policies to address health disparities. JAMA Pediatr2021; 175(6): 563–564.
4.
BravemanPEgerterSWilliamsDR. The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annu Rev Publ Health2011; 32: 381–398.
5.
BinswangerIARedmondNSteinerJF, et al.Health disparities and the criminal justice system: an agenda for further research and action. J Urban Health2012; 89(1): 98–107.
6.
BuiJWendtMBakosA. Understanding and addressing health disparities and health needs of justice-involved populations. Publ Health Rep2019; 134(1_suppl): 3S–7S.
7.
LambdinBHComfortMKralAH, et al.Accumulation of jail incarceration and hardship, health status, and unmet health care need among women who use drugs. Wom Health Issues2018; 28(5): 470–475.
8.
GustafsonK. The criminalization of poverty. J Crim Law Criminol2009; 99(3): 643–716.
9.
DavisA. Deeping the debate over mass incarceration. Social Democr2014; 28(3): 15–23.
10.
CohenAVakhariaSPNetherlandJ, et al.How the war on drugs impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system. 2022. Ann Med; 54(1): 2024–2038.
11.
GolembeskiCASufrinCBWilliamsB, et al.Improving health equity for women involved in the criminal legal system. Wom Health Issues2020; 30(5): 313–319.
12.
SufrinC. Jailcare: finding the safety net for women behind bars. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2017.
13.
KnittelAKLorvickJ. Self-reported sexually-transmitted infections and criminal justice involvement among women who use drugs. Addictive Behaviors Reports2019; 10: 100219. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806366/
14.
KarlssonMEZielinskiMJ. Sexual victimization and mental illness prevalence rates among incarcerated women: a literature review. Trauma Violence Abuse2020; 21(2): 326–349. DOI: 10.1177/1524838018767933.
15.
FazelSYoonIAHayesAJ. Substance use disorders in prisoners: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis in recently incarcerated men and women. Addiction2017; 112(10): 1725–1739. DOI: 10.1111/add.13877.
16.
WilliamsSPBryantKL. Sexually transmitted infection prevalence among homeless adults in the United States: a systematic literature review. Sex Transm Dis2018; 45(7): 10.1097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367672/
17.
DiTostoJDHolderKSoyemiE, et al.Housing instability and adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;3(6), 100477. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100477.
18.
KnittelAKRudolphJEShook-SaBE, et al.Self-reported sexually transmitted infections after incarceration in women with or at risk for HIV in the United States, 2007-2017. Journal of Women’s Health, 2022.
19.
NowotnyKMOmoriMMcKennaM, et al.Incarceration rates and incidence of sexually transmitted infections in U.S. Counties, 2011-2016. Am J Publ Health2020; 110(S1): S130–S136.
20.
LeichliterJSDittusPJCopenCE, et al.Trends in factors indicating increased risk for STI among key subpopulations in the United States, 2002-2015. Sex Transm Infect2020; 96(2): 121–123.
21.
RabuyBKopfD. Prisons of poverty: uncovering the pre-incarceration incomes of the imprisoned. Prison Policy Initiative, 2015.
22.
Miller-LloydLLandryJMacmaduA, et al.Barriers to healthcare for people who inject drugs: a survey at a syringe exchange program. Subst Use Misuse2020; 55(6): 896–899.
SeredSNorton-HawkM. Criminalized women and the health care system: the case for continuity of services. J Correct Health Care2013; 19(3): 164–177. DOI: 10.1177/1078345813486323.
26.
NorrisWKAllisonMKFradleyMF, et al.You’re setting a lot of people up for failure’: what formerly incarcerated women would tell healthcare decision makers. Health and Justice2022; 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35103865/
27.
HayesMO. The life pattern of incarcerated women: the complex and interwoven lives of trauma, mental illness, and substance abuse. J Forensic Nurs2015; 11(4): 214–222.
28.
StantonAERoseSJ. The mental health of mothers currently and formerly incarcerated in jails and prisons: an integrative review on mental health, mental health treatment, and traumatic experiences. J Forensic Nurs2020; 16(4): 224–231.
29.
RosenthalLLobelM. Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of Black and Latina women. Ethn Health2020; 25(3): 367–392.
30.
LewisTTCogburnCDWilliamsDR. Self-reported experiences of discrimination and health: scientific advances, ongoing controversies, and emerging issues. Annu Rev Clin Psychol2015; 11: 407–440.
31.
RobertsD. Killing the Black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books; 1999.
32.
AbdouCMFingerhutAW. Stereotype threat among Black and White women in health care settings. Cult Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol2014; 20: 316–323.
McDonaldRO’CallaghanKTorroneE, et al.Vital signs: missed opportunities for preventing congenital syphilis – United States, 2022. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2023; 72(46): 1269–1274.
35.
Scott-SheldonLAJChanPA. Increasing sexually transmitted infections in the U.S.: a call for action for research, clinical, and public health practice. Arch Sex Behav2020; 49(1): 13–17.
36.
HackettCFrankLHeldt-WerleL, et al.Provider-reported barriers in sexual health care services for women with upstream barriers: the case of syphilis and congenital syphilis in southern Colorado, 2022. Sex Transm Dis2024; 51(5): 337–341.
37.
KimballATorroneEMieleK, et al.Missed opportunities for prevention of congenital syphilis – United States, 2018. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, vol 69, pp. 661–665.
38.
Prevention & Field Services Program. Congenital syphilis in Colorado: 2020 case reviews presentation, 2021. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (Accessed 10 November 2022).
HPSA Find [database online]. North bethesda, MD: health resources & service administration (HRSA). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2023. https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/shortage-area/hpsa-find (Accessed June 2024).
42.
Tuhiwai SmithL. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.
43.
Flores CarmonaJHamzehMDelgado BernalD, et al.Theorizing knowledge with pláticas: moving toward transformative qualitative inquiries. Qual Inq; 27(10): 1213–1220.
44.
HamptonLMendozaAS. Chicana/Latina feminista plática methodology as a praxis of solidarity for Black women and women of color contingent faculty at a predominantly white institution (PWI). Int J Qual Stud Educ2023; 36(9): 1769–1780.
45.
GlaserBStraussA. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York City, NY: Routledge, 2017.
46.
MoralesSItzé FloresAGaxiola SerronaTJ, et al.Feminist pláticas as a methodological disruption: drawing upon embodied knowledge, vulnerability, healing, and resistance. Int J Qual Stud Educ2023; 36(1): 1–13.
47.
FierrosCODelgado BernalD. Vamos a pláticar: the contours of pláticas as chicana/latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies2016; 15(2): 98–121.
48.
Flores CarmonaJHamzehMBejaranoC, et al.Pláticas-testimonios: practicing methodological borderlands for solidarity and resilience in academia. Chicana/Latina Studies2018; 18(1): 30–52.
49.
CervantesA. Testimonios. In: Comas-DiázLTorres RiveraE (eds). Liberation Psychology: Theory, Method, Practice, and Social Justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2020, pp. 133–147.
50.
RitchieJZwiABBlignaultI, et al.Insider-outsider positions in health-development research: reflections for practice. Dev Pract2009; 19(1): 106–112.
51.
PitmanGE. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
52.
NewburyJHoskinsM. Relational inquiry: generating new knowledge with adolescent girls who use crystal meth. Qual Inq2010; 16: 642–650.
53.
RosettoKR. Qualitative research interviews: assessing the therapeutic value and challenges. J Soc Pers Relat2014; 31(4): 482–489.
54.
GhisoMPCampanoGThakurtaA, et al.Community-based research with immigrant families: sustaining an intellectual commons of care, resistance, and solidarity in an Urban intensive context. Urban Educ2022; 59(2): 494–519.
55.
ClandininDJConnellyFM. Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
56.
RiessmanCK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.
StraussALGlaserB. The discovery of grounded theory. London, UK: Transaction Publishers, 1967.
59.
CharmazK. The search for meanings – grounded theory. In: SmithJAHarréRVan LangenhoveL (eds). Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London, UK: Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 27–49.
60.
WeberAMiskleBLynchA, et al.Substance use in pregnancy: identifying stigma and improving care. Subst Abuse Rehabil2021; 12: 105–121.
61.
ThorndikeALYetmanHEThorndikeAN, et al.Unmet health needs and barriers to health care among people experiencing homelessness in san francisco’s mission district: a qualitative study. BMC Publ Health2022; 22: 1071.
62.
WallaceRHughes-CromwickPMullH, et al.Access to health care and nonemergency medical transportation. Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 76–84. No. 1924, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.Transport Res Rec: J Transport Res Board.
63.
BravermanPMarchiKEgerterS, et al.Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: the importance of prepregnancy factors. Obstet Gynecol2000; 95: 874–880.Neuhaus.
64.
ShekellePGBegashawMMMiake-LyeIM, et al.Effect of interventions for non-emergent medical transportation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Publ Health2022; 22(799): 1–12.
65.
BinswangerIANowelsCCorsiKF, et al.‘From the prison door right to the sidewalk, everything went downhill,’ A qualitative study of the health experiences of recently released inmates. Int J Law Psychiatr; 34(4): 249–255.
66.
Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. Mandated report on non-emergency medical transportation. In: Report to congress on Medicaid and CHIP, MACPAC. 2021, pp. 153–197. Chapter 5.
67.
WennerstromASugarmanMMartinD, et al.‘You have to be almost dead before they ever really work on you in prison’: a qualitative study of formerly incarcerated women’s health care experiences during incarceration in Louisiana, US. Health Soc Care Community; 30: 1763–1774.
68.
GulaidAMcCoyEF. Reproductive health care in carceral facilities: identifying what we know and opportunities for further research. the Urban Institute, 2022. Report by.
69.
American Public Health Association. Advancing public health interventions to address the harms of the carceral system, 2021. Policy Number 202117.
70.
PrinsSJStoryB. Connecting the dots between mass incarceration, health inequity, and climate change. Am J Publ Health2020; 110(suppl1): S35–36.
71.
WangEALinHAminawungJA, et al.Propensity-matched study of enhanced primary care on contact with the criminal justice system among individuals recently released from prison to new haven. BMJ Open2019; 9.
72.
MehraRBoydLMMagriplesU, et al.Black pregnant women ‘get the most judgment’: a qualitative study of the experiences of Black women at the intersection of race, gender, and pregnancy. Wom Health Issues2020; 30(6): 484–492.
73.
RamosIFCamposBSchetterD. Pregnancy anxiety and beliefs surrounding motherhood in latinas: a qualitative study. Journal of Latinx Psychology2022; 10(4): 277–290.
74.
TuranJMElafrosMALogieCH, et al.Challenges and opportunities in examining and addressing intersectional stigma and health. BMC Med2019; 17(7): 1–15.
75.
MuncanBWaltersSMEzellJ, et al.‘They look at us like junkies’: influences of drug use stigma on the healthcare engagement of people who inject drugs in New York city. Harm Reduct J2020; 17(1): 53.
76.
Kennedy-HendricksAMcGintyEESummersA. Effect of exposure to visual campaigns and narrative vignettes on addiction stigma among health care professionals: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5(2).
77.
MetzlJMHansenH. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med2014; 103: 126–133.
78.
BelasenABelasenAT. Doctor-patient communication: a review and a rationale for using an assessment framework. J Health Organisat Manag2018; 32(7): 891–907.
79.
MuncanBWaltersJOmpadDC. ‘They look at us like junkies’: Influences of drug use stigma on the healthcare engagement of people who inject drugs in New York City. Harm Reduction Journal2020; 17(1): 53.
80.
Kennedy-HendricksAMcGintyESummersA. Effect of exposure to visual campaigns and narrative vignettes on addiction stigma among health care professionals: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open2022; 5(2).
81.
MetzlJMHansenH. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Social Science & Medicine2014; 103: 126–133.
82.
BelasenABelasenAT. Doctor-patient communication: a review and a rationale for using an assessment framework. Journal of Health Organization and Management2018; 32(7): 891–907.
