The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming craniofacial surgery by significantly enhancing clinical and administrative workflows. AI-driven technologies improve diagnostic accuracy through rapid screening and classification of craniofacial anomalies while achieving excellent diagnostic precision rates. Integration of AI with 3D imaging, digital scanning, and printing facilitates personalized surgical planning, streamlines procedures, and increases clinical accuracy. Platforms are now able to automate intraoperative documentation, effectively reducing manual errors and operational inefficiencies. Despite regulatory and ethical challenges, craniofacial surgery is particularly poised to lead AI adoption due to its intricate procedures and extensive use of implants. Strategic integration of AI promotes operational productivity, improves patient outcomes, and sets new industry standards. Embracing AI represents a substantial advancement, reshaping the future landscape of craniofacial surgery.
LiYChengJMeiHMaHChenZLiY.CLPNet: cleft lip and palate surgery support with deep learning. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019;2019:3666-3672. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857799
3.
PatcasRTimofteRVolokitinA, et alFacial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(4):428-433. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjz007
4.
KimSMYangJSHanJWKooHIRohTHYoonSH.Convolutional neural network-based classification of craniosynostosis and suture lines from multi-view cranial X-rays. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):26729. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77550-z
5.
MendozaCSSafdarNOkadaKMyersERogersGFLinguraruMG.Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling. Med Image Anal. 2014;18(4):635-646. doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.02.008
6.
SchaufelbergerMKühleRWachterA, et alA radiation-free classification pipeline for craniosynostosis using statistical shape modeling. Diagnostics. 2022;12(7):1516. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12071516
7.
HashimotoDARosmanGRusDMeirelesOR.Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70-76. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693
8.
MorrisMXFioccoDCanevaTYiapanisPOrgillDP.Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: implications for clinical practice and research. Front Surg. 2024;11:1393898. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1393898
9.
ChoMJHallacRREffendiMSeawardJRKaneAA.Comparison of an unsupervised machine learning algorithm and surgeon diagnosis in the clinical differentiation of metopic craniosynostosis and benign metopic ridge. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6312. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24756-7
10.
BlochKGeoffroyMTaverneM, et alNew diagnostic criteria for metopic ridges and trigonocephaly: a 3D geometric approach. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024;19(1):204. doi:10.1186/s13023-024-03197-8
11.
DaiYItaiTPeiG, et alDeepFace: Deep-learning-based framework to contextualize orofacial-cleft-related variants during human embryonic craniofacial development. HGG Adv. 2024;5(3):100322. doi:10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100312
12.
KangGBaekSHKimYHKimDHParkJW.Genetic risk assessment of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate by linking genetic networks and deep learning models. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4557. doi:10.3390/ijms24054557
13.
KuwadaCArijiYKiseY, et alDeep-learning systems for diagnosing cleft palate on panoramic radiographs in patients with cleft alveolus. Oral Radiol. 2023;39(2):349-354. doi:10.1007/s11282-022-00644-9
14.
KuwadaCArijiYKiseY, et alDetection of unilateral and bilateral cleft alveolus on panoramic radiographs using a deep-learning system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52(8):20210436. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20210436
15.
KuwadaCArijiYKiseY, et alDetection and classification of unilateral cleft alveolus with and without cleft palate on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning system. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16044. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95653-9
16.
MathadVCSchererNChapmanKLissJMBerishaV.A deep learning algorithm for objective assessment of hypernasality in children with cleft palate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(10):2986-2996. doi:10.1109/TBME.2021.3058424
17.
MaierAHönigFBockletT, et alAutomatic detection of articulation disorders in children with cleft lip and palate. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;126(5):2589-2602. doi:10.1121/1.3216913
18.
ZhangYZhangJLiWYinHHeL.Automatic detection system for velopharyngeal insufficiency based on acoustic signals from nasal and oral channels. Diagnostics. 2023;13(16):2714. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13162714
19.
GolabbakhshMAbnaviFKadkhodaei ElyaderaniM, et alAutomatic identification of hypernasality in normal and cleft lip and palate patients with acoustic analysis of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017;141(2):929-935. doi:10.1121/1.4976056
20.
ShujaatSJazilOWillemsH, et alAutomatic segmentation of the pharyngeal airway space with convolutional neural network. J Dent. 2021;111:103705. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103705
21.
RuthvenMMiquelMEKingAP.Deep-learning-based segmentation of the vocal tract and articulators in real-time magnetic resonance images of speech. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;198:105814. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105814
22.
LeerahaCKusakunniranWYodrabumNChaisrisawadisukSVathanophasVSiriapisithT.Performance enhancement of deep learning based solutions for pharyngeal airway space segmentation on MRI scans. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):19671. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-70826-4
23.
KimDYWooSRohJY, et alSubregional pharyngeal changes after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients analyzed by convolutional neural networks-based segmentation. J Dent. 2023;135:104565. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104565
24.
SchieblJBauerFXGrillFLoeffelbeinDJ.RapidNAM: algorithm for the semi-automated generation of nasoalveolar molding device designs for the presurgical treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;67(5):1263-1271. doi:10.1109/TBME.2019.2934907
25.
WangXPastewaitMWuTH, et al3D morphometric quantification of maxillae and defects for patients with unilateral cleft palate via deep learning-based CBCT image auto-segmentation. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24Suppl 2:108-116. doi:10.1111/ocr.12482
26.
MirandaFChoudhariVBaroneS, et alInterpretable artificial intelligence for classification of alveolar bone defect in patients with cleft lip and palate. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):15861. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43125-7
27.
LuMZhangAWangY, et alAn artificial intelligence model for vascularity monitoring of postoperative flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36:1527-1532. Published online February 25, 2025. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011150
28.
ChoudharyANKumarS.The transformative role of artificial intelligence in cleft surgery. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anomalies. 2023;10(2):118-120. doi:10.4103/jclpca.jclpca_18_23
29.
GhodsKAziziAJafariAGhodsK.Application of Artificial Intelligence in clinical dentistry, a comprehensive review of literature. J Dent. 2023;24(4):356-371. doi:10.30476/dentjods.2023.96835.1969
30.
RasteauSErnenweinDSavoldelliCBouletreauP.Artificial intelligence for oral and maxillo-facial surgery: A narrative review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.01.010
31.
MehrotraDMarkusAF.Emerging simulation technologies in global craniofacial surgical training. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021;11(4):486-499. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.06.002
32.
DhruvSPawarP. The Cost of Implementing AI in Healthcare. aalpha. 2025.
MarcusHJRamirezPTKhanDZ, et alThe IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring. Nat Med. 2024;30(1):61-75. doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7
35.
DhawanRShaulyOShayDBrooksKLoskenA.Growth in FDA-approved artificial intelligence devices in plastic surgery: a key look into the future. Aesthet Surg J. 2024;45(1):108-111. doi:10.1093/asj/sjae209
36.
OzmenBB.Navigating FDA regulations for the development of artificial intelligence technologies in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2025;45(8):865-868. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaf051
