Abstract
Background:
Recurrent or repeat orbital floor and/or medial wall fractures may have an increased risk of globe injury and vision loss. To see if the initial orbital floor repair technique and/or chosen material for reconstruction impact the result, we studied repeat offenders who engage in: (1) repeat assaults, (2) unprotected sports injuries, or (3) seizure disorders.
Methods:
From 715 patients who underwent traumatic orbital floor repair over an 18-year period, 58 “repeat offenders” suffered a subsequent orbital fracture and were studied. Type of repair and outcomes including globe injuries were documented.
Results:
Repeat offenders who had a second orbital fracture had initial repairs with: resorbable plates (63.8%), titanium mesh (12.1%), and split cranial bone grafts (14%). More significant globe injuries occurred when initial repair was with titanium plates (86%) and bone grafts (14%) compared to resorbable plates (0%). Of the total group with initial orbital fractures and repair, 15% were categorized as “at risk” to be repeat offenders based on their medical history and activity. Of the “repeat offenders” who had an additional orbital fracture, 95% (50/58) fell into the “at risk” category for “repeat offending.”
Conclusion:
Resorbable plate orbital floor and/or medial wall fracture repair may offer less significant globe injury for repeat offenders at risk for subsequent orbital trauma.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.