Abstract
Objective:
Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) surgery in patients with cleft palate increases the risk for airway obstruction acutely. However, the long-term effects of VPI surgery on airway obstruction are unknown. In this work, we prospectively evaluated patient-reported sleep-related impairment scores as a screening tool for airway obstruction in patients with cleft palate (CP).
Methods:
Patients with CP > 14 years of age from 2 institutions were prospectively administered the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems sleep-related impairment short form. Patient characteristics, medical, and surgical histories were reviewed. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to assess the contribution of independent variables to sleep-related impairment scores.
Results:
Forty-four patients (mean age 20.5 ± 4.7 years) were included. Twenty-three patients (52.3%) were diagnosed with VPI. Seventeen patients (38.6%) underwent VPI surgery, of whom 14 patients (82.4%) were treated with sphincter pharyngoplasties at a mean age of 7.7 ± 4.1 years. Multivariable linear regression models to control for variables that could influence sleep-related impairment such as body mass index (BMI) ≥25 were developed to evaluate the contribution of VPI and VPI treatment. The diagnosis of VPI (β = .52, P = .004), VPI surgery (β = .48, P = .008), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (β = .47, P = .011) were found to independently predict sleep-related impairment in each of the respective regression models.
Conclusions:
A history of VPI, any type of VPI surgery, or sphincter pharyngoplasty were separately and independently predictive of patient-reported sleep-related impairment long-term. These data suggest that longitudinal airway obstruction screening in patients with cleft palate and VPI deserves consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
