Abstract
Acridine orange staining of exfoliated cells from epithelial tissues facilitates discrimination between normal and abnormal cells: abnormal cells develop highly elevated nuclear fluorescence. Comparisons of acridine orange (AO) staining with propidium iodide (PI) or Feulgen staining have shown that: (a) PI staining also provides highly elevated nuclear fluorescence from abnormal cells; (b) the distributions of nuclear fluorescence following AO or PI staining were usually not significantly different as judged by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; (c) fluorescence emission spectra from AO and PI stained cells are consistent with the hypothesis that both fluorochromes bind to DNA within cell nuclei; (d) DNAse treatment of AO stained normal cells eliminates the nuclear fluorescence peak from slit-scan contours; RNAse treatment has no effect on nuclear fluorescence; (e) the distribution of abnormal cell nuclear fluorescence after AO staining is usually, but not always, significantly different from the distribution of abnormal cell nuclear absorbance after Feulgen staining, with relative nuclear fluorescence being greater than relative nuclear absorbance. The hypothesis currently most consistent with these results is that elevated Feulgen DNA content can account for only part of the discrimination provided by AO staining, and that the chromatin within abnormal cells is altered so as to increase accessibility of DNA to intercalating dyes.