Oral-ocular synkinesis is a frequent sequela of idiopathic facial paralysis (IFP), yet objective, dynamic methods to quantify associated palpebral fissure changes remain limited.
Objective:
To objectively measure palpebral changes in IFP using automated facial tracking.
Design Type:
Case-control.
Methods:
A novel, video-based facial tracking software assessed facial expressions in 12 controls and 30 IFP cases with synkinesis at least 12 months from onset of IFP. Palpebral fissure dimensions were measured at rest and during smile, laugh, and pucker. Bilateral differences across expressions were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, and linear regression.
Results:
Puckering showed the greatest asymmetry (p < 0.001), with a 30.0% reduction in palpebral fissure size on the paralyzed side versus 21.6% on the non-paralyzed side, compared to a 1.7% reduction in controls. No significant differences were observed between paralyzed and non-paralyzed sides during rest-to-smile or rest-to-laugh expressions. Dynamic modeling found that puckering elicited the fastest and largest decline in palpebral fissure symmetry (slope = −0.196; standard error: 0.011; p < 0.001). Paralysis duration following 12 months had no significant effect on palpebral fissure changes.
Conclusion:
Dynamic facial tracking effectively quantifies expression-specific disruptions in oral-ocular coordination in IFP, particularly during puckering, offering objective data to support treatment planning and patient counseling.
AronowitzP, HarrisES. Facial synkinesis after Bell palsy. Ann Intern Med Clin Cases. 2023; 2(8); doi: 10.7326/AIMCC.2023.0685
3.
BoaheneKDO. Etiology, epidemiology, and pathophysiology of post-facial paralysis synkinesis. In: Management of Post-Facial Paralysis Synkinesis. Published online January 1, 2021:13–17. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-67331-0.00002-6
MariaCM, KimJ. Individualized management of facial synkinesis based on facial function. Acta Otolaryngol., 2017; 137(9):1010–1015; doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1316871
6.
KleissIJ, HohmanMH, QuatelaOE, et al.Computer-assisted assessment of ocular synkinesis: A comparison of methods. Laryngoscope., 2013; 123(4):879–883; doi: 10.1002/LARY.23778
BakerRS, StavaMW, NelsonKR, et al.Aberrant reinnervation of facial musculature in a subhuman primate: A correlative analysis of eyelid kinematics, muscle synkinesis, and motoneuron localization. Neurology., 1994; 44(11):2165–2173; doi: 10.1212/WNL.44.11.2165
9.
CrumleyRL. Mechanisms of synkinesis. Laryngoscope., 1979; 89(11):1847–1854; doi: 10.1288/00005537-197911000-00020
10.
ThomanderL. Reorganization of the facial motor nucleus after peripheral nerve regeneration: An HRP study in the rat. Acta Otolaryngol. 1984; 97(5–6):619–626; doi: 10.3109/00016488409132939
11.
NacimientoW, PodollK, GraeberMB, et al.Contralateral early blink reflex in patients with facial nerve palsy: Indication for synaptic reorganization in the facial nucleus during regeneration. J Neurol Sci., 1992; 109(2):148–155.
12.
ChoiD, RaismanG. Somatotopic organization of the facial nucleus is disrupted after lesioning and regeneration of the facial nerve: The histological representation of synkinesis. Neurosurgery., 2002; 50(2):355–362; doi: 10.1097/00006123-200202000-00022
13.
ShokriT, PatelS, ZiaiK, et al.Facial synkinesis: A distressing sequela of facial palsy. Ear Nose Throat J., 2024; 103(6):NP382–NP391; doi: 10.1177/01455613211054627
14.
MabvuureNT, HallamMJ, VenablesV, et al.Validation of a new photogrammetric technique to monitor the treatment effect of botulinum toxin in synkinesis. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27(7):860–864; doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.91
15.
van VeenMM, DusseldorpJR, HadlockTA. Long-term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis. Laryngoscope., 2018; 128(10):2291–2295; doi: 10.1002/LARY.27225
16.
IsonoM, MurataK, TanakaH, et al.An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 1996; 114(1):27–31; doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989670279-6
17.
RogersCR, SchmidtKL, VanswearingenJM, et al.Automated facial image analysis: Detecting improvement in abnormal facial movement after treatment with botulinum toxin A. Ann Plast Surg., 2007; 58(1):39–47; doi: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000250761.26824.4F
18.
WuZB, SilvermanCA, LinstromCJ, et al.Objective computerized versus subjective analysis of facial synkinesis. Laryngoscope., 2005; 115(12):2118–2122; doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000182811.49686.76
19.
LinstromCJ. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction. Laryngoscope., 2002; 112(7 Pt 1):1129–1147; doi: 10.1097/00005537-200207000-00001
20.
MehtaRP, WernickrobinsonM, HadlockTA. Validation of the synkinesis assessment questionnaire. Laryngoscope., 2007; 117(5):923–926; doi: 10.1097/MLG.0B013E3180412460
21.
CoulsonSE, CroxsonGR, AdamsRD, et al.Reliability of the “Sydney,” “Sunnybrook,” and “House Brackmann” facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 2005; 132(4):543–549; doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.027
VrabecJT, BackousDD, DjalilianHR, et al.; Facial Nerve Disorders Committee. Facial nerve grading system 2.0. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 2009; 140(4):445–450; doi: 10.1016/J.OTOHNS.2008.12.031
24.
RossBG, FradetG, NedzelskiJM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 1996; 114(3):380–386; doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989670206-1
25.
HartleyH, BlumenowW, WilliamsR, et al.Assessment and grading of synkinesis and facial palsy. In: Management of Post-Facial Paralysis Synkinesis. 2022:51–58; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-67331-0.00007-5 Published online January 1
26.
SchroffF, KalenichenkoD, PhilbinJ. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, USA, Published online 2015:815–823.
27.
Prados-TorreblancaA, BuenaposadaJM, BaumelaL. Shape preserving facial landmarks with graph attention networks. In: BMVC 2022–33rd British Machine Vision Conference Proceedings. Published online October 13, 2022. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.07233 Accessed August 4, 2025.
28.
KimuraT, NaritaK, OyamadaK, et al.Fine-tuning on AI-driven video analysis through machine learning: Development of an automated evaluation tool of facial palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg., 2025; 155(6):1071e–1081e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011924
29.
FengG, ZhuangY, GaoZ. Measurement and analysis of associated mimic muscle movements. J Otol., 2015; 10(1):39–45; doi: 10.1016/J.JOTO.2015.06.001
30.
RootAA, StephensJA. Organization of the central control of muscles of facial expression in man. J Physiol., 2003; 549(Pt 1):289–298; doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2002.035691
31.
DibeklioǧluH, SalahAA, GeversT. Are you really smiling at me? Spontaneous versus posed enjoyment smiles. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2012; 7574 LNCS(PART 3):525–538; doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33712-3_38
32.
OgawaraK, KuwabaraS, KamitsukasaI, et al.Trigeminal afferent input alters the excitability of facial motoneurons in hemifacial spasm. Neurology., 2004; 62(10):1749–1752; doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000125183.81555.E4
33.
RochaDD, BarbozaCR, FurlanRMMM, et al.Analysis of different tasks to normalize the electrical signal of the orbicularis oris muscle by maximum voluntary contraction: Pilot study. Audiol Commun Res. 2021; 26:e2400; doi: 10.1590/2317-6431-2020-2400
34.
SchumannNP, BongersK, ScholleHC, et al.Atlas of voluntary facial muscle activation: Visualization of surface electromyographic activities of facial muscles during mimic exercises. PLoS One. 2021; 16(7):e0254932; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254932
35.
TanakaM, SumitsujiN. Electromyographic study of facial expressions during pathological laughing and crying. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991; 31(7):399–406. Accessed August 16, 2025.
AlmarhoumiAA. Accuracy of artificial intelligence in predicting facial changes post-orthognathic surgery: A comprehensive scoping review. J Clin Exp Dent., 2024; 16(5):e624–e633; doi: 10.4317/JCED.61500
38.
GaberA, TaherMF, WahedMA, et al.Classification of facial paralysis based on machine learning techniques. Biomed Eng Online., 2022; 21(1):65–20; doi: 10.1186/S12938-022-01036-0
39.
ShiH, FanY, ZhangY, et al.Intelligent Bell facial paralysis assessment: A facial recognition model using improved SSD network. Sci Rep., 2024; 14(1):1–11; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63478-x
40.
ParkI, ParkJH, YoonJ, et al.Machine learning model of facial expression outperforms models using analgesia nociception index and vital signs to predict postoperative pain intensity: A pilot study. Korean J Anesthesiol., 2024; 77(2):195–204; doi: 10.4097/KJA.23583
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
