This review aims to assess the current landscape of implantable and prosthetic devices for dynamic facial reanimation. Evaluation will include mechanisms, reported effectiveness, and clinical feasibility.
Observations:
This scoping review included 34 primary studies published since 2000, focusing on prosthetic and implantable devices for dynamic facial reanimation. Four major categories emerged: electromyography–functional electrical stimulation (EMG–FES) systems, artificial muscles, electromagnetic actuators, and wearable prosthetics. Most research addressed periocular reanimation, particularly blinking, and several studies discussed midface and smile restoration. EMG–FES systems were the most represented and robust across animal in vivo models. Artificial muscle, electromagnetic actuators, and wearable prosthetics mostly remain in theoretical stages.
Conclusions and Relevance:
Although not yet fully viable, implantable and prosthetic devices show potential to complement or one day replace current surgical approaches to facial reanimation. EMG–FES systems offer the most viable near-term options. Clinically, these technologies may offer customizable, dynamic facial movement restoration, especially for patients with limited surgical options. Continued innovation and long-term safety studies will be essential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LeventhalDD, PribitkinEA. Static facial suspension with Surgisis ES (Enhanced Strength) Sling. Laryngoscope. 2008; 118(1):20–23; doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814b8d83
2.
OzakiM, TakushimaA, MomosawaA, et al.Temporary suspension of acute facial paralysis using the S-S cable suture (Medical U&A, Tokyo, Japan). Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 61(1):61–67; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31815614e4
3.
ShomanN. Nerve guide conduits, nerve transfers, and local and free muscle transfer in facial nerve palsy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 31(5):306–312; doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000914
4.
GarciaRM, HadlockTA, KlebucMJ, et al.Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(6):1025e–1046e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001273
5.
JonesK, TaylorSM, Al AfifA. Muscle transposition and free muscle transfer in facial nerve reanimation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 32(5):287–293; doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000940
6.
HarrisBN, TollefsonTT. Facial reanimation: Evolving from static procedures to free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 23(5):399–406; doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000193
7.
PanDR, ClarkNW, ChiangH, et al.The evolution of facial reanimation techniques. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023; 44(3):103822; doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103822
8.
AmerTA, ElSharkawyOA. The split hypoglossal nerve and cross-face nerve graft for dual innervation of the functional muscle transfer in facial reanimation. J Craniofac Surg. 2022; 33(8):2625–2630; doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008750
9.
KernH, HoferC, StrohhoferM, et al.Standing up with denervated muscles in humans using functional electrical stimulation. Artif Organs. 1999; 23(5):447–452; doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06376.x
10.
RakosM, FreudenschussB, GirschW, et al.Electromyogram‐Controlled functional electrical stimulation for treatment of the paralyzed upper extremity. Artif Organs. 1999; 23(5):466–469; doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06363.x
11.
SomiaNN, ZonnevijlleED, StremelRW, et al.Multi-channel orbicularis oculi stimulation to restore eye-blink function in facial paralysis. Microsurgery. 2001; 21(6):264–270; doi: 10.1002/micr.1050
12.
SachsNA, ChangEL, VyasN, et al.Electrical stimulation of the paralyzed orbicularis oculi in rabbit. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007; 15(1):67–75; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.891372
13.
SachsNA, WeilandJD. Electrical Stimulation of the Orbicularis Oculi to Restore Eye Blink. IEEE; 2007, 209–230.
14.
JieT, ZhiqiangG, GuodongF, et al.The effective stimulating pulse for restoration of blink function in unilateral facial nerve paralysis rabbits, verified by a simple FES system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 273(10):2959–2964; doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3884-2
15.
SahyouniR, BhattJ, DjalilianHR, et al.Selective stimulation of facial muscles with a penetrating electrode array in the feline model. Laryngoscope. 2017; 127(2):460–465; doi: 10.1002/lary.26078
16.
SunY, JinC, LiK, et al.Restoration of orbicularis oculi muscle function in rabbits with peripheral facial paralysis via an implantable artificial facial nerve system. Exp Ther Med. 2017; 14(6):5289–5296; doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5223
17.
AskariS, PresaccoA, SahyouniR, et al.Closed loop Microfabricated facial reanimation device coupling EMG-Driven facial nerve stimulation with a chronically implanted multichannel cuff electrode. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2018:2206–2209. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512778
18.
JowettN, KearneyRE, KnoxCJ, et al.Toward the bionic face: A novel neuroprosthetic device paradigm for facial reanimation consisting of neural blockade and functional electrical stimulation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(1):62e–76e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005164
19.
BobrovA, BatulinD, ShoferystovS, et al.Frankfurt institute for advanced studies, Germany, et al. implantable closed-loop system for restoration of blinking in case of unilateral facial nerve paralysis. J Int Adv Otol. 2021; 17(5):438–445; doi: 10.5152/iao.2021.21109
20.
JiaJ, YiX, WangM, et al.A blink restoration system with contralateral EMG triggered stimulation and real-time software based artifact blanking. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE; 2012:1536–1539. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2012.6271543
21.
YiX, JiaJ, DengS, et al.A Blink restoration system with contralateral EMG triggered stimulation and real-time artifact blanking. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2013; 7(2):140–148; doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2013.2255051
22.
AttiahMA, De VriesJ, RichardsonAG, et al.A rodent model of dynamic facial reanimation using functional electrical stimulation. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11:193; doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00193
23.
SahyouniR, GoshtasbiK, PresaccoA, et al.Selective facial muscle activation with acute and chronic multichannel cuff electrode implantation in a feline model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022; 131(4):365–372; doi: 10.1177/00034894211023218
24.
AbiriA, ChauS, JamesNR, et al.Selective neural electrical stimulation of an injured facial nerve using chronically implanted dual cuff electrodes. Brain Sci. 2022; 12(11):1457; doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111457
25.
KumarMGL, SairamRS, KumarGDVS, et al.Low power, low area, analog blink restoration system with auto sleep mode for unilateral facial paralysis patients. In: 2017 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS). IEEE; 2017:1–4. doi:10.1109/BIOCAS.2017.8325064
26.
Lakshmana KumarMG, Santhosh KumarGDV, SairamRS, et al.Flexible functional electrical stimulation architecture with external remote controller for unilateral facial paralysis patients. In: IECON 2018 - 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE; 2018:3330–3335; doi:10.1109/IECON.2018.8592799
ZhangY, LiKY, JinC, et al.Comparative studies on the implantation of nano platinum black and pure platinum electrodes in the rabbit orbicularis oculi muscle. J Laryngol Otol. 2014; 128(8):679–689; doi: 10.1017/S0022215114001558
29.
RaslanA, Guntinas‐LichiusO, VolkGF. Altered facial muscle innervation pattern in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis. Laryngoscope. 2020; 130(5):E320–E326; doi: 10.1002/lary.28149
30.
TollefsonTT, SendersCW. Restoration of eyelid closure in facial paralysis using artificial muscle: Preliminary cadaveric analysis. Laryngoscope. 2007; 117(11):1907–1911; doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31812e0190
31.
CoulterF, BreedonP, VloeberghsM. Dynamic facial prosthetics for sufferers of facial paralysis. Australas Med J. 2011; 4(10):555–562; doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.921
32.
MazzaP, ShinM, SantamariaA. Shape memory alloy as artificial muscles for facial prosthesis. In: Volume 3: Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering.American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2017:V003T04A077. doi:10.1115/IMECE2017-71621
33.
KonstantinidiS, MartinezT, BenouhibaA, et al.Soft actuators for facial reanimation. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2022:11109–11114. doi:10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9982089
34.
GaraiM, MahatoM, NamS, et al.Metal organic framework‐MXene Nanoarchitecture for fast responsive and ultra‐stable electro‐ionic artificial muscles. Adv Funct Materials. 2023; 33(10):2212252; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202212252
35.
LedgerwoodLG, TinlingS, SendersC, et al.Artificial muscle for reanimation of the paralyzed face: Durability and biocompatibility in a Gerbil model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012; 14(6):413–418; doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2012.696
36.
AşikMD, YaprakB, GüvenE, et al.A Device for the functional improvement of Lagophthalmos. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24(4):1478–1482; doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182903580
37.
HasmatS, LovellNH, EvistonT, et al.Creating eye closure in patients with facial nerve paralysis using an implantable solenoid actuator. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2015:1357–1360. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318620
38.
HasmatS, LovellNH, SuaningGJ, et al.Restoration of eye closure in facial paralysis using implantable electromagnetic actuator. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69(11):1521–1525; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.005
39.
HasmatS, ClearyJ, SuaningGJ, et al.Dynamic facial reanimation using active implantable prosthesis: Restoring blink. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74(7):1633–1701; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.01.001
40.
HasmatS, LovellNH, LowTH, et al.Development of an implantable bionic for dynamic eye closure in facial nerve paralysis: Evolution of the design. Med Eng Phys. 2023; 115:103977; doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.103977
41.
ClearyJD, KekesiO, HasmatS, et al.Overcoming facial paralysis with an implantable actuator for restoration of blink. In 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2022:1498–1501; doi:10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871833
42.
FrigerioA, HadlockTA, MurrayEH, et al.Infrared-Based blink-detecting glasses for facial pacing: Toward a bionic blink. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 16(3):211–218; doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.1
43.
KozakiY, SuzukiK. A Facial Wearable Robot for Supporting Eye Opening and Closure Movement. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2017.
44.
PruscinoP, PhanPT, DaviesJ, et al.A proof-of-concept assessment of a novel wearable eyelid muscle device: A pre-clinical animal cadaver study for eyelid closure restoration. Adv Robot Res. 2025:202500048; doi: 10.1002/adrr.202500048
45.
WillseyMS, Nason-TomaszewskiSR, EnselSR, et al.Real-time brain-machine interface in non-human primates achieves high-velocity prosthetic finger movements using a shallow feedforward neural network decoder. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):6899; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34452-w
46.
MoradiA, RafieiH, DaliriM, et al.Clinical implementation of a bionic hand controlled with kineticomyographic signals. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14805; doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19128-1
47.
QuM, LvD, ZhouJ, et al.Sensing and controlling strategy for upper extremity prosthetics based on piezoelectric Micromachined ultrasound transducer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 71(4):1161–1169; doi: 10.1109/TBME.2023.3329826
48.
BrikoA, KapravchukV, KobelevA, et al.A way of bionic control based on EI, EMG, and FMG signals. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 22(1):152; doi: 10.3390/s22010152
49.
PetriniFM, MazzoniA, RigosaJ, et al.Microneurography as a tool to develop decoding algorithms for peripheral neuro-controlled hand prostheses. Biomed Eng Online. 2019; 18(1):44; doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0659-9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
