Facial palsy (FP) can impair nonverbal communication, and patients often report difficulty recognizing emotional expressions in others.
Objective:
To compare early cortical processing of emotional facial expressions in healthy controls, FP patients, and patients who had undergone facial reanimation surgery using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and analyzing the M170 component, a face-sensitive neuromagnetic response.
Methods:
Neuromagnetic responses were recorded with a whole-head 306-sensors MEG system. We studied M170 responses to angry, happy, sad, and neutral faces in 10 healthy controls, 5 untreated FP patients, 11 patients with hypoglossal-facial nerve transfer (HFNT), and 4 patients with temporalis muscle transfer.
Results:
Untreated FP patients had delayed M170 latencies (174.8 ± 14.5 ms) and increased amplitudes (430.2 ± 214.2 fT) compared with controls (162.8 ± 8.6 ms and 306.0 ± 185.0 fT). HFNT patients demonstrated reduced latencies (167.7 ± 12.5 ms) and amplitudes (285.5 ± 125.2 fT) relative to FP patients, approximating control values. No significant hemispheric effects or emotion-specific modulation were observed.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that facial reanimation via HFNT may promote partial normalization of cortical processing of facial emotions, reflecting adaptive neuroplasticity. This study supports the facial feedback hypothesis, whereby the ability to express facial emotions contributes to effective emotion recognition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PicardD, HervochonR, LannadereE, et al.Impact of Bell’s palsy in facial emotion recognition: A prospective observational study of 60 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025; 282(1):499–507; doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08999-x
2.
StorbeckF, SchlegelmilchK, StreitbergerK-J, et al.Delayed recognition of emotional facial expressions in Bell’s palsy. Cortex. 2019; 120:524–531; doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.015
3.
KonnerthV, MohrG, von PiekartzH. Emotion recognition in patients with peripheral facial paralysis–A pilot study. Rehabilitation (Stuttg)., 2016; 55(1):19–25; doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100228
4.
KuttenreichA-M, VolkGF, Guntinas-LichiusO, et al.Facial emotion recognition in patients with post-paralytic facial Synkinesis-A present competence. Diagnostics (Basel)., 2022; 12(5):1138; doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051138
5.
LamasG, GatignolP, BarbutJ, et al.Hypoglossofacial anastomosis for facial palsy treatment: Indications and results. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2015; 60(5):430–435; doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2015.07.002
6.
SargentP. Four cases of facial paralysis treated by hypoglosso-facial anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1912; 5(Neurol Sect):69–70.
7.
TankéréF, MaisonobeT, NaccacheL, et al.Further evidence for a central reorganisation of synaptic connectivity in patients with hypoglossal–facial anastomosis in man. Brain Res. 2000; 864(1):87–94; doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02177-6
8.
WillerJC, TankéréF, MaisonobeT, et al.Hypoglossal-facial anastomosis induced central plastic changes in the blink reflex circuitry. Mov Disord., 2002; 17(Suppl 2):S53–S57; doi: 10.1002/mds.10060
9.
LingM, SuiB, SuD, et al.Central functional reorganization and recovery following facial-hypoglossal neurorrhaphy for facial paralysis. Neuroimage Clin. 2021; 32:102782; doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102782
10.
BernatI, VitteE, LamasG, et al.Related timing for peripheral and central plasticity in hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis. Muscle Nerve. 2006; 33(3):334–341; doi: 10.1002/mus.20464
PatelNN, ZebolskyAL, ParkAM, et al.Smile outcomes of an externally scarless, intraoral orthodromic temporalis tendon transfer. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022; 24(2):83–88; doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0028
13.
HervochonR, ChaumonM, ZiriD, et al.Cerebral plasticity after lengthening temporalis myoplasty in facial palsy: A magnetoencephalography study. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025; 27(2):145–147; doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0235
14.
GarmiR, LabbéD, CoskunO, et al.Lengthening temporalis myoplasty and brain plasticity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013; 58(4):271–276; doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2013.03.002
15.
TiedtHO, LueschowA, PaulsA, et al.The face-responsive M170 is modulated by sensor selection: An example of circularity in the analysis of MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods. 2016; 266:137–140; doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.022
16.
OharaN, HiranoY, OribeN, et al.Neurophysiological face processing deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia: An MEG study. Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:554844; doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.554844
17.
SimpsonMIG, JohnsonSR, PrendergastG, et al.MEG adaptation resolves the spatiotemporal characteristics of face-sensitive brain responses. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(45):15088–15096; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2090-15.2015
18.
GaoZ, GoldsteinA, HarpazY, et al.A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013; 34(8):1783–1795; doi: 10.1002/hbm.22028
19.
McPartlandJ, DawsonG, WebbSJ, et al.Event-related brain potentials reveal anomalies in temporal processing of faces in autism spectrum disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004; 45(7):1235–1245; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00318.x
20.
FeuerriegelD, ChurchesO, HofmannJ, et al.The N170 and face perception in psychiatric and neurological disorders: A systematic review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 126(6):1141–1158; doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.015
21.
McCleeryA, LeeJ, JoshiA, et al.Meta-analysis of face processing event-related potentials in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 77(2):116–126; doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.015
22.
SaavedraC, OlivaresEI, IglesiasJ. Cognitive decline effects at an early stage: Evidence from N170 and VPP. Neurosci Lett. 2012; 518(2):149–153; doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.075
23.
CaoX, YangQ, HuF. Eyeglasses elicit effects similar to face-like perceptual expertise: Evidence from the N170 response. Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(3):883–891; doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4525-0
24.
SongS, WuM, FengC. Early influence of emotional scenes on the encoding of fearful expressions with different intensities: An event-related potential study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:866253; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.866253
25.
PreteG, D’AnselmoA, TommasiL. A neural signature of exposure to masked faces after 18 months of COVID-19. Neuropsychologia., 2022; 174:108334; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108334
26.
MetzenE, NayyeriMD, SchäferR, et al.Emotion processing of facial affect expression in patients with somatic symptom disorder with predominant pain–An EEG-study. Neuroimage. 2025; 307:121036; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121036
de JonghFW, SanchesEE, LuijmesR, et al.Cosmetic appreciation and emotional processing in patients with a peripheral facial palsy: A systematic review. Neuropsychologia., 2021; 158:107894; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107894
37.
KheirkhahM, BrodoehlS, LeistritzL, et al.Abnormal emotional processing and emotional experience in patients with peripheral facial nerve paralysis: An MEG study. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(3):147; doi: 10.3390/brainsci10030147
38.
JeongJ, YoonSR, LimH, et al.Risk for depression and anxiety in patients with facial palsy based on population-based data from Korea. Acta Otolaryngol. 2023; 143(11–12):1001–1004; doi: 10.1080/00016489.2024.2302899
39.
ZwickJC, WolkensteinL. Facial emotion recognition, theory of mind and the role of facial mimicry in depression. J Affect Disord. 2017; 210:90–99; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.022
40.
LiuY, DongK, SunL. Divergent spatiotemporal signatures characterize impaired facial emotional recognition in major depressive disorder: An event-related microstate study. J Affect Disord. 2025; 381:281–290; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.04.038
