Response to Letter: Sadati et al.’s “Anatomical Concerns and the Use of the Term Preservation in Referring to Procedures” A Scientific Defense of the Preservation Facelift Approach
Restricted accessLetterFirst published online November, 2025
Response to Letter: Sadati et al.’s “Anatomical Concerns and the Use of the Term Preservation in Referring to Procedures” A Scientific Defense of the Preservation Facelift Approach
GentileR. Letter: Roskies et al.’s “Limited delamination modifications to the extended deep plane rhytidectomy: An anatomical basis for improved outcomes”: Anatomical concerns and the use of the term preservation in referring to procedures. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025; 27(3):206–208; doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2025.0070
2.
RoskiesM, BrayD, GordonNA, et al.Limited delamination modifications to the extended deep plane rhytidectomy: An anatomical basis for improved outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2024; 26(6):657–664; doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0018
3.
SadatiK, MathieuO, CetruloCL, et al.Advancements in face lift techniques: Preservation face lift with a rotating pedicle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2025; 13(3):e6619; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006619
4.
WhetzelTP, MathesSJ. Arterial anatomy of the face: an analysis of vascular territories and perforating cutaneous vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 89(4):591–603; discussion 604-605.
5.
RohrichRJ, PessaJE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121(5):1804–1809; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816c3c1a
6.
JaconoAA, AlemiAS, HarmonJJ, et al.The effect of a novel platysma hammock flap during extended deep plane facelift on the signs of aging in the neck. Aesthet Surg J. 2022; 42(8):845–857; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac086
