Enterococcus faecium are gram-positive, multidrug-resistant bacteria that are endemic in healthcare settings. Bacteriophage therapy could be an adjunctive treatment for E. faecium infections.
Materials and Methods:
We isolated four new Minhovirus phages using E. faecium strain ATCC 19434 as a host.
Results:
Phage genomes were each ∼19 kb in length, and were highly related to each other and to other previously isolated Minhovirus phages. Host range testing suggested a narrow spectrum of activity. In vitro-evolved phage-resistant mutants acquired mutations in the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (epa) and capsular polysaccharide (cps) loci. Additional testing found that some phages were able to infect E. faecium clinical isolates with similar epa loci, further implicating epa as a putative receptor for Minhovirus phage infection.
Conclusions:
Overall, this study increases our understanding of phages that target E. faecium and increases the number of characterized phages that are active against this important pathogen.
DubinK, PamerEG. Enterococci and their interactions with the intestinal microbiome. Microbiol Spectr, 2014; 5(6); doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.BAD-0014-2016
2.
Van TyneD, GilmoreMS. Friend turned foe: Evolution of enterococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2014; 68:337–356; doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-113003
FioreE, Van TyneD, GilmoreMS. Pathogenicity of enterococci. Microbiol Spectr, 2019; 7(4); doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0053-2018
5.
LebretonF, MansonAL, SaavedraJT, et al.Tracing the enterococci from paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell, 2017; 169(5):849–861.e13; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.027
6.
EdmondMB, OberJF, DawsonJD, et al.Vancomycin-Resistant enterococcal bacteremia: Natural history and attributable mortality. Clin Infect Dis, 1996; 23(6):1234–1239; doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.6.1234
7.
ContrerasGA, MunitaJM, SimarS, et al.Contemporary clinical and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: A prospective multicenter cohort study (VENOUS I). Open Forum Infect Dis, 2022; 9(3):ofab616; doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab616
8.
CheahAL, SpelmanT, LiewD, et al.Enterococcal bacteraemia: Factors influencing mortality, length of stay and costs of hospitalization. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2013; 19(4):E181–E189; doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12132
9.
ShayDK, MaloneySA, MontecalvoM, et al.Epidemiology and mortality risk of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections. J Infect Dis, 1995; 172(4):993–1000; doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.4.993
10.
AriasCA, MurrayBE. The rise of the enterococcus: Beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2012; 10(4):266–278; doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2761
11.
SuhGA, LodiseTP, TammaPD, et al.; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group. Considerations for the use of phage therapy in clinical practice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2022; 66(3):e0207121; doi: 10.1128/AAC.02071-21
12.
StellfoxME, FernandesC, ShieldsRK, et al.Bacteriophage and antibiotic combination therapy for recurrent Enterococcus faecium bacteremia. mBio, 2024; 15(3):e0339623; doi: 10.1128/mbio.03396-23
13.
PaulK, MerabishviliM, HazanR, et al.Bacteriophage rescue therapy of a vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium Infection in a one-year-old child following a third liver transplantation. Viruses, 2021; 13(9):1785; doi: 10.3390/v13091785
14.
GreenSI, ClarkJR, SantosHH, et al.A retrospective, observational study of 12 cases of expanded-access customized phage therapy: Production, characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis, 2023; 77(8):1079–1091; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad335
15.
AlrafaieAM, PyrzanowskaK, SmithEM, et al.A diverse set of Enterococcus-infecting phage provides insight into phage host-range determinants. Virus Res, 2024; 347:199426; doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199426
16.
PradalI, CasadoA, Del RioB, et al.Enterococcus faecium Bacteriophage vB_EfaH_163, a new member of the herelleviridae family, reduces the mortality associated with an E. faecium vanR clinical isolate in a galleria mellonella animal model. Viruses, 2023; 15(1):179; doi: 10.3390/v15010179
17.
RamadanA, Abdel-MonemMO, El-DougdougNK, et al.Fully Characterized Effective Bacteriophages Specific against Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis, the Causative Agent of Dental Abscess. Medicina (Kaunas), 2024; 60(3):501; doi: 10.3390/medicina60030501
18.
RazaT, AndleebS, UllahSR, et al.Isolation and Characterization of a Phage to Control Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus Faecium. Open Life Sci, 2018; 13:553–560; doi: 10.1515/biol-2018-0066
19.
SongF, ShengJ, TanJ, et al.Characterization of an Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage SFQ1 as a potential therapeutic agent. Front Microbiol, 2023; 14:1210319; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1210319
20.
HymanP. Phages for Phage Therapy: Isolation, Characterization, and Host Range Breadth. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2019; 12(1):35; doi: 10.3390/ph12010035
21.
CanfieldGS, DuerkopBA. Molecular mechanisms of enterococcal-bacteriophage interactions and implications for human health. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2020; 56:38–44; doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.06.003
22.
PayneLJ, MeadenS, MestreMR, et al.PADLOC: A web server for the identification of antiviral defence systems in microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2022; 50(W1):W541–W550; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac400
23.
TessonF, HervéA, MordretE, et al.Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):2561; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9
24.
NéronB, DeniseR, ColuzziC, et al.MacSyFinder v2: Improved modelling and search engine to identify molecular systems in genomes. Peer Community Journal, 2023; 3; doi: 10.24072/pcjournal.250
25.
TessonF, PlanelR, EgorovA, et al.A comprehensive resource for exploring antiphage defense: DefenseFinder Webservice. Wiki and Databases. bioRxiv, 2024; 2024(01.25.577194); doi: 10.1101/2024.01.25.577194
26.
StachurskaX, RoszakM, JabłońskaJ, et al.Double-Layer Agar (DLA) Modifications for the First Step of the Phage-Antibiotic Synergy (PAS) Identification. Antibiotics (Basel), 2021; 10(11):1306; doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111306
27.
PrjibelskiA, AntipovD, MeleshkoD, et al.Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 2020; 70(1):e102; doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102
28.
AzizRK, BartelsD, BestAA, et al.The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics, 2008; 9(1):75; doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
BourasG, NepalR, HoutakG, et al.Pharokka: A fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics, 2023; 39(1):btac776; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776
31.
McNairK, ZhouC, DinsdaleEA, et al.PHANOTATE: A novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes. Bioinformatics, 2019; 35(22):4537–4542; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz265
32.
ChanPP, LinBY, MakAJ, et al.tRNAscan-SE 2.0: Improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(16):9077–9096; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688
33.
LaslettD, CanbackB. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004; 32(1):11–16; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152
34.
BlandC, RamseyTL, SabreeF, et al.CRISPR Recognition Tool (CRT): A tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007; 8(1):209; doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-209
35.
TerzianP, Olo NdelaE, GaliezC, et al.PHROG: Families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology. NAR Genom Bioinform, 2021; 3(3):lqab067; doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab067
36.
ChenL, YangJ, YuJ, et al.VFDB: A reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res, 2005; 33(Database issue):D325–D328; doi: 10.1093/nar/gki008
37.
AlcockBP, RaphenyaAR, LauTTY, et al.CARD 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48(D1):D517–D525; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935
38.
SteineggerM, SödingJ. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol, 2017; 35(11):1026–1028; doi: 10.1038/nbt.3988
39.
LarraldeM, ZellerG. PyHMMER: A Python library binding to HMMER for efficient sequence analysis. Bioinformatics, 2023; 39(5):btad214; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad214
40.
CookR, BrownN, RedgwellT, et al.INfrastructure for a PHAge REference Database: Identification of Large-Scale Biases in the Current Collection of Cultured Phage Genomes. Phage (New Rochelle), 2021; 2(4):214–223; doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0007
41.
OndovBD, TreangenTJ, MelstedP, et al.Mash: Fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol, 2016; 17(1):132; doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x
42.
MillardA, DeniseR, LestidoM, et al.taxmyPHAGE: Automated taxonomy of dsDNA phage genomes at the genus and species level. bioRxiv 2024;2024.08.09.606593; doi: 10.1101/2024.08.09.606593
43.
JainC, Rodriguez-RLM, PhillippyAM, et al.High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun, 2018; 9(1):5114; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9
DeatherageDE, BarrickJE. Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. Methods Mol Biol, 2014; 1151:165–188; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12
46.
RamosY, SansoneS, MoralesDK. Sugarcoating it: Enterococcal polysaccharides as key modulators of host-pathogen interactions. PLoS Pathog, 2021; 17(9):e1009822; doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009822
47.
QinX, Galloway-PeñaJR, SillanpaaJ, et al.Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus faecium strain TX16 and comparative genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium genomes. BMC Microbiol, 2012; 12(1):135; doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-135
48.
WakinakaT, MatsutaniM, WatanabeJ, et al.Identification of capsular polysaccharide synthesis loci determining bacteriophage susceptibility in tetragenococcus halophilus. Microbiol Spectr, 2023; 11(3):e00385-23; doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00385-23
PageAJ, CumminsCA, HuntM, et al.Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics, 2015; 31(22):3691–3693; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421
51.
StamatakisA. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30(9):1312–1313; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
52.
NishimuraY, YoshidaT, KuronishiM, et al.ViPTree: The viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics, 2017; 33(15):2379–2380; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157
53.
LetunicI, BorkP. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res, 2024; 52(W1):W78–W82; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268
54.
LossouarnJ, BrietA, MoncautE, et al.Enterococcus faecalis Countermeasures Defeat a Virulent Picovirinae Bacteriophage. Viruses, 2019; 11(1):48; doi: 10.3390/v11010048
55.
MaF, NingY, WanQ, et al.Bacteriophages LSA2308 and LSA2366 infecting drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Isolation, characterization and potential application for milk safety. Lwt, 2021; 152:112298; doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112298
56.
WangR, XingS, ZhaoF, et al.Characterization and genome analysis of novel phage vB_EfaP_IME195 infecting Enterococcus faecalis. Virus Genes, 2018; 54(6):804–811; doi: 10.1007/s11262-018-1608-6
57.
MillsEG, HewlettK, SmithAB, et al.Bacteriocin production facilitates nosocomial emergence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Nat Microbiol, 2025; 10(4):871–881; doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-01958-0
58.
DavisJL, NorwoodJS, SmithRE, et al.Dissecting the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (EPA) structure to explore innate immune evasion and phage specificity. Carbohydr Polym, 2025; 347:122686; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122686
59.
SundermannAJ, KumarP, GriffithMP, et al.Real-time genomic surveillance for enhanced healthcare outbreak detection and control: Clinical and economic impact. Clin Infect Dis, 2025:ciaf216; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf216
60.
MeloLDR, FerreiraR, CostaAR, et al.Efficacy and safety assessment of two enterococci phages in an in vitro biofilm wound model. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):6643; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43115-8
61.
WandroS, GhatbaleP, AttaiH, et al.Phage cocktails constrain the growth of Enterococcus. mSystems, 2022; 7(4):e0001922; doi: 10.1128/msystems.00019-22
KortrightKE, ChanBK, TurnerPE. High-throughput discovery of phage receptors using transposon insertion sequencing of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020; 117(31):18670–18679; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001888117
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
