The purpose of this study was to examine the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of adding a Tai Chi Easy (TCE) intervention to an asynchronously delivered online diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program for working adults ages 40 to 64 years old diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods:
Participants attended the online intervention after providing informed consent. Recorded videos (45-minutes DSMES and 45-minutes TCE) were sent to participants via Research Electronic Data Capture twice weekly for 6 weeks. DSMES+TCE intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility was assessed postintervention using a validated tool. Using validated self-report measures and finger-worn sensors, physical health was assessed preintervention, and psychological health and health behaviors were assessed preintervention and postintervention.
Results:
Twenty-eight participants (mean age = 51, 68% females) completed the study. Participants mainly used diet and exercise (71%) and oral medication (75%) to treat their T2DM but had elevated A1C levels (6.74 ± 1.16) preintervention. Participants reported 89% acceptability, 85% appropriateness, and 100% feasibility of the online DSMES+TCE intervention. Compared to preintervention, there was a reduction in diabetes-related distress, depression, stressful life events, and perceived stress and greater diabetes quality of life postintervention. In addition, they increased their daily total fruit and vegetable intake, reduced added sugar intake, and increased daily sleep duration postintervention compared to preintervention.
Conclusion:
The addition of TCE to the standardized DSMES curriculum was found to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible as a remotely delivered asynchronous online intervention for working adults ages 40 to 64 years with T2DM.
ParkerEDLinJMahoneyT, et al. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2022. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(1):26-43. doi:10.2337/dci23-0085
3.
AhmedMZulfiqarEShafiqA, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus-related mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2023. JACC Adv. 2025;4(7):101882. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101882
4.
HatipogluBPronovostPJ.Role of diabetes self-management education for our health systems and economy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025;110(suppl 2):S91-S99. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae913
5.
AhmadFJoshiSH.Self-care practices and their role in the control of diabetes: a narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41409. doi:10.7759/cureus.41409
6.
TharakanAMcPeek HinzEZhuE, et al. Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead. Health Aff Sch. 2024;2(8):qxae097. doi:10.1093/haschl/qxae097
7.
ErnawatiUWihastutiTAUtamiYW.Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education (DSME) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients: systematic literature review. J Public Health Res. 2021;10(2):2240. doi:10.4081/jphr.2021.2240
8.
McGowenCLAppelSJ.Exploring the clinical outcomes of implementing diabetes self-management education and support in a primary care practice: a quality improvement project. J Dr Nurs Pract. Published online June 27, 2023. doi:10.1891/JDNP-2021-0046
9.
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 5. Facilitating positive health behaviors and well-being to improve health outcomes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(suppl 1):S77-S110. doi:10.2337/dc24-S005
10.
OryMGHanGNsobunduCCarpenterKTowneSDJrSmithML.Comparative effectiveness of diabetes self-management education and support intervention strategies among adults with type 2 diabetes in Texas. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1543298. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1543298
11.
SiminerioLKrallJJohnsonP, et al. Examining a diabetes self-management education and support telemedicine model with high-risk patients in a rural community. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023;17(5):1190-1197. doi:10.1177/19322968231180884
12.
VersluisABoelsAMHuijdenMCGMijnsbergenMDRuttenGVosRC.Diabetes self-management education and support delivered by mobile health (mHealth) interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2025;42(5):e70002. doi:10.1111/dme.70002
13.
AlosFPuig-RiberaABort-RoigJ, et al. Incorporating sedentary behaviour for identifying risk of type 2 diabetes: implications for primary care. Prim Care Diabetes. 2025;19(3):214-220. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2025.03.001
14.
StageAWibaekRRonnPF, et al. The physical activity health paradox in type 2 diabetes. Am J Prev Med. 2025;68(3):545-554. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.018
15.
WeiJFanLHeZ, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus attributable to low physical activity from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025;22(1):8. doi:10.1186/s12966-025-01709-8
16.
ChaoMWangCDongXDingM.The effects of tai chi on type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:7350567. doi:10.1155/2018/7350567
17.
ZhangFChenXLiuX, et al. Lifestyle intervention tai chi for adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a PRIO-harms based overview of 17 systematic reviews. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1208202. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1208202
18.
ChanAWKChairSYLeeDTF, et al. Tai chi exercise is more effective than brisk walking in reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors among adults with hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:44-52. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.009
19.
QinJChenYGuoS, et al. Effect of tai chi on quality of life, body mass index, and waist-hip ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:543627. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.543627
20.
Tickle-DegnenL.Nuts and bolts of conducting feasibility studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(2):171-176. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.006270
21.
TeresiJAYuXStewartALHaysRD.Guidelines for designing and evaluating feasibility pilot studies. Med Care. 2022;60(1):95-103. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001664
22.
BowenDJKreuterMSpringB, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452-457. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
23.
Des JarlaisDCLylesCCrepazNGroupT.Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):361-366. doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361
24.
Taylor-PiliaeREHokeTMHepworthJTLattLDNajafiBCoullBM.Effect of tai chi on physical function, fall rates and quality of life among older stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(5):816-824. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.001
25.
Taylor-PiliaeREMorrisonHWHsuCPWhitmanSGrandnerM.The feasibility of tai chi exercise as a beneficial mind-body intervention in a group of community-dwelling stroke survivors with symptoms of depression. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:8600443. doi:10.1155/2021/8600443
26.
WeinerBJLewisCCStanickC, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):108. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
27.
ParkJIBaekHKimSW, et al. Questionnaire-based survey of demographic and clinical characteristics, health behaviors, and mental health of young Korean adults with early-onset diabetes. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(26):e182. doi:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e182
28.
Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes Care. 1988;11(9):725-732. doi:10.2337/diacare.11.9.725
29.
PolonskyWHFisherLEarlesJ, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626-631. doi:10.2337/diacare.28.3.626
30.
FisherLHesslerDMPolonskyWHMullanJ.When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2):259-264. doi:10.2337/dc11-1572
31.
ChinYWLaiPSChiaYC.The validity and reliability of the English version of the diabetes distress scale for type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):25. doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0601-9
32.
KroenkeKSpitzerRLWilliamsJB.The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606-613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
33.
CarrollHAHookKPerezOFR, et al. Establishing reliability and validity for mental health screening instruments in resource-constrained settings: systematic review of the PHQ-9 and key recommendations. Psychiatry Res. 2020;291:113236. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113236
34.
ShaffJKahnGWilcoxHC.An examination of the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a multiracial/ethnic population in the United States. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1290736. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1290736
35.
WeathersFLitzBHermanDHuskaJKeaneT.The PTSD Checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at: International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; October1993; San Antonio, TX.
36.
RuggieroKJDel BenKScottiJRRabalaisAE.Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. J Trauma Stress. 2003;16(5):495-502. doi:10.1023/A:1025714729117
37.
CohenSKamarckTMermelsteinR.A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385-396.
38.
CohenSWilliamsonGM.Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: SpacapanSOskampS, eds. The Social Psychology of Health. Sage; 1988:31-67.
39.
Taylor-PiliaeREHaskellWLWatersCMFroelicherES.Change in perceived psychosocial status following a 12-week tai chi exercise programme. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(3):313-329. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03809.x
40.
ThompsonFEMidthuneDKahleLDoddKW.Development and evaluation of the National Cancer Institute’s dietary screener questionnaire scoring algorithms. J Nutr. 2017;147(6):1226-1233. doi:10.3945/jn.116.246058
41.
Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) in the NHANES 2009-10: Data Processing & Scoring Procedures. National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences; 2024.
42.
SievenpiperJLDworatzekPD.Food and dietary pattern-based recommendations: an emerging approach to clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy in diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37(1):51-57. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2012.11.001
43.
Diabetes, Nutrition Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Evidence-based European recommendations for the dietary management of diabetes. Diabetologia. 2023;66(6):965-985. doi:10.1007/s00125-023-05894-8
44.
Vega-LopezSChavezAFarrKJAinsworthBE.Validity and reliability of two brief physical activity questionnaires among Spanish-speaking individuals of Mexican descent. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:29. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-29
45.
TopolskiTDLoGerfoJPatrickDLWilliamsBWalwickJPatrickMB.The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(4):A118.
46.
HenriksenASvartdalFGrimsgaardSHartvigsenGHopstockLA.Polar vantage and Oura physical activity and sleep trackers: validation and comparison study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(5):e27248. doi:10.2196/27248
47.
KinnunenHRantanenAKenttaTKoskimakiH.Feasible assessment of recovery and cardiovascular health: accuracy of nocturnal HR and HRV assessed via ring PPG in comparison to medical grade ECG. Physiol Meas. 2020;41(4):04NT01. doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ab840a
48.
de ZambottiMRosasLColrainIMBakerFC.The sleep of the ring: comparison of the OURA sleep tracker against polysomnography. Behav Sleep Med. 2019;17(2):124-136. doi:10.1080/15402002.2017.1300587
49.
OrsmondGICohnES.The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR. 2015;35(3):169-177. doi:10.1177/1539449215578649
50.
ChenZYuanNPTaylor-PiliaeRE, et al. The wearable sensors and virtual reality for Tai Chi and Qigong Intervention Research (We Sense Tai Chi): feasibility study. The Journal of the International Society of Chinese Health Practices2024;3(1):216.
51.
GerritsenRJSLafeberJvan den BeukelNBandGPH. No panacea? Tai chi enhances motoric but not executive functioning in a normal aging population. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021;28(5):645-668. doi:10.1080/13825585.2020.1809629
52.
LiangIJPerkinOJMcGuiganPMThompsonDWesternMJ.Feasibility and acceptability of home-based exercise snacking and tai chi snacking delivered remotely to self-isolating older adults during COVID-19. J Aging Phys Act. 2022;30(1):33-43. doi:10.1123/japa.2020-0391
