Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to test a survey that investigates individuals’ use and perceptions of the term “prediabetes.”
Methods
A cross-sectional research design and survey method was used, and a 17-item survey was developed by the research team. Individuals in the health field with an interest in diabetes prevention were recruited and completed an online survey.
Results
Of the 97 individuals who completed the survey, 68 reported use of the term. Use of the term very often, fairly often, and sometimes was related to varying beliefs about seriousness, use in clinical practice, influence of communication style, adherence to risk-reducing recommendations, and global definition and diagnosis.
Conclusions
Individuals acknowledged the general impact of their communication and the impact of the term “prediabetes”; however, the variation in perceived impact indicates the need for standardized guidelines for use of the term. Moving forward, it is necessary for individuals who communicate risk with the word “prediabetes” to consider the purpose of using the term and a process for feedback from at-risk individuals about impact or understanding of the term.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.