The purpose of the study was to describe the collaborative process of a deaf-hearing research team developing diabetes education videos in American Sign Language (ASL) for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) populations.
Methods
Diabetes education videos were guided by a DHH community advisory board (CAB) who were living with diabetes (N = 10), DHH video production team (N = 9), DHH research team members (N = 3), hearing clinical experts and research team members (N = 3), and a hearing designer (N = 1). Over 10 meetings, the CAB provided ongoing feedback to enhance video content and design. Videos were then developed using a rigorous 5-step process that involved script development, design of visual supports, script translation into ASL by native signers, video recording, and video editing. Interviews with individual CAB members were obtained to understand future video needs.
Results
Using a design thinking and collaborative approach between deaf-hearing team members, 20 diabetes education videos were designed to prioritize ASL and DHH culture while still being inclusive for hearing family members who may not know ASL. The videos met the WebAIM guidelines for accessibility. CAB members rated the videos positively.
Conclusions
The diabetes education videos in ASL fill an existing void in diabetes education for DHH populations and are still being evaluated in the Deaf Diabetes Can Together intervention and will be placed on a future diabetes education website in ASL. This article highlights key details of developing diabetes education videos using a deaf-hearing team that future studies could learn from.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BainbridgeKEHoffmanHJCowieCC.Diabetes and hearing impairment in the United States: audiometric evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(1):1-10.
2.
PollardRQBarnettS.Health-related vocabulary knowledge among deaf adults. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(2):182-185. doi:10.1037/a0015771
3.
McKeeMMPaasche-OrlowMKWintersPC, et al. Assessing health literacy in deaf American sign language users.J Health Commun. 2015;20(suppl 2):92-100. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1066468
4.
MalcolmKASuenJJNiemanCL.Socioeconomic position and hearing loss: current understanding and recent advances. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;30(5):351-357. doi:10.1097/moo.0000000000000831
5.
EmmettSDFrancisHW.The socioeconomic impact of hearing loss in U.S. adults. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(3):545-550. doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000000562
6.
KushalnagarPHarrisRPaludnevicieneRHoglindT.Health Information National Trends Survey in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL): protocol for the cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of a national survey. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(9):e172. doi:10.2196/resprot.8067
7.
LitchmanMLMorelandCFagerlinAKushalnagarP.Limited diabetes education and resources in American Sign Language. Diabetes Spectr. 2022;35(2):134-135. doi:10.2337/ds21-0091
8.
SchniedewindELindsayRSnowS.Ask and ye shall not receive: interpreter-related access barriers reported by Deaf users of American sign language. Disabil Health J. 2020;13(4):100932. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100932
9.
NicodemusBSWhynotLKushalnagarP.Insights from US deaf patients: interpreters’ presence and receptive skills matter in patient-centered communication care. J Interpret. 2020;28(2):5. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/joi/vol28/iss2/5
10.
RinkerJDickinsonJKLitchmanML, et al. The 2017 Diabetes Educator and the Diabetes Self-Management Education National Practice Survey. Diabetes Educ. 2018;44(3):260-268. doi:10.1177/0145721718765446
11.
HallSBallardM.Deaf patients’ preferred communication in clinical settings: implications for healthcare providers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024;29(2):170-186. doi:10.1093/deafed/enad061
Abou-AbdallahMLamymanA.Exploring communication difficulties with deaf patients. Clin Med (Lond). 2021;21(4):e380-e383. doi:10.7861/clinmed.2021-0111
14.
AstutiDSabirAFultonP, et al. Monogenic diabetes syndromes: locus-specific databases for Alström, Wolfram, and Thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia. Hum Mutat. 2017;38(7):764-777. doi:10.1002/humu.23233
15.
MitchellREKarchmerM.Chasing the mythical ten percent: parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Lang Stud. 2004;4(2):138-163.
16.
HumphriesTKushalnagarPMathurG, et al. Language acquisition for deaf children: reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduct J. 2012;9:16. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-16
17.
MitchellREKarchmerMA.Parental hearing status and signing among deaf and hard of hearing students. Sign Lang Stud. 2005;5(2):231-244.
18.
HumphriesTKushalnagarPMathurG, et al. Avoiding linguistic neglect of deaf children. Soc Serv Rev. 2016;90(4):589-619.
19.
GlickmanNSHallWC.Language Deprivation and Deaf Mental Health. Routledge; 2018.
20.
HallWCSmithSRSutterEJDeWindtLADyeTDV. Considering parental hearing status as a social determinant of deaf population health: insights from experiences of the “dinner table syndrome.”PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0202169. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202169
21.
RogersKDFerguson-ColemanEYoungA.Challenges of realising patient-centred outcomes for deaf patients. Patient. 2018;11(1):9-16.
22.
Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists, Kolb L. An effective model of diabetes care and education: the ADCES7 Self-Care Behaviors™. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021;47(1):30-53.
23.
ChoeSLimRSClarkKWangRBranzPSadlerGR.The impact of cervical cancer education for deaf women using a video educational tool employing American sign language, open captioning, and graphics. J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(1):10-15. doi:10.1080/08858190802665245
24.
JensenLGNakajiMHarryKMGallegosNMalcarneVLSadlerGR.Ovarian cancer: deaf and hearing women’s knowledge before and after an educational video. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28(4):647-655. doi:10.1007/s13187-013-0529-2
25.
HickeySMerzELMalcarneVLGunsaulsDCHuangJSadlerGR.Breast cancer education for the Deaf community in American Sign Language. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013;40(3):E86-E91. doi:10.1188/13.Onf.E86-e91
26.
HarryKMMalcarneVLBranzPFagerMGarciaBDSadlerGR.Evaluating a skin cancer education program for the deaf community. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27(3):501-506. doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0367-7
27.
ShabaikSLaHousseSFBranzPGandhiVKhanAMSadlerGR.Colorectal cancer video for the deaf community: a randomized control trial. J Cancer Educ. 2010;25(4):518-523. doi:10.1007/s13187-010-0113-y
28.
BlanchetteJEAaronSPAllenNALitchmanML.Equity in the provision of diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Spectr. 2022;35(3):284-294. doi:10.2337/dsi22-0005
29.
WhiteKR.Demographic considerations in serving children who are hard of hearing or deaf. J Early Hear Detect Interv. 2018;3(2):14-17.
30.
Ferguson-ColemanEJohnstonAYoungABrownFde Sainte CroixRRedfernP.How do we know what we don’t know? Exploring Deaf people’s experiences of supporting their Deaf family member living with dementia. Dementia. 2020;19(5):1381-1396.
31.
MayberryLSBergCAGreevyRAJrWallstonKA.Assessing helpful and harmful family and friend involvement in adults’ type 2 diabetes self-management. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1380-1388.
32.
HelgesonVSBergCAKellyCS, et al. Patient and partner illness appraisals and health among adults with type 1 diabetes. J Behav Med. 2019;42(3):480-492. doi:10.1007/s10865-018-0001-1
33.
SenghasRJMonaghanL.Signs of their times: Deaf communities and the culture of language. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2002;31(1):69-97.
34.
YardleyLMorrisonLBradburyKMullerI.The person-based approach to intervention development: application to digital health-related behavior change interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e30. doi:10.2196/jmir.4055
35.
MinklerMWallersteinN.Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
36.
WebAim:web accessibility in mind. [Home page] Institute for Disability Research, Policy, and Practice. Published 2025. Accessed January 21, 2025. https://webaim.org/
37.
SunniMKylloJBrunzellC, et al. A picture is worth a thousand words: a culturally-tailored video-based approach to diabetes education in Somali families of children with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2023;31:100313. doi:10.1016/j.jcte.2023.100313
38.
CalderónJLShaheenMHaysRDFlemingESNorrisKCBakerRS.Improving diabetes health literacy by animation. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(3):361-372.
39.
HoeCYWAhmadBWattersonJ. The use of videos for diabetes patient education: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024;40(2):e3722. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3722
Morán-AceretoL.Moving from language access to justice. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(4):439-440.
42.
QuadriNSWilkinsSKrohnKMannEMStaufferWMWalkerPF.Language justice: addressing linguistic disparities begins with language data collection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023;109(1):1-3. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.23-0237
43.
YoungAMAckermanJKyleJG.On creating a workable signing environment: deaf and hearing perspectives. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2000;5(2):186-195.
44.
WangEQPiperAM.Accessibility in action: co-located collaboration among deaf and hearing professionals. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2018;2(CSCW):180. doi:10.1145/3274449
45.
SetijaningrumEKassimASoegionoANAriawantaraPAF. Beyond tokenism, toward resilience: furthering a paradigmatic shift from intersecting narratives of disaster and disability realities in East Java, Indonesia. Cogent Soc Sci. 2024;10(1):2319376. doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2319376
46.
KrahnGLWalkerDKCorrea-De-AraujoR.Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(suppl 2):S198-S206. doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302182
47.
HolzerJKEllisLMerrittMW.Why we need community engagement in medical research. J Investig Med. 2014;62(6):851-855. doi:10.1097/jim.0000000000000097
