Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-10
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Revised Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2) in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Caregivers
The purpose of the study was to develop an Italian version of the Revised Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2), providing a cultural and linguistic validation supported by psychometrics and hypotheses testing.
Methods:
This multimethods study was divided into 4 phases: (a) cultural-linguistic validation, with a translation and back-translation process; (b) confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) considering the original scale’s structure (knowledge and insulin-specific knowledge); (c) criterion validity via hypotheses testing; and (d) cross-group measurement invariance. The internal consistency reliability was assessed by the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) of the overall scale.
Results:
A total of 251 patients and 251 caregivers were enrolled. The CFA showed good goodness of fit for both patients and caregivers. The tested hypotheses supported criterion validity in both groups. Reliability was adequate: All KR-20 values in both groups and domains were higher than 0.60. The mean percentage of knowledge score on DKT2 was lower for patients than caregivers.
Conclusion:
The DKT2 is a valid and reliable scale to assess overall knowledge of diabetes, considering its role in promoting appropriate self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Italian version of DKT2 demonstrated reliability and validity, and it can be used by researchers and diabetes care and education specialists to assess a patient’s or population’s overall knowledge of diabetes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SunHSaeediPKarurangaS, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. doi:10.1016/J.DIABRES.2021.109119
2.
CunninghamATCrittendonDRWhiteNMillsGDDiazVLanoueMD. The effect of diabetes self-management education on HbA1c and quality of life in African-Americans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:367. doi:10.1186/S12913-018-3186-7
3.
American Association of Diabetes Educators. An effective model of diabetes care and education: revising the AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors®. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(2):139-160. doi:10.1177/0145721719894903
4.
MurataGHShahJHAdamKD, et al. Factors affecting diabetes knowledge in type 2 diabetic veterans. Diabetologia. 2003;46(8):1170-1178. doi:10.1007/S00125-003-1161-1
5.
AdejohSO. Diabetes knowledge, health belief, and diabetes management among the Igala, Nigeria. SAGE Open. 2014;4(2):2158244014539966. doi:10.1177/2158244014539966
6.
BruceDGDavisWACullCADavisTME. Diabetes education and knowledge in patients with type 2 diabetes from the community: the Fremantle Diabetes Study. J Diabetes Complications. 2003;17(2):82-89. doi:10.1016/S1056-8727(02)00191-5
7.
LeeCSLShiuATY. Perceived health care climate, diabetes knowledge and self-care practice of Hong Kong Chinese older patients: a pilot study. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(4):534-535. doi:10.1046/J.1365-2702.2003.00892.X
8.
McPhersonMLSmithSWPowersAZuckermanIH. Association between diabetes patients’ knowledge about medications and their blood glucose control. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2008;4(1):37-45. doi:10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2007.01.002
9.
GarciaAAVillagomezETBrownSAKouzekananiKHanisCL. The Starr County diabetes education study: development of the Spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):16-21. doi:10.2337/DIACARE.24.1.16
10.
EigenmannCAColagiuriRSkinnerTCTrevenaL. Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education?Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):425-436. doi:10.1111/J.1464-5491.2009.02697.X
11.
FitzgeraldJTFunnellMMHessGE, et al. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(5):706-710. doi:10.2337/diacare.21.5.706
12.
DunnSMBrysonJMHoskinsPLAlfordJBHandelsmanDJTurtleJR. Development of the Diabetes Knowledge (DKN) Scales: forms DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC. Diabetes Care. 1984;7(1):36-41. doi:10.2337/DIACARE.7.1.36
13.
SpeightJBradleyC. The ADKnowl: identifying knowledge deficits in diabetes care. Diabet Med. 2001;18(8):626-633. doi:10.1046/J.1464-5491.2001.00537.X
14.
QuandtSAIpEHKirkJK, et al. Assessment of a short diabetes knowledge instrument for older and minority adults. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(1):68-76. doi:10.1177/0145721713508824
15.
CollinsGSMughalSBarnettAHFitzgeraldJLloydCE. Modification and validation of the Revised Diabetes Knowledge Scale. Diabet Med. 2011;28(3):306-310. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03190.x
16.
FitzgeraldJTFunnellMMAndersonRMNwankwoRStansfieldRBPiattGA. Validation of the Revised Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2). Diabetes Educ. 2016;42(2):178-187. doi:10.1177/0145721715624968
17.
AlhaitiAHAlotaibiARJonesLKDaCostaCLenonGB. Psychometric evaluation of the Revised Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test (V.2016) in Arabic: translation and validation. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:9643714. doi:10.1155/2016/9643714
18.
GrimacciaFKanavosP. Cost, outcomes, treatment pathways and challenges for diabetes care in Italy. Glob Health. 2014;10:58. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-10-58
19.
World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
20.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(suppl 1):S15-S33. doi:10.2337/DC21-S002
21.
FloydFJWidamanKF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):286-299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
22.
KrosnickJAPresserS. Question and questionnaire design.In: MarsdenPVWrightJD, eds. Handbook of Survey Research. Esmerald Group Publishing; 2010:263-313.
23.
RiegelBJaarsmaTStrömbergASteinbrightEC. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Adv Nurs Sci. 2012;3(35):194-204. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261b1ba
24.
AusiliDBarbaranelliCRossiE, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a theory-based tool to measure self-care in diabetes patients: the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory. BMC Endocr Disord. 2017;17(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12902-017-0218-y
25.
FabriziDNattaILucianiMMauroSDReboraPAusiliD. Self-care and caregiver contribution to self-care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot cross-sectional study. Int Diabetes Nurs. 2022;15:1-10. doi:10.57177/idn.v15.12
26.
ChaESKimKHErlenJA. Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(4):386-395. doi:10.1111/J.1365-2648.2007.04242.X
Al-AdsaniAMSAl-HamadNM. The level and determinants of diabetes knowledge in Kuwaiti adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35(2):121-128. doi:10.1016/J.DIABET.2008.09.005
29.
JasperUSOgundunmadeBGOparaMCAkinrolieOPyikiEBUmarA. Determinants of diabetes knowledge in a cohort of Nigerian diabetics. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014;13(1):39. doi:10.1186/2251-6581-13-39
30.
ChenAMHYehleKSAlbertNM, et al. Relationships between health literacy and heart failure knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-care adherence. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(2):378-386. doi:10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2013.07.001
31.
PersellSDKeatingNLLandrumMB, et al. Relationship of diabetes-specific knowledge to self-management activities, ambulatory preventive care, and metabolic outcomes. Prev Med. 2004;39(4):746-752. doi:10.1016/J.YPMED.2004.02.045
32.
BaigAABenitezAQuinnMTBurnetDL. Family interventions to improve diabetes outcomes for adults. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1353(1):89-112. doi:10.1111/NYAS.12844
33.
PamungkasRAChamroonsawasdiKVatanasomboonP. A systematic review: family support integrated with diabetes self-management among uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus patients. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017;7(3):62. doi:10.3390/bs7030062
34.
AlotaibiAAl-GanmiAGholizadehLPerryL. Diabetes knowledge of nurses in different countries: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;39:32-49. doi:10.1016/J.NEDT.2016.01.017
35.
ChenAMHYehleKSPlakeKS, et al. The role of health literacy, depression, disease knowledge, and self-efficacy in self-care among adults with heart failure: an updated model. Heart Lung. 2020;49(6):702-708. doi:10.1016/J.HRTLNG.2020.08.004
36.
MichalosAC, ed. Kuder-Richardson KR20 formula. In: Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands; 2014:3482. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102199
37.
BrownTA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. The Guilford Press; 2006.
38.
MasynKE. Measurement invariance and differential item functioning in latent class analysis with stepwise multiple indicator multiple cause modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24(2):180-197. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1254049
39.
EvertABDennisonMGardnerCD, et al. Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes or prediabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):731-754. doi:10.2337/DCI19-0014
40.
PowersMABardsleyJCypressM, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(7):1372-1382. doi:10.2337/dc15-0730
41.
PowersMABardsleyJKCypressM, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in adults with type 2 diabetes: a consensus report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(4):350-369. doi:10.1177/0145721720930959
42.
CarusoRMagonABaroniI, et al. Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(1):1-12. doi:10.1007/s00592-017-1071-1
43.
van ZonSKRSniederHBültmannUReijneveldSA. The interaction of socioeconomic position and type 2 diabetes mellitus family history: a cross-sectional analysis of the Lifelines Cohort and Biobank Study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e015275. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015275
44.
LosebyPSchacheKCavadinoAYoungSHofmanPLSerlachiusA. The role of protective psychological factors, self-care behaviors, and HbA1c in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(3):380-389. doi:10.1111/pedi.13306
45.
CarusoRReboraPDellafioreF, et al. Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of inadequate self-care in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the leading role of self-care confidence. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(2):151-161. doi:10.1007/s00592-018-1259-z
46.
DellafioreFBorellaAMagonA, et al. Descriptive pilot study on self-care and daily living activities in Italian patients with heart failure: what are the criticalities?Ric E Prat. 2018;34(1):6-16. doi:10.1707/2860.28840
47.
GarinO. Floor effect. In: MichalosAC, ed. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands; 2014:2300. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1059
48.
PutnickDLBornsteinMH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71-90. doi:10.1016/J.DR.2016.06.004
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
