The authors conduct a multimodal analysis of the anti-corruption discourse in China by employing the SFL genre theory and the SF-MDA approach. Anti-corruption discourse that popularizes the anti-corruption mechanism and educates the officials constitutes an important part of China’s anti-corruption campaign. This paper first presents a genre analysis of a corpus of 51 anti-corruption videos on the official public legal education website to examine how these videos are designed in their overall organization to achieve the persuasion purpose—alert officials to stay away from corruption. It is found that most anti-corruption videos are expositions that are embedded with different story genres and emphasize the negative consequence of corruption on one’s family. Using Multimodal Analysis Video software, the authors then analyze the different reader stances enacted through a range of multimodal resources in three representative anti-corruption videos. Based on the detailed multimodal analysis, the authors finally explain how the use of linguistic and visual resources in the videos realizes the underlying ideologies of rule by law and rule of law and future implications of this study.
BaillieATannerJ (1988/1991) Drac and the Gremlin. Puffin.
2.
BlasekK (2015) Rule of Law in China: A Comparative Approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3.
BrowneA (1986) Piggybook. Walker Books Ltd.
4.
CapleH (2013) Photojournalism: A Social Semiotic Approach. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
ChristieF (ed) (1999) Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London, UK: Cassell & Co.
6.
CrewGRogersG (1992) Lucy’s Bay. Jam Roll Press.
7.
DentonT (1985) Felix & Alexander. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DjonovEZhaoS (eds) (2014) Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
9.
EconomouD (2009) Photos in the News: Appraisal Analysis of Visual Semiosis and Verbal–visual Intersemiosis. PhD Thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
10.
FaircloughN (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
FrijdaNHMesquitaB (2000) Beliefs through emotions. In: FrijdaNMansteadABemS (eds) Emotions and Beliefs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–77.
12.
HoodS (2011) Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning. In: DreyfusSHoodSStenglinM (eds) Semiotic Margins Meaning in Multimodalities. London: Continuum, pp. 31–52.
13.
JanksH (1997) Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education18(3): 329–342.
14.
KnightN (2010) Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In: BednarekMMartinJR (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London: Continuum, pp. 35–58.
15.
KressGvan LeeuwenT (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
16.
LiX (2018) Construction of mechanism of “dare not be, can not be and will not be corrupt”—from the perspective of the guarantee of the rule of law. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)18(4): 39–47.
17.
MachinDMayrA (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London, UK: Sage.
18.
Macken-HorarikM (2003a) A telling symbiosis in the discourse of hatred: Multimodal news texts about the ‘children overboard’ affair. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics26: 1–16.
19.
Macken-HorarikM (2003b) Working the borders in racist discourse: The challenge of the ‘children overboard affair’ in news media texts. Social Semiotics13: 283–303.
20.
MalinowskiB (1935) Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
21.
MartinJR (2010) Semantic variation: Modelling system, text and affiliation in social semiosis. In: BednarekMMartinJR (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 1–34.
PeerenboomR (2002) China’s Long March Toward Rule of Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
PelclováJLuW (2018) Persuasion across times, domains and modalities: Theoretical considerations and emerging themes. In: PelclováJLuW (eds) Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and Functional Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–18.
29.
RoseD (2004) Sequencing and pacing of the hidden curriculum: how indigenous children are left out of the chain. In: MullerJDaviesBMoraisA (eds) Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein. London: Routledge Falmer, pp. 91–107.
30.
RoseD (2005) Narrative and the origins of discourse: Construing experience in stories around the world. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series19: 151–173.
31.
RoseD (2007) A reading-based model of schooling. Pesquisas Em Discurso Pedagógico4(2): 1–22.
32.
StenglinM (2004) Packaging Curiosities: Towards a Grammar of Three-Dimensional Space. Sydney: Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
33.
UnsworthL (2013) Point of view in Picture books and animated movie adaptations. Scan: The Journal for Educators32(1): 28–37.
34.
UnsworthL (2015) Persuasive narratives: Evaluative images in picture books and animated movies. Visual Communication14(1): 73–96.
35.
van DijkT (1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36.
WelchA (2005) The Illustration of Facial Affect in Children’s Literature. Unpublished BA Hons coursework paper, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
37.
WhitePRR (2006) Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. In: LassenLStrunckJVestergaardA (eds) Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 37–67.
38.
ZhengY (1999) From rule by law to rule of law? A realistic view of China’s legal development. China Perspectives25: 31–43.
