Timing and Outcomes of Endoscopy for Esophageal Food Bolus Impaction

Abstract

Background:

The etiology, natural history, urgency, and timely management of esophageal food bolus impaction (EFBI) are not well known.

Objective:

To determine the optimal timing for endoscopic disimpaction and outcomes.

Design:

Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting:

Urban community hospital.

Patients and Methods:

Patients with EFBI who presented to the ED were reviewed. Patient demographics, times from symptom onset to ED visit and times from ED to Endoscopy, endoscopic findings, and other data were analyzed.

Results:

Of 105 patients with EFBI, 74 required endoscopy, 31 cleared spontaneously. At endoscopy, 5 boluses (7%) had already passed into the stomach; 29 (39%) were pushed into the stomach using the endoscope; 6 (8%) were removed with rat tooth forceps; 16 (22%) were removed using the Roth net. The time from EFBI until arrival differed significantly between subjects who resolved spontaneously and those who received an EGD. Fifty percent of subjects resolved spontaneously within 3.3 hours, and 50% of subjects who received an EGD did so within 4.0 hours. The longest time from arrival until resolution was 13.1 hours for subjects who resolved spontaneously and 19 hours for those who received an EGD. There was a significant direct relationship between subjects’ age and time from EFBI and arrival but not between subjects’ age and time from arrival until resolution.

Limitations:

Retrospective, single-center, community study.

Conclusions:

Endoscopic disimpaction for EFBI is safe and effective even if it is performed within 10 hours after presentation. Overall, EFBI is not an endoscopic emergency and carries a favorable outcome.

Keywords

dysphagia food bolus impaction emergency endoscopy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Ikenberry

Jue

Anderson

, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(6):1085-1091.

Gurala

Polavarapu

Philipose

, et al. Esophageal Food Impaction: A Retrospective Chart Review. Gastroenterol Res. 2021;14(3):173-178.

Longstreth

Yao

. Esophageal food impaction: epidemiology and therapy. A retrospective, observational study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(2):193-198.

Vicari

Johanson

Frakes

. Outcomes of acute esophageal food impaction: success of the push technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(2):178-181.

Weinstock

Shatz

Thyssen

. Esophageal food bolus obstruction: evaluation of extraction and modified push techniques in 75 cases. Endoscopy. 1999;31(6):421-425.

David

Backstedt

O'Keefe

Salehpour

Gerkin

Ramirez

. Effervescent agents in acute esophageal food impaction. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32(4):eng88091601120.

Haas

Leo

Vakil

. Glucagon is a safe and inexpensive initial strategy in esophageal food bolus impaction. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(3):841-845.

Hardman

Sharma

Smith

Nankivell

. Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5(5):CD007352.

Fung

Sweetser

Wong

Kee

Song

Tabibian

. Foreign object ingestion and esophageal food impaction: an update and review on endoscopic management. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(3):174-192.

10.

Yamamoto

Furuya

Tamada

Kondo

. Impacts of wearing complete dentures on bolus transport during feeding in elderly edentulous. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(12):923-931.

11.

Sharma

Philpott

. Food Bolus impaction in the era of increased EoE recognition: Push and pull, biopsy and dilate before it is too late. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(6):1371-1373.

12.

Oda

Iwakiri

Hara

, et al. Dysphagia associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease is improved by proton pump inhibitor. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1921-1926.

13.

Mitrović

Karan

Vucinić

. Oesophageal food bolus impaction in elderly people. Med Pregl. 2014;67(1-2):33-37.

14.

Mahesh

Holloway

Nguyen

. Changing epidemiology of food bolus impaction: is eosinophilic esophagitis to blame? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28(6):963-966.

15.

Sella-Weiss

. Association between swallowing function, malnutrition and frailty in community dwelling older people. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;45:476-485.

16.

Lake

Smoot

O'Halloran

Shortsleeve

. A review of optimal evaluation and treatment of suspected esophageal food impaction. Emerg Radiol. 2021;28(2):401-407.

17.

Robbins

Shortsleeve

. Treatment of acute esophageal food impaction with glucagon, an effervescent agent, and water. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(2):325-328.

18.

Sengupta

Tapper

Corban

Sommers

Leffler

Lembo

. The clinical predictors of aetiology and complications among 173 patients presenting to the emergency department with oesophageal food bolus impaction from 2004-2014. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(1):91-98.

19.

Heerasing

Lee

Alexander

Dowling

. Prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in adults presenting with oesophageal food bolus obstruction. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2015;6(4):244-247.

20.

Reddy

Bennett

Burrows

Bird

Counter

. Recurrence of food bolus impaction of the oesophagus: a retrospective observational study. Int J Surg. 2011;9(6):464-466.

21.

Geraci

Sciume

Di Carlo

Picciurro

Modica

. Retrospective analysis of management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions in emergency endoscopic setting in adults. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16(1):42.