Public assessments of crime seriousness have traditionally focused on the harmfulness and wrongfulness of offences yet often neglect to systematically integrate these dimensions with intent or consider the broader context of offence categories. Consequently, existing measures lack precision in both scoring methods and comparative analyses. This study introduces a new measurement scale that incorporates harmfulness, intent, and wrongfulness within the framework of offence categories. Drawing on survey responses from 242 adults who rated 37 offences from the Israeli Penal Code, we applied the method of Successive Intervals (SI) to develop a weighted crime seriousness index. Findings reveal that harmfulness is consistently the most influential factor in shaping public perceptions of crime seriousness, while the impact of intent and wrongfulness varies across different types of crimes. Incorporating category-level seriousness enhanced measurement accuracy, with some offences perceived as more serious due to their categorical context rather than their intrinsic attributes. Comparisons with legal sentencing patterns exposed both areas of alignment and divergence between public opinion and formal legal standards. By integrating all components of crime seriousness and offence categories using the SI scaling method, the proposed index offers a novel and precise tool to support research and policymaking, particularly in areas where public perceptions diverge from legal sentencing standards.
AdriaenssenA.KarstedtS.PaoliL.VisschersJ. (2019). Taking crime seriously: Conservation values and legal cynicism as predictors of public perceptions of the seriousness of crime. International Criminal Justice Review, 29(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567718824391
2.
AdriaenssenA.PaoliL.KarstedtS.VisschersJ.GreenfieldV. A.PleysierS. (2020). Public perceptions of the seriousness of crime: Weighing the harm and the wrong. European Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818772768
3.
AkmanD. D.NormandeauA.TurnerS. (1967). The measurement of delinquency in Canada. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 58(3), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.2307/1141627
4.
AndreevaV. A.SalanaveB.CastetbonK.DeschampsV.VernayM.Kesse-GuyotE.HercbergS. (2015). Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69(9), 893–898.
5.
AshworthA.KellyR. (2021). Sentencing and criminal justice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
6.
AskK.PinaA. (2011). On being angry and punitive: How anger alters perception of criminal intent. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506113984
7.
BatesM. P.FurlongM. J.GreenJ. G. (2006). Are CAFAS subscales and item weights valid? A preliminary investigation of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(6), 682–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0052-4
8.
BeccariaC. (2016). On crimes and punishments. Transaction Publishers.
9.
BlandM.ArielB. (2015). Targeting escalation in reported domestic abuse: Evidence from 36,000 callouts. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567715574382
BroadhurstR.IndermaurD. (1982). Crime seriousness ratings: The relationship of information accuracy and general attitudes in western Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 15(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486588201500404
12.
BurtonS. E.FinnM.LivingstonD.ScullyK.BalesW. D.PadgettK. (2004). Applying a crime seriousness scale to measure changes in the severity of offenses by individuals arrested in Florida. Justice Research and Policy, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.6.1.2004.1
13.
ButtonM.BlackbournD.SugiuraL.ShepherdD.KapendR.WangV. (2021). From feeling like rape to a minor inconvenience: Victims’ accounts of the impact of computer misuse crime in the United Kingdom. Telematics and Informatics, 64, 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101675
14.
CalmeiroM. L.SousaP.CruzJ. (2024). Predictors of perceived wrongfulness and harmfulness of crime among residents in Portugal. Journal of Criminal Justice, 90, Article 102148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102148
15.
ChiricosT.BarrickK.BalesW.BontragerS. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 45(3), 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00089.x
16.
ClarkW. W. (1922). Whittier scale for grading juvenile offenses. Whittier State School.
17.
ClarkeR. V.FelsonM.2017). Routine activity and rational choice: Volume 5. Routledge.
CullenF. T.ChouhyC.JonsonC. L. (2019). Public opinion about white-collar crime. In M. L. Rorie (Ed.), The handbook of white-collar crime (pp. 209–228). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118775004.ch14
20.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/652198
21.
CullenF. T.LinkB. G.TravisL. F.WozniakJ. F. (1985). Consensus in crime seriousness: Empirical reality or methodological artifact?Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00328.x
22.
DaganN. (2015). Looking beyond risk in paroling denying prisoners: A response to Assy and Menashe’s “the catch-22 in Israel’s parole law”. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 42(8), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815589324
DouglasK. S.OgloffJ. R. (1997). Public opinion of statutory maximum sentences in the Canadian criminal code: Comparison of offences against property and offences against people. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39(4), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJCRIM.39.4.433
25.
EdwardsA. L. (1952). The scaling of stimuli by the method of successive intervals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058208
26.
EdwardsA. L. (1983). Techniques of attitude scale construction. Ardent Media.
EdwardsA. L.ThurstoneL. L. (1952). An internal consistency check for scale values determined by the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 17(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288780
29.
EinatT.HerzogS. (2011). Understanding the relationship between perceptions of crime seriousness and recommended punishment: An exploratory comparison of adults and adolescents. Criminal Justice Studies, 24(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2011.544183
30.
EvansS. S.ScottJ. E. (1984). The seriousness of crime cross-culturally: The impact of religiosity. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00287.x
31.
FactorR.Gur-AryeM. (2020). Social solidarity and sentencing disparities between ethnic groups: The case of hit-and-run traffic offenses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 17(1), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12245
32.
FelsonR. B. (2009). Violence, crime, and violent crime. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2791
33.
FiglioR. M. (1975). Seriousness of offenses: An evaluation by offenders and nonoffenders. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 66, Article 189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142782
34.
FishmanG.KrausV.CohenB. Z. (1986). A multidimensional approach to the problem of crime seriousness. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 10(1–2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1986.9688842
35.
FisselE. R.LeeJ. R. (2023). The cybercrime illusion: Examining the impact of cybercrime misbeliefs on perceptions of cybercrime seriousness. Journal of Criminology, 56(2-3), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231174639
36.
FoxR.FreibergA. (1990). Ranking offence seriousness in reviewing statutory maximum penalties. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 23(3), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486589002300303
37.
FrancisB.HumphreysL.SoothillK.Cutajar BezzinaA. (2007). Developing measures of severity and frequency of reconviction. Home Office. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/50137/
38.
FraseR. S.RobertsJ. V. (2019). Paying for the past: The case against prior record sentence enhancements. Oxford University Press.
GillespieS. M.RotshteinP.SatherleyR. M.BeechA. R.MitchellI. J. (2015). Emotional expression recognition and attribution bias among sexual and violent offenders: A signal detection analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00595
41.
GoldstoneR. L.KerstenA.CarvalhoP. F. (2013). Concepts and categorization. In HealyA. F.ProctorR. W. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (pp. 607–630). Wiley.
42.
GreenB. F. (1954). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1. Theory and method, pp. 335–369). Addison-Wesley.
43.
GreenfieldV. A.PaoliL. (2013). A framework to assess the harms of crimes. British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 864–885. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt018
44.
GrossmanG.Gazal-AyalO.PimentelS. D.WeinsteinJ. M. (2016). Descriptive representation and judicial outcomes in multiethnic societies. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12187
HerzogS. (2003). Does the ethnicity of offenders in crime scenarios affect public perceptions of crime seriousness? A randomized survey experiment in Israel. Social Forces, 82(2), 757–781. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0011
47.
HerzogS. (2006). Public perceptions of crime seriousness: A comparison of social divisions in Israel. Israel Law Review, 39(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700012917
48.
HerzogS.EinatT. (2016). Moral judgment, crime seriousness, and the relations between them: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 62(4), 470–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712466889
49.
HindelangM. J.HirschiT.WeisJ. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. American Sociological Review, 44(6), 995–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094722
50.
HoltfreterK.Van SlykeS.BrattonJ.GertzM. (2008). Public perceptions of white-collar crime and punishment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.12.006
51.
HsuM. (1973). Cultural and sexual differences on the judgment of criminal offenses: A replication study of the measurement of delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 64, Article 348. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142378
52.
HurwitzJ.PeffleyM. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111769
53.
IgnatansD.PeaseK. (2016). Taking crime seriously: Playing the weighting game. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 10(3), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pav029
LiuJ.FrancisB.SoothillK. (2011). A longitudinal study of escalation in crime seriousness. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9102-x
60.
LuR. (2015). Public perceptions of crime. In JenningsW. G. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of crime and punishment (pp. 1–5). Wiley.
61.
MacKinnellI.PolettiP.HolmesM. (2010). Measuring offence seriousness. Judicial Commission of New South Wales.
62.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
63.
MasonT.de SilvaN.SharmaN.BrownD.HarperG. (2007). Local variation in sentencing in England and Wales. Ministry of Justice.
64.
MichelC. (2016). Violent street crime versus harmful white-collar crime: A comparison of perceived seriousness and punitiveness. Critical Criminology, 24, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-015-9295-2
65.
NewmanG. (1976). Comparative deviance: Perception and law in six cultures. Elsevier.
66.
NorranderB. (2000). The multi-layered impact of public opinion on capital punishment implementation in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 53(4), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300405
67.
NuzzoJ. (2021). Volunteer bias and female participation in exercise and sports science research. Quest, 73(1), 82–101.
PartonD. A.HanselM.StrattonJ. R. (1991). Measuring crime seriousness: Lessons from the national survey of crime seriousness. The British Journal of Criminology, 31(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048086
RatcliffeJ. H. (2015). Towards an index for harm-focused policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 9(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pau032
72.
ReimanJ. (1998). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
73.
RobertsJ. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Crime and Justice, 16, 99–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/449205
74.
RobertsJ. V. (2014). Clarifying the significance of public opinion for sentencing policy and practice (pp. 228–252). Oxford University Press.
75.
RobertsJ. (2018). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Routledge.
76.
RobertsJ. V.DaganN. (2023). Rewarding virtue: An ethical defence of plea-based sentence reductions. In RobertsJ. V. (Ed.), Sentencing the self-convicted: The ethics of pleading guilty (pp. 71). Routledge.
77.
RobertsJ. V.De KeijserJ. W. (2014). Democratising punishment: Sentencing, community views and values. Punishment & Society, 16(4), 474–498.
78.
RosenmerkelS. P. (2001). Wrongfulness and harmfulness as components of seriousness of white-collar offenses. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17(4), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986201017004002
79.
RossiP. H.SimpsonJ. E.MillerJ. L. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065249
80.
RossiP. H.WaiteE.BoseC. E.BerkR. E. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 224–237. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2094234
81.
RothJ. A. (1978). Prosecutor perceptions of crime seriousness. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 69, Article 232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142397
82.
SangeroB. (2020). Critique of the Israeli criminal law. Nevo.
83.
SchwartzJ.VegaA. (2017). Sources of crime data. In WelshB. C. (Ed.), Preventing crime and violence (pp. 155–167). Springer.
84.
SebbaL. (1980). Is mens rea a component of perceived offense seriousness?The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142721
SellinT.WolfgangM. E. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. Wiley.
87.
SextonL. (2015). Penal subjectivities: Developing a theoretical framework for penal consciousness. Punishment & Society, 17(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514548790
88.
ShermanL.NeyroudP. W.NeyroudE. (2016). The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring total harm from crime based on sentencing guidelines. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 10(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw003
89.
SimpsonS. S.GalvinM. A.LoughranT. A.CohenM. A. (2023). Perceptions of white-collar crime seriousness: Unpacking and translating attitudes into policy preferences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 60(5), 582–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221092
90.
StylianouS. (2003). Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have we learned and what else do we want to know. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00198-8
TonryM. (2014). Remodeling American sentencing: A ten-step blueprint for moving past mass incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(4), 503–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12097
94.
TonryM. (2019). Of one-eyed and toothless miscreants: Making the punishment fit the crime?Oxford University Press.
95.
Van GinnekenE. F.HayesD. (2017). "Just" punishment? Offenders’ views on the meaning and severity of punishment. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958166542
WallaceS.FrancisB. (2024). Developing a complete sentence severity scale using extended Goodman RC models. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-024-09591-6
98.
WarnerK.DavisJ.SpiranovicC.CockburnH.FreibergA. (2017). Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study. Punishment & Society, 19(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516660697
WestenP. (2007). Impossibility attempts: A speculative thesis. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 5, 523.
101.
WolfgangM. E. (1985). The national survey of crime seriousness. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
102.
YarM. (2005). The novelty of "cybercrime": An assessment in light of routine activity theory. European Journal of Criminology, 2(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/147737080556056
103.
YoungsD.IoannouM.EaglesJ. (2016). Expressive and instrumental offending: Reconciling the paradox of specialisation and versatility. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(4), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X145574
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
